Validation of a French version of the Breakthrough Pain Assessment Tool in cancer patients: Factorial structure, reliability and responsiveness

被引:1
|
作者
Perceau-Chambard, Elise [1 ]
Roche, Sylvain [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Tricou, Colombe [1 ]
Mercier, Catherine [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Barbaret, Cecile [6 ]
Davies, Andrew [7 ]
Webber, Katherine [7 ]
Filbet, Marilene [1 ]
Economos, Guillaume Pierre Serge [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Civils Lyon, Hop Lyon Sud, Palliat Care Ctr, Lyon, France
[2] Hosp Civils Lyon, Serv Biostat Bioinformat, Pole Sante Publ, Lyon, France
[3] Equipe Biostat Sante, Lab Biometrie & Biol Evolut, Villeurbanne, France
[4] Univ Lyon, Lyon, France
[5] Univ Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France
[6] Ctr Hosp Univ Grenoble, Palliat Care Unit, La Tronche, France
[7] Imperial Coll London, London, England
来源
PLOS ONE | 2023年 / 18卷 / 07期
关键词
MANAGEMENT; QUALITY; DETERMINANTS; ASSOCIATION; PREVALENCE; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0286947
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
ObjectiveBreakthrough cancer pain should be properly assessed for better-personalized treatment plan. The Breakthrough Pain Assessment Tool is a 14-item tool validated in English developed for this purpose; no French version is currently available and validated. This study aimed to translate it in French and assess the psychometric properties of a French version of the Breakthrough Pain Assessment Tool (BAT-FR). MethodsFirst, translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the 14 items (9 ordinal and 5 nominal) of the original BAT tool in French language was made. Second, assessments of validity (convergent, divergent and discriminant validity), factorial structure (exploratory factor analysis) and test-retest reliability of the 9 ordinal items were done with data of 130 adult cancer patients suffering from breakthrough pain in a hospital-academic palliative care center. Test-retest reliability and responsiveness of total and dimension scores derived from these 9 items were also assessed. Acceptability of the 14 items was also assessed on the 130 patients. ResultsThe 14 items had good content and face validity. Convergent and divergent validity, discriminant validity and test-retest reliability of the ordinal items were acceptable. Test-retest reliability and responsiveness of total and dimensions derived from ordinal items were also acceptable. The factorial structure of the ordinal items had two dimensions similar to the original version: "1-pain severity and impact" and "2-pain duration and medication". Items 2 and 8 had a low contribution to the dimension 1 they were assigned and item 14 clearly changed of dimension compared with the original tool. The acceptability of the 14 items was good. ConclusionThe BAT-FR has shown acceptable validity, reliability and responsiveness supporting its use for assessing breakthrough cancer pain in French-speaking populations. Its structure needs nevertheless further confirmation.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Validation of the Dutch version of the Hip Outcome Score; validity, reliability, and responsiveness in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome
    Roling, Maarten A.
    Hesseling, Brechtje
    Jansen, Sebastiaan P. L.
    Bloem, Rolf M.
    Mathijssen, Nina M. C.
    JOURNAL OF HIP PRESERVATION SURGERY, 2022, 8 (03): : 298 - 304
  • [42] Revision and Validation of a Medication Assessment Tool for Chronic Cancer Pain Management
    Salmany, Sewar S.
    Koopmans, Sara M.
    Treish, Imad M.
    El Jaber, Rana
    Telfah, Shorouq
    Tuffaha, Haitham W.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2012, 29 (08): : 640 - 646
  • [43] Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Japanese version of the Patient-Specific Functional Scale in patients with neck pain
    Koji Nakamaru
    Junya Aizawa
    Takayuki Koyama
    Osamu Nitta
    European Spine Journal, 2015, 24 : 2816 - 2820
  • [44] Reliability and responsiveness of the Dutch version of the Neck Disability Index in patients with acute neck pain in general practice
    Cees J. Vos
    Arianne P. Verhagen
    Bart W. Koes
    European Spine Journal, 2006, 15 : 1729 - 1736
  • [45] Reliability and responsiveness of the Dutch version of the Neck Disability Index in patients with acute neck pain in general practice
    Vos, Cees J.
    Verhagen, Arianne P.
    Koes, Bart W.
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2006, 15 (11) : 1729 - 1736
  • [46] Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Japanese version of the Patient-Specific Functional Scale in patients with neck pain
    Nakamaru, Koji
    Aizawa, Junya
    Koyama, Takayuki
    Nitta, Osamu
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2015, 24 (12) : 2816 - 2820
  • [47] Assessment and management of breakthrough pain in cancer patients: Current approaches and emerging research
    Neil A. Hagen
    Patricia Biondo
    Carla Stiles
    Current Pain and Headache Reports, 2008, 12 : 241 - 248
  • [48] Assessment and management of breakthrough pain in cancer patients: Current approaches and emerging research
    Hagen, Neil A.
    Biondo, Patricia
    Stiles, Carla
    CURRENT PAIN AND HEADACHE REPORTS, 2008, 12 (04) : 241 - 248
  • [49] The Chinese Version of the Breast Cancer Literacy Assessment Tool: Translation, Adaptation, and Validation Study
    Shan, Yi
    Ji, Meng
    JMIR FORMATIVE RESEARCH, 2023, 7
  • [50] Validation of the Korean version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale in patients with chronic non-cancer pain
    Cho, Sungkun
    Kim, Hye-Young
    Lee, Jang-Han
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2013, 22 (07) : 1767 - 1772