Validation of a French version of the Breakthrough Pain Assessment Tool in cancer patients: Factorial structure, reliability and responsiveness

被引:1
|
作者
Perceau-Chambard, Elise [1 ]
Roche, Sylvain [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Tricou, Colombe [1 ]
Mercier, Catherine [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Barbaret, Cecile [6 ]
Davies, Andrew [7 ]
Webber, Katherine [7 ]
Filbet, Marilene [1 ]
Economos, Guillaume Pierre Serge [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Civils Lyon, Hop Lyon Sud, Palliat Care Ctr, Lyon, France
[2] Hosp Civils Lyon, Serv Biostat Bioinformat, Pole Sante Publ, Lyon, France
[3] Equipe Biostat Sante, Lab Biometrie & Biol Evolut, Villeurbanne, France
[4] Univ Lyon, Lyon, France
[5] Univ Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France
[6] Ctr Hosp Univ Grenoble, Palliat Care Unit, La Tronche, France
[7] Imperial Coll London, London, England
来源
PLOS ONE | 2023年 / 18卷 / 07期
关键词
MANAGEMENT; QUALITY; DETERMINANTS; ASSOCIATION; PREVALENCE; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0286947
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
ObjectiveBreakthrough cancer pain should be properly assessed for better-personalized treatment plan. The Breakthrough Pain Assessment Tool is a 14-item tool validated in English developed for this purpose; no French version is currently available and validated. This study aimed to translate it in French and assess the psychometric properties of a French version of the Breakthrough Pain Assessment Tool (BAT-FR). MethodsFirst, translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the 14 items (9 ordinal and 5 nominal) of the original BAT tool in French language was made. Second, assessments of validity (convergent, divergent and discriminant validity), factorial structure (exploratory factor analysis) and test-retest reliability of the 9 ordinal items were done with data of 130 adult cancer patients suffering from breakthrough pain in a hospital-academic palliative care center. Test-retest reliability and responsiveness of total and dimension scores derived from these 9 items were also assessed. Acceptability of the 14 items was also assessed on the 130 patients. ResultsThe 14 items had good content and face validity. Convergent and divergent validity, discriminant validity and test-retest reliability of the ordinal items were acceptable. Test-retest reliability and responsiveness of total and dimensions derived from ordinal items were also acceptable. The factorial structure of the ordinal items had two dimensions similar to the original version: "1-pain severity and impact" and "2-pain duration and medication". Items 2 and 8 had a low contribution to the dimension 1 they were assigned and item 14 clearly changed of dimension compared with the original tool. The acceptability of the 14 items was good. ConclusionThe BAT-FR has shown acceptable validity, reliability and responsiveness supporting its use for assessing breakthrough cancer pain in French-speaking populations. Its structure needs nevertheless further confirmation.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Correction: Linguistic-cultural validation of a French version of the oral health assessment tool
    Lucie Rapp
    Jean-Noel Vergnes
    Paul Monsarrat
    Philippe Kémoun
    Laurent Balardy
    Marie-Hélène Lacoste-Ferré
    BMC Oral Health, 25 (1)
  • [32] A French version of the AttrakDiff scale: Translation and validation study of a user experience assessment tool
    Lallemand, C.
    Koenig, V.
    Gronier, G.
    Martin, R.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE EUROPEENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE APPLIQUEE, 2015, 65 (05): : 239 - 252
  • [33] Pain Assessment in Critically Ill Adult Patients: Validity and Reliability Research of the Turkish Version of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool
    Gundogan, Onur
    Bor, Canan
    Korhan, Esra Akin
    Demirag, Kubilay
    Uyar, Mehmet
    JOURNAL OF THE TURKISH SOCIETY OF INTENSIVE CARE-TURK YOGUN BAKM DERNEGI DERGISI, 2016, 14 (03): : 93 - 99
  • [34] Validation of the French Version of the "Patterns of Activity Measure" in Patients with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain
    Benaim, Charles
    Leger, Bertrand
    Vuistiner, Philippe
    Luthi, Francois
    PAIN RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT, 2017, 2017
  • [35] Reliability and validity of a Japanese version of the psychosocial assessment tool for families of children with cancer
    Tsumura, Akemi
    Okuyama, Toru
    Ito, Yoshinori
    Kondo, Masaki
    Saitoh, Shinji
    Kamei, Michi
    Sato, Iori
    Ishida, Yuji
    Kato, Yuka
    Takeda, Yoshimi
    Akechi, Tatsuo
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 50 (03) : 296 - 302
  • [36] Validation of a postoperative parental pain assessment tool in a French-speaking population
    Rufenacht, M.
    Lopez, U.
    Habre, W.
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2014, 144 : 3S - 3S
  • [37] Development, validation and psychometric properties of a diagnostic/prognostic tool for breakthrough pain in mixed chronic-pain patients
    Dekel, Boaz Gedaliahu Samolsky
    Remondini, Francesca
    Gori, Alberto
    Vasarri, Alessio
    Di Nino, GianFranco
    Melotti, Rita Maria
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 141 : 23 - 29
  • [38] Reliability and validity of the evaluation of Korean cancer pain assessment tool (KCPAT)
    Choi, YS
    Lee, J
    Park, JN
    Lee, MA
    Yeom, CH
    Kim, JS
    Hong, YS
    Jang, SK
    JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE CARE, 2004, 20 (03) : 241 - 241
  • [39] VALIDATION OF THE FRENCH VERSION OF HADS IN A SAMPLING OF HOSPITALIZED CANCER-PATIENTS
    RAZAVI, D
    DELVAUX, N
    FARVACQUES, C
    ROBAYE, E
    REVUE DE PSYCHOLOGIE APPLIQUEE, 1989, 39 (04): : 295 - 308
  • [40] The Danish version of the questionnaire on pain communication: preliminary validation in cancer patients
    Jacobsen, R.
    Moldrup, C.
    Christrup, L.
    Sjogren, P.
    Hansen, O. B.
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2009, 53 (06) : 807 - 815