Safety profile of magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease

被引:1
|
作者
Froiio, Caterina [1 ]
Aiolfi, Alberto [2 ]
Bona, Davide [2 ]
Bonavina, Luigi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Dept Biomed Sci Hlth, Div Gen & Foregut Surg, IRCCS Policlin San Donato, Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Milan, Dept Biomed Sci Hlth, Div Gen Surg, IRCCS Galeazzi St Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
来源
FRONTIERS IN SURGERY | 2023年 / 10卷
关键词
magnetic sphincter augmentation device; LINX; erosion; dysphagia; MSA removal; gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD); LOWER ESOPHAGEAL SPHINCTER; MANAGEMENT-SYSTEM; DEVICE; EFFICACY; REMOVAL;
D O I
10.3389/fsurg.2023.1293270
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) procedure is an effective treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Adverse events requiring MSA device removal are rare, but the true prevalence and incidence may be underestimated.Methods: Retrospective study on a prospectively collected database. Patients who underwent MSA procedure between March 2007 and September 2021 in two tertiary-care referral centers for esophageal surgery were included. The trend of MSA explant, the changes in the sizing technique and crura repair over the years, the technique of explant, and the clinical outcomes of the revisional procedure were reviewed.Results: Out of 397 consecutive patients, 50 (12.4%) underwent MSA removal, with a median time to explant of 39.5 [IQR = 53.7] months. Main symptoms leading to removal were dysphagia (43.2%), heartburn (25%), and epigastric pain (13.6%). Erosion occurred in 2.5% of patients. Smaller (12- and 13-bead) devices were the ones most frequently explanted. The majority of the explants were performed laparoscopically with endoscopic assistance. There was no perioperative morbidity, and the median length of stay was 2.8 +/- 1.4 days. After 2014, changes in sizing technique and crura repair resulted in a decreased incidence of explants from 23% to 5% (p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis confirmed the protective role of added bead units [HR 0.06 (95% CI = 0.001-0.220); p < 0.000].Conclusion: Oversizing and full mediastinal dissection with posterior hiatoplasty may improve the outcomes of the MSA procedure and possibly reduce removal rates.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Subjective and Objective Measures of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Patients Undergoing Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation
    Kothari, Shanu N.
    Kallies, Kara J.
    Borgert, Andrew J.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2019, 229 (04) : E3 - E3
  • [32] Six to 12-year outcomes of magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease
    Ferrari, Davide
    Asti, Emanuele
    Lazzari, Veronica
    Siboni, Stefano
    Bernardi, Daniele
    Bonavina, Luigi
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [33] Manometric Changes to the Lower Esophageal Sphincter After Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation in Patients With Chronic Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
    Warren, Heather F.
    Louie, Brian E.
    Farivar, Alexander S.
    Wilshire, Candice
    Aye, Ralph W.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2017, 266 (01) : 99 - 104
  • [34] Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation Algorithm for Post-bariatric Surgery Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Patients
    Nikhil C. Reddy
    Joseph Sujka
    Christopher DuCoin
    Obesity Surgery, 2022, 32 : 3185 - 3187
  • [35] Real-world evidence with magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a scoping review
    Caterina Froiio
    Ahmad Tareq
    Valentina Riggio
    Stefano Siboni
    Luigi Bonavina
    European Surgery, 2023, 55 : 8 - 19
  • [36] Real-world evidence with magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a scoping review
    Froiio, Caterina
    Tareq, Ahmad
    Riggio, Valentina
    Siboni, Stefano
    Bonavina, Luigi
    EUROPEAN SURGERY-ACTA CHIRURGICA AUSTRIACA, 2023, 55 (01): : 8 - 19
  • [37] Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation Algorithm for Post-bariatric Surgery Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Patients
    Reddy, Nikhil C.
    Sujka, Joseph
    DuCoin, Christopher
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2022, 32 (09) : 3185 - 3187
  • [38] Adverse Events After Implantation of a Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation Device for Gastroesophageal Reflux
    Bielefeldt, Klaus
    CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2016, 14 (10) : 1507 - 1508
  • [39] Laparoscopic magnetic sphincter augmentation versus fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: systematic review and pooled analysis
    Guidozzi, Nadia
    Wiggins, Tom
    Ahmed, Ahmed R.
    Hanna, George B.
    Markar, Sheraz R.
    DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2019, 32 (09)
  • [40] Esophageal Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation as a Novel Approach to Post-bariatric Surgery Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
    Kuckelman, John P.
    Phillips, Cody J.
    Derickson, Michael J.
    Faler, Byron J.
    Martin, Matthew J.
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2018, 28 (10) : 3080 - 3086