A novel classification of subaxial cervical hemivertebrae and associated surgical management

被引:1
|
作者
Wu, Jinhui [1 ]
Hu, Miao [1 ]
Tao, Zhengbo [1 ]
Zhou, Xin [1 ]
Jiang, Heng [1 ]
Lin, Tao [1 ]
Ma, Jun [2 ]
Gao, Rui [1 ]
Wang, Ce [1 ]
Zhou, Xuhui [1 ]
机构
[1] Changzheng Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Gen Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Shanghai, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN SURGERY | 2023年 / 10卷
关键词
cervical deformity; hemivertebra; surgical method; classification; reliability study; NATURAL-HISTORY; RESECTION; SCOLIOSIS;
D O I
10.3389/fsurg.2023.1123397
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
ObjectiveTo propose and validate a new classification of surgical methods for patients with subaxial cervical hemivertebrae. MethodThis article reviewed cases diagnosed with subaxial cervical hemivertebrae in our hospital from January 2008 to December 2019. The results of preoperative (initial visit), postoperative and/or final follow-up were assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, Neck Disability Index (NDI) score, spinal balance parameters, and Scoliosis Research Society-22 Questionnaire (SRS-22). We also performed a reliability study to assess this classification. ResultThe classification includes three types. Each type can be divided into two subtypes, and a preliminary algorithm is proposed. Type I: There is an obvious appearance deformity in the neck, there are hemivertebrae in the cervical spine, and only a single hemivertebra of the subaxial cervical hemivertebra needs to be resected. Type II: There is an obvious appearance deformity in the neck, there are hemivertebrae in the cervical spine, and multiple subaxial cervical hemivertebrae need to be removed. Type III: No apparent deformity in the neck, at least one subaxial cervical hemivertebra existed or Klipper-Feil syndrome. Each type is divided into two subtypes, A and B, according to whether the upper and lower adjacent vertebral bodies of the rescected hemivertebra(e) are fused. We propose corresponding treatment methods for different types. We included a total of 121 patients and reviewed the prognosis for each type of patient. All patients achieved satisfactory results. The reliability study showed that the mean interobserver agreement was 91.8% (89.3%-93.4%), and the kappa value was 0.845 (0.800-0.875). The intraobserver agreement ranged from 93.4% to 97.5%, with a mean kappa value of 0.929 (0.881 to 0.954). ConclusionIn our study, we proposed and validated a new classification of subaxial cervical hemivertebrae and proposed corresponding treatment plans for different classifications.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Surgical management of ventrally based lower cervical (subaxial) meningiomas through the lateral approach: Report on 16 cases
    Aboul-Enein, Hisham Adel
    Khidr, Wael Mahmoud
    Abdeen, Khaled Mohamed
    Madawi, Aly Abo
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2015, 139 : 152 - 158
  • [42] Establishing the Injury Severity of Subaxial Cervical Spine Trauma Validating the Hierarchical Nature of the AO Spine Subaxial Cervical Spine Injury Classification System
    Schroeder, Gregory D.
    Canseco, Jose A.
    Patel, Parthik D.
    Divi, Srikanth N.
    Karamian, Brian A.
    Kandziora, Frank
    Vialle, Emiliano N.
    Oner, F. Cumhur
    Schnake, Klaus J.
    Dvorak, Marcel F.
    Chapman, Jens R.
    Benneker, Lorin M.
    Rajasekaran, Shanmuganathan
    Kepler, Christopher K.
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    SPINE, 2021, 46 (10) : 649 - 657
  • [43] Traumatic Cervical Spondyloptosis of the Subaxial Cervical Spine: A Case Series with a Literature Review and a New Classification
    Modi, Jayprakash Vrajlal
    Soman, Shardul Madhav
    Dalal, Shaival
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2016, 10 (06) : 1058 - 1064
  • [44] Morphometric evaluation of subaxial cervical vertebrae for surgical application of transpedicular screw fixation
    Bozbuga, M
    Ozturk, A
    Ari, Z
    Sahinoglu, K
    Bayraktar, B
    Cecen, A
    SPINE, 2004, 29 (17) : 1876 - 1880
  • [45] The Development and Evaluation of the Subaxial Injury Classification Scoring System for Cervical Spine Trauma
    Whang, Peter G.
    Patel, Alpesh A.
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2011, 469 (03) : 723 - 731
  • [46] Application of AOSpine Subaxial Cervical Spine Injury Classification in Simple and Complex Cases
    Aarabi, Bizhan
    Oner, Cumhur
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    Schroeder, Gregory D.
    Akhtar-Danesh, Noori
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2017, 31 : S24 - S32
  • [47] Cervical injuries scored according to the Subaxial Injury Classification system: An analysis of the literature
    Joaquim, Andrei F.
    Patel, Alpesh A.
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOVERTEBRAL JUNCTION AND SPINE, 2014, 5 (02): : 65 - 70
  • [48] Gynecomastia Classification for Surgical Management: A Systematic Review and Novel Classification System
    Waltho, Daniel
    Hatchell, Alexandra
    Thoma, Achilleas
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 139 (03) : 638E - 648E
  • [49] Gynecomastia Classification for Surgical Management: A Systematic Review and Novel Classification System
    Ciancio, Francesco
    Innocenti, Alessandro
    Parisi, Domenico
    Portincasa, Aurelio
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 140 (04) : 620E - 621E
  • [50] Subaxial cervical juxtafacet cysts: single institution surgical experience and literature review
    Timothy Uschold
    Jaykar Panchmatia
    David J. Fusco
    Adib A. Abla
    Randall W. Porter
    Nicholas Theodore
    Acta Neurochirurgica, 2013, 155 : 299 - 308