Validation of a French version of the Breakthrough Pain Assessment Tool in cancer patients: Factorial structure, reliability and responsiveness

被引:1
|
作者
Perceau-Chambard, Elise [1 ]
Roche, Sylvain [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Tricou, Colombe [1 ]
Mercier, Catherine [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Barbaret, Cecile [6 ]
Davies, Andrew [7 ]
Webber, Katherine [7 ]
Filbet, Marilene [1 ]
Economos, Guillaume Pierre Serge [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Civils Lyon, Hop Lyon Sud, Palliat Care Ctr, Lyon, France
[2] Hosp Civils Lyon, Serv Biostat Bioinformat, Pole Sante Publ, Lyon, France
[3] Equipe Biostat Sante, Lab Biometrie & Biol Evolut, Villeurbanne, France
[4] Univ Lyon, Lyon, France
[5] Univ Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France
[6] Ctr Hosp Univ Grenoble, Palliat Care Unit, La Tronche, France
[7] Imperial Coll London, London, England
来源
PLOS ONE | 2023年 / 18卷 / 07期
关键词
MANAGEMENT; QUALITY; DETERMINANTS; ASSOCIATION; PREVALENCE; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0286947
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
ObjectiveBreakthrough cancer pain should be properly assessed for better-personalized treatment plan. The Breakthrough Pain Assessment Tool is a 14-item tool validated in English developed for this purpose; no French version is currently available and validated. This study aimed to translate it in French and assess the psychometric properties of a French version of the Breakthrough Pain Assessment Tool (BAT-FR). MethodsFirst, translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the 14 items (9 ordinal and 5 nominal) of the original BAT tool in French language was made. Second, assessments of validity (convergent, divergent and discriminant validity), factorial structure (exploratory factor analysis) and test-retest reliability of the 9 ordinal items were done with data of 130 adult cancer patients suffering from breakthrough pain in a hospital-academic palliative care center. Test-retest reliability and responsiveness of total and dimension scores derived from these 9 items were also assessed. Acceptability of the 14 items was also assessed on the 130 patients. ResultsThe 14 items had good content and face validity. Convergent and divergent validity, discriminant validity and test-retest reliability of the ordinal items were acceptable. Test-retest reliability and responsiveness of total and dimensions derived from ordinal items were also acceptable. The factorial structure of the ordinal items had two dimensions similar to the original version: "1-pain severity and impact" and "2-pain duration and medication". Items 2 and 8 had a low contribution to the dimension 1 they were assigned and item 14 clearly changed of dimension compared with the original tool. The acceptability of the 14 items was good. ConclusionThe BAT-FR has shown acceptable validity, reliability and responsiveness supporting its use for assessing breakthrough cancer pain in French-speaking populations. Its structure needs nevertheless further confirmation.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Translation and Validation of a French Language Version of the Cornell Assessment Pediatric Delirium Tool
    De Cloedt, L.
    Harrington, K.
    Du Pont-Thibodeau, G.
    Ducharme-Crevier, L.
    MEDECINE INTENSIVE REANIMATION, 2019, 28 (05): : 418 - 423
  • [22] Linguistic-cultural validation of a French version of the oral health assessment tool
    Rapp Lucie
    Vergnes Jean-Noel
    Monsarrat Paul
    Kémoun Philippe
    Balardy Laurent
    Lacoste-Ferré Marie-Hélène
    BMC Oral Health, 25 (1)
  • [23] Validation of the French version of the Dallas Pain Questionnaire in chronic low back pain patients
    Marty, M
    Blotman, F
    Avouac, B
    Rozenberg, S
    Valat, JP
    REVUE DU RHUMATISME, 1998, 65 (02): : 126 - 134
  • [24] Validation of the Spanish Version of the Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT) in Pediatric Cancer
    Kazak, Anne E.
    Hwang, Wei-Ting
    Chen, Fang Fang
    Askins, Martha A.
    Carlson, Olivia
    Argueta-Ortiz, Francisco
    Vega, Gabriela
    Barakat, Lamia P.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 43 (10) : 1104 - 1113
  • [25] A Turkish Version of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool: Reliability and Validity Assessment
    Aktas, Yesim Yaman
    Karabulut, Neziha
    JOURNAL OF PERIANESTHESIA NURSING, 2017, 32 (04) : 341 - 351
  • [26] Reliability and responsiveness of the fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire; validation of the Norwegian version among patients with acute and chronic low back pain
    Grotle, M
    Brox, J
    Vollestad, NK
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2005, 64 : 520 - 520
  • [27] Design and validation of a medication assessment tool for cancer pain management
    Hakonsen, Gro Dahlseng
    Hudson, Steve
    Loennechen, Thrina
    PHARMACY WORLD & SCIENCE, 2006, 28 (06): : 342 - 351
  • [28] Design and validation of a medication assessment tool for cancer pain management
    Gro Dahlseng Håkonsen
    Steve Hudson
    Thrina Loennechen
    Pharmacy World and Science, 2006, 28
  • [29] Factorial Validity and Reliability of the Chinese Version of the Pain Vigilance and Awareness Questionnaire (ChPVAQ) in a Sample of Chinese Patients with Chronic Pain
    Wong, Wing S.
    McCracken, Lance M.
    Fielding, Richard
    PAIN MEDICINE, 2011, 12 (07) : 1018 - 1025
  • [30] A Validation of the French Version of the Attitudes to Aging Questionnaire (AAQ): Factor Structure, Reliability and Validity
    Marquet, Manon
    Missotten, Pierre
    Schroyen, Sarah
    van Sambeek, Iris
    van den Akker, Marjan
    Van den Broeke, Carine
    Buntinx, Frank
    Adam, Stephane
    PSYCHOLOGICA BELGICA, 2016, 56 (02) : 80 - 100