Safety profile of magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease

被引:1
|
作者
Froiio, Caterina [1 ]
Aiolfi, Alberto [2 ]
Bona, Davide [2 ]
Bonavina, Luigi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Dept Biomed Sci Hlth, Div Gen & Foregut Surg, IRCCS Policlin San Donato, Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Milan, Dept Biomed Sci Hlth, Div Gen Surg, IRCCS Galeazzi St Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
来源
FRONTIERS IN SURGERY | 2023年 / 10卷
关键词
magnetic sphincter augmentation device; LINX; erosion; dysphagia; MSA removal; gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD); LOWER ESOPHAGEAL SPHINCTER; MANAGEMENT-SYSTEM; DEVICE; EFFICACY; REMOVAL;
D O I
10.3389/fsurg.2023.1293270
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) procedure is an effective treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Adverse events requiring MSA device removal are rare, but the true prevalence and incidence may be underestimated.Methods: Retrospective study on a prospectively collected database. Patients who underwent MSA procedure between March 2007 and September 2021 in two tertiary-care referral centers for esophageal surgery were included. The trend of MSA explant, the changes in the sizing technique and crura repair over the years, the technique of explant, and the clinical outcomes of the revisional procedure were reviewed.Results: Out of 397 consecutive patients, 50 (12.4%) underwent MSA removal, with a median time to explant of 39.5 [IQR = 53.7] months. Main symptoms leading to removal were dysphagia (43.2%), heartburn (25%), and epigastric pain (13.6%). Erosion occurred in 2.5% of patients. Smaller (12- and 13-bead) devices were the ones most frequently explanted. The majority of the explants were performed laparoscopically with endoscopic assistance. There was no perioperative morbidity, and the median length of stay was 2.8 +/- 1.4 days. After 2014, changes in sizing technique and crura repair resulted in a decreased incidence of explants from 23% to 5% (p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis confirmed the protective role of added bead units [HR 0.06 (95% CI = 0.001-0.220); p < 0.000].Conclusion: Oversizing and full mediastinal dissection with posterior hiatoplasty may improve the outcomes of the MSA procedure and possibly reduce removal rates.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease after Failed Anti-Reflux Procedure
    Shemanski, Kimberly A.
    Alicuben, Evan T.
    Samaan, Jamil S.
    Bildzukewicz, Nikolai A.
    Samakar, Kamran
    Dobrowolsky, Adrian
    Liu, Jeffrey Y.
    Houghton, Caitlin C.
    Sandhu, Kulmeet
    Lipham, John C.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2018, 227 (04) : E72 - E72
  • [22] Magnetic sphincter augmentation device placement for treatment of gastroesophageal reflux
    Laird, Jason
    JAAPA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PHYSICIAN ASSISTANTS, 2020, 33 (12): : 30 - 32
  • [23] Magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux in overweight and obese patients
    Vivek, Anjali
    Latorre-Rodriguez, Andres R.
    Mittal, Sumeet K.
    DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2023, 36
  • [24] Is Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation a More Reproducible Procedure than Fundoplication for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease?
    Reynolds, Jessica
    Bildzukewicz, Nikolai
    Rona, Kais
    Louie, Brian E.
    Warren, Heather F.
    Taiganides, Paul
    Doggett, Stephanie
    Buckley, Francis P.
    Lipham, John
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 150 (04) : S1250 - S1250
  • [25] Characterization of Dysphagia after Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation Device Placement for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
    Alicuben, Evan T.
    Tatum, James M.
    Samaan, Jamil S.
    Bildzukewicz, Nikolai A.
    Samakar, Kamran
    Houghton, Caitlin C.
    Stone, Gregory
    Sandhu, Kulmeet
    Dobrowolsky, Adrian
    Lipham, John C.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2018, 227 (04) : S16 - S16
  • [26] Magnetic sphincter augmentation is an effective treatment for atypical symptoms caused by gastroesophageal reflux disease
    Ward, Marc A.
    Ebrahim, Ahmed
    Kopita, Jeffrey
    Arviso, Lindsay
    Ogola, Gerald O.
    Buckmaster, Brittany
    Leeds, Steven G.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 34 (11): : 4909 - 4915
  • [27] Six to 12-year outcomes of magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease
    Davide Ferrari
    Emanuele Asti
    Veronica Lazzari
    Stefano Siboni
    Daniele Bernardi
    Luigi Bonavina
    Scientific Reports, 10
  • [28] Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Management Following Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
    Treitl, Daniela
    Ben-David, Kfir
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 150 (04) : S1186 - S1187
  • [29] Longer-term outcomes of gastroesophageal reflux disease treated with magnetic sphincter augmentation
    Puri, Aiysha
    Steven, Sue
    Markar, Sheraz R.
    Boyle, Nicholas
    DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2023, 36 (10)
  • [30] Magnetic sphincter augmentation is an effective treatment for atypical symptoms caused by gastroesophageal reflux disease
    Marc A. Ward
    Ahmed Ebrahim
    Jeffrey Kopita
    Lindsay Arviso
    Gerald O. Ogola
    Brittany Buckmaster
    Steven G. Leeds
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2020, 34 : 4909 - 4915