Laparoscopic magnetic sphincter augmentation versus fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: systematic review and pooled analysis

被引:33
|
作者
Guidozzi, Nadia [1 ]
Wiggins, Tom [1 ]
Ahmed, Ahmed R. [1 ]
Hanna, George B. [1 ]
Markar, Sheraz R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Dept Surg & Canc, London, England
关键词
fundoplication; gastroesophageal reflux disease; magnetic sphincter augmentation; NISSEN FUNDOPLICATION; MANAGEMENT-SYSTEM; OUTCOMES; COMPLICATIONS; MULTICENTER; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1093/dote/doz031
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) has been proposed as a less invasive, more appealing alternative intervention to fundoplication for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes following MSA for GERD control in comparison with laparoscopic fundoplication. A systematic electronic search for articles was performed in Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library for single-arm cohort studies or comparative studies (with fundoplication) evaluating the use of MSA. A random-effects meta-analysis for postoperative proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use, GERD-health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQOL), gas bloating, ability to belch, dysphagia, and reoperation was performed. The systematic review identified 6 comparative studies of MSA versus fundoplication and 13 single-cohort studies. Following MSA, only 13.2% required postoperative PPI therapy, 7.8% dilatation, 3.3% device removal or reoperation, and esophageal erosion was seen in 0.3%. There was no significant difference between the groups in requirement for postoperative PPI therapy (pooled odds ratio, POR = 1.08; 95%CI 0.40-2.95), GERD-HRQOL score (weighted mean difference, WMD= 0.34; 95%CI -0.70-1.37), dysphagia (POR = 0.94; 95%CI 0.57-1.55), and reoperation (POR = 1.23; 95%CI 0.26-5.8). However, when compared to fundoplicationMSA was associated with significantly less gas bloating (POR = 0.34; 95%CI 0.16-0.71) and a greater ability to belch (POR = 12.34; 95%CI 6.43-23.7). In conclusion, magnetic sphincter augmentation achieves good GERD symptomatic control similar to that of fundoplication, with the benefit of less gas bloating. The safety of MSA also appears acceptable with only 3.3% of patients requiring device removal. There is an urgent need for randomized data directly comparing fundoplication with MSA for the treatment of GERD to truly evaluate the efficacy of this treatment approach.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease
    Ritter, DW
    Vanderpool, D
    Westmoreland, M
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1997, 174 (06): : 715 - 718
  • [42] Endoscopic plication compared to laparoscopic fundoplication in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hajjar, Alexander
    Verhoeff, Kevin
    Jogiat, Uzair
    Mocanu, Valentin
    Birch, Daniel W.
    Switzer, Noah J.
    Wong, Clarence
    Karmali, Shahzeer
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 37 (08): : 5791 - 5806
  • [43] Success of laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease
    Landreneau, RJ
    Wiechmann, RJ
    Hazelrigg, SR
    Santucci, TS
    Boley, TM
    Magee, MJ
    Naunheim, KS
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1998, 66 (06): : 1886 - 1892
  • [44] Endoscopic plication compared to laparoscopic fundoplication in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Alexander Hajjar
    Kevin Verhoeff
    Uzair Jogiat
    Valentin Mocanu
    Daniel W. Birch
    Noah J. Switzer
    Clarence Wong
    Shahzeer Karmali
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2023, 37 : 5791 - 5806
  • [45] Revaluation of the efficacy of magnetic sphincter augmentation for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease
    Zhang, Hongke
    Dong, Dinghui
    Liu, Zhengwen
    He, Shuixiang
    Hu, Liangshuo
    Lv, Yi
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2016, 30 (09): : 3684 - 3690
  • [46] Postoperative Dysphagia Following Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
    Tsai, Catherine
    Steffen, Rudolf
    Kessler, Ulf
    Merki, Hans
    Lipham, John
    Zehetner, Joerg
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2020, 30 (04): : 322 - 326
  • [47] Revaluation of the efficacy of magnetic sphincter augmentation for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease
    Hongke Zhang
    Dinghui Dong
    Zhengwen Liu
    Shuixiang He
    Liangshuo Hu
    Yi Lv
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2016, 30 : 3684 - 3690
  • [48] Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation Placement for Recalcitrant Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Following Bariatric Procedures: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Meta-Analysis
    Rausa, Emanuele
    Manfredi, Roberto
    Kelly, Michael Eamon
    Bianco, Federica
    Aiolfi, Alberto
    Bonitta, Gianluca
    Lucianetti, Alessandro
    Zappa, Marco Antonio
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2021, 31 (09): : 1034 - 1039
  • [49] Systematic review:Laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease in partial responders to proton pump inhibitors
    Lars Lundell
    Martin Bell
    Magnus Ruth
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2014, 20 (03) : 804 - 813
  • [50] Systematic review: Laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease in partial responders to proton pump inhibitors
    Lundell, Lars
    Bell, Martin
    Ruth, Magnus
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 20 (03) : 804 - 813