Laparoscopic magnetic sphincter augmentation versus fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: systematic review and pooled analysis

被引:33
|
作者
Guidozzi, Nadia [1 ]
Wiggins, Tom [1 ]
Ahmed, Ahmed R. [1 ]
Hanna, George B. [1 ]
Markar, Sheraz R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Dept Surg & Canc, London, England
关键词
fundoplication; gastroesophageal reflux disease; magnetic sphincter augmentation; NISSEN FUNDOPLICATION; MANAGEMENT-SYSTEM; OUTCOMES; COMPLICATIONS; MULTICENTER; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1093/dote/doz031
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) has been proposed as a less invasive, more appealing alternative intervention to fundoplication for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes following MSA for GERD control in comparison with laparoscopic fundoplication. A systematic electronic search for articles was performed in Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library for single-arm cohort studies or comparative studies (with fundoplication) evaluating the use of MSA. A random-effects meta-analysis for postoperative proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use, GERD-health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQOL), gas bloating, ability to belch, dysphagia, and reoperation was performed. The systematic review identified 6 comparative studies of MSA versus fundoplication and 13 single-cohort studies. Following MSA, only 13.2% required postoperative PPI therapy, 7.8% dilatation, 3.3% device removal or reoperation, and esophageal erosion was seen in 0.3%. There was no significant difference between the groups in requirement for postoperative PPI therapy (pooled odds ratio, POR = 1.08; 95%CI 0.40-2.95), GERD-HRQOL score (weighted mean difference, WMD= 0.34; 95%CI -0.70-1.37), dysphagia (POR = 0.94; 95%CI 0.57-1.55), and reoperation (POR = 1.23; 95%CI 0.26-5.8). However, when compared to fundoplicationMSA was associated with significantly less gas bloating (POR = 0.34; 95%CI 0.16-0.71) and a greater ability to belch (POR = 12.34; 95%CI 6.43-23.7). In conclusion, magnetic sphincter augmentation achieves good GERD symptomatic control similar to that of fundoplication, with the benefit of less gas bloating. The safety of MSA also appears acceptable with only 3.3% of patients requiring device removal. There is an urgent need for randomized data directly comparing fundoplication with MSA for the treatment of GERD to truly evaluate the efficacy of this treatment approach.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Early results of magnetic sphincter augmentation versus fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Aiolfi, Alberto
    Asti, Emanuele
    Bernardi, Daniele
    Bonitta, Gianluca
    Rausa, Emanuele
    Siboni, Stefano
    Bonavina, Luigi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 52 : 82 - 88
  • [2] LINX® magnetic esophageal sphincter augmentation versus Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Skubleny, Daniel
    Switzer, Noah J.
    Dang, Jerry
    Gill, Richdeep S.
    Shi, Xinzhe
    de Gara, Christopher
    Birch, Daniel W.
    Wong, Clarence
    Hutter, Matthew M.
    Karmali, Shahzeer
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 31 (08): : 3078 - 3084
  • [3] LINX® magnetic esophageal sphincter augmentation versus Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Daniel Skubleny
    Noah J. Switzer
    Jerry Dang
    Richdeep S. Gill
    Xinzhe Shi
    Christopher de Gara
    Daniel W. Birch
    Clarence Wong
    Matthew M. Hutter
    Shahzeer Karmali
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2017, 31 : 3078 - 3084
  • [4] Magnetic sphincter augmentation versus fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: pros and cons
    Sterris, Jason A.
    Dunn, Colin P.
    Bildzukewicz, Nikolai A.
    Lipham, John C.
    CURRENT OPINION IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 36 (04) : 323 - 328
  • [5] Ambulatory laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review
    Mariette, Christophe
    Pessaux, Patrick
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2011, 25 (09): : 2859 - 2864
  • [6] Ambulatory laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review
    Christophe Mariette
    Patrick Pessaux
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2011, 25 : 2859 - 2864
  • [7] Efficacy of Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation versus Nissen Fundoplication for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Short Term: A Meta-Analysis
    Chen, Ming-yu
    Huang, Di-yu
    Wu, Angela
    Zhu, Yi-bin
    Zhu, He-pan
    Lin, Liu-mei
    Cai, Xiu-jun
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2017, 2017
  • [8] Is Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation a More Reproducible Procedure than Fundoplication for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease?
    Reynolds, Jessica
    Bildzukewicz, Nikolai
    Rona, Kais
    Louie, Brian E.
    Warren, Heather F.
    Taiganides, Paul
    Doggett, Stephanie
    Buckley, Francis P.
    Lipham, John
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 150 (04) : S1250 - S1250
  • [9] Magnetic sphincter augmentation in treating refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhuang, Qian Jun
    Tan, Nian Di
    Chen, Song Feng
    Zhang, Meng Yu
    Xiao, Ying Lian
    JOURNAL OF DIGESTIVE DISEASES, 2021, 22 (12) : 695 - 705
  • [10] Laparoscopic alternatives to fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux: the role of magnetic augmentation and electrical stimulation of the lower esophageal sphincter
    Bonavina, L.
    Attwood, S.
    DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2016, 29 (08): : 996 - 1001