Multiform Korean handwriting authentication by forensic document examiners

被引:1
|
作者
Kang, Tae-Yi [1 ]
Lee, Joong [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Forens Serv, Digital Technol & Biometry Div, Wonju, Gangwon Do, South Korea
关键词
Forensic science; Handwriting identification; Validation; Peer review; OPINIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.07.002
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律]; R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
0301 ; 10 ;
摘要
Forensic document examiners of Multiform Korean handwriting were tested using blind trials. A small number of experts (4) were tested for their performance and the test involved three steps. The participants each conducted a one-person examination first, then paired up with another person to perform the two-person examination and then finally the four people came together to conduct a group examination. When the experts actively exchanged opinions, the percentage of misleading decisions decreased while the percentage of inconclusive opinions increased. The deviations in the percentages of misleading results for different handwriting samples (long, short, signature) were not significant, while the disguised handwriting results showed the highest percentage of misleading conclusions. A special attention to artificially modified handwriting is therefore warranted rather than focusing on the number of letters. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 136
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Signature authentication by forensic document examiners
    Kam, M
    Gummadidala, K
    Fielding, G
    Conn, R
    JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES, 2001, 46 (04) : 884 - 888
  • [2] A study on factors that affect error rates in handwriting examinations of Korean characters by forensic document examiners and non-experts
    Kang, Tae-Yi
    Kim, Hongseok
    Yook, Simyub
    Lee, Joong
    FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 334
  • [3] Forensic Document Examiners' Skill in Distinguishing Between Natural and Disguised Handwriting Behaviors
    Bird, Carolyne
    Found, Bryan
    Rogers, Doug
    JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES, 2010, 55 (05) : 1291 - 1295
  • [4] Forensic handwriting examiners' expertise for signature comparison
    Sita, J
    Found, B
    Rogers, DK
    JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES, 2002, 47 (05) : 1117 - 1124
  • [5] A statistical approach to aid examiners in the forensic analysis of handwriting
    Crawford, Amy M. M.
    Ommen, Danica M. M.
    Carriquiry, Alicia L. L.
    JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES, 2023, 68 (05) : 1768 - 1779
  • [6] Biasability and reliability of expert forensic document examiners
    Dror, Itiel E.
    Scherr, Kyle C.
    Mohammed, Linton A.
    MacLean, Carla. L.
    Cunningham, Lloyd
    FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 318
  • [7] Analysis of the expertise effect of forensic document examiners
    Seki, Yoko
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 58 : 527 - 528
  • [8] THE CERTIFICATION OF DOCUMENT EXAMINERS IN THE UNITED-STATES - A HISTORY OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FORENSIC DOCUMENT EXAMINERS
    MCCARTHY, JF
    JOURNAL OF THE FORENSIC SCIENCE SOCIETY, 1981, 21 (02): : 125 - 125
  • [9] Expertise of forensic document examiners: A signal detection analysis
    Phillips, JG
    Rogers, D
    Found, B
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 56 : 132 - 132
  • [10] Explainable offline automatic signature verifier to support forensic handwriting examiners
    Moises Diaz
    Miguel A. Ferrer
    Gennaro Vessio
    Neural Computing and Applications, 2024, 36 : 2411 - 2427