A novel classification of subaxial cervical hemivertebrae and associated surgical management

被引:1
|
作者
Wu, Jinhui [1 ]
Hu, Miao [1 ]
Tao, Zhengbo [1 ]
Zhou, Xin [1 ]
Jiang, Heng [1 ]
Lin, Tao [1 ]
Ma, Jun [2 ]
Gao, Rui [1 ]
Wang, Ce [1 ]
Zhou, Xuhui [1 ]
机构
[1] Changzheng Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Gen Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Shanghai, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN SURGERY | 2023年 / 10卷
关键词
cervical deformity; hemivertebra; surgical method; classification; reliability study; NATURAL-HISTORY; RESECTION; SCOLIOSIS;
D O I
10.3389/fsurg.2023.1123397
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
ObjectiveTo propose and validate a new classification of surgical methods for patients with subaxial cervical hemivertebrae. MethodThis article reviewed cases diagnosed with subaxial cervical hemivertebrae in our hospital from January 2008 to December 2019. The results of preoperative (initial visit), postoperative and/or final follow-up were assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, Neck Disability Index (NDI) score, spinal balance parameters, and Scoliosis Research Society-22 Questionnaire (SRS-22). We also performed a reliability study to assess this classification. ResultThe classification includes three types. Each type can be divided into two subtypes, and a preliminary algorithm is proposed. Type I: There is an obvious appearance deformity in the neck, there are hemivertebrae in the cervical spine, and only a single hemivertebra of the subaxial cervical hemivertebra needs to be resected. Type II: There is an obvious appearance deformity in the neck, there are hemivertebrae in the cervical spine, and multiple subaxial cervical hemivertebrae need to be removed. Type III: No apparent deformity in the neck, at least one subaxial cervical hemivertebra existed or Klipper-Feil syndrome. Each type is divided into two subtypes, A and B, according to whether the upper and lower adjacent vertebral bodies of the rescected hemivertebra(e) are fused. We propose corresponding treatment methods for different types. We included a total of 121 patients and reviewed the prognosis for each type of patient. All patients achieved satisfactory results. The reliability study showed that the mean interobserver agreement was 91.8% (89.3%-93.4%), and the kappa value was 0.845 (0.800-0.875). The intraobserver agreement ranged from 93.4% to 97.5%, with a mean kappa value of 0.929 (0.881 to 0.954). ConclusionIn our study, we proposed and validated a new classification of subaxial cervical hemivertebrae and proposed corresponding treatment plans for different classifications.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Subaxial injury classification system to determine the surgical approach for subaxial cervical spine injuries
    Dvorak, Marcel F.
    CURRENT ORTHOPAEDIC PRACTICE, 2008, 19 (04): : 407 - 410
  • [2] Classification and Management of Pediatric Subaxial Cervical Spine Injuries
    Madura, Casey J.
    Johnston, James M., Jr.
    NEUROSURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2017, 28 (01) : 91 - +
  • [3] ABCD Classification System A Novel Classification for Subaxial Cervical Spine Injuries
    Shousha, Mootaz
    SPINE, 2014, 39 (09) : 707 - 714
  • [4] Surgical Management of Subaxial Cervical Spine Trauma: A Case Report
    Aydin, Hasan Emre
    Ozbek, Zuhtu
    Vural, Murat
    Arslantas, Ali
    MEANDROS MEDICAL AND DENTAL JOURNAL, 2015, 16 (01): : 25 - 29
  • [5] A Novel and Reproducible Classification of the Vertebral Artery in the Subaxial Cervical Spine
    Winter, Fabian
    Okano, Ichiro
    Salzmann, Stephan N.
    Rentenberger, Colleen
    Shue, Jennifer
    Sama, Andrew A.
    Girardi, Federico P.
    Cammisa, Frank P., Jr.
    Hughes, Alexander P.
    OPERATIVE NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 18 (06) : 676 - 683
  • [6] Classification and Surgical Decision Making in Acute Subaxial Cervical Spine Trauma
    Patel, Alpesh A.
    Hurlbert, R. John
    Bono, Christopher M.
    Bessey, Jason T.
    Yang, Nuo
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    SPINE, 2010, 35 (21) : S228 - S234
  • [7] Subaxial cervical spine trauma classification: the Subaxial Injury Classification system and case examples
    Patel, Alpesh A.
    Dailey, Andrew
    Brodke, Darrel S.
    Daubs, Michael
    Anderson, Paul A.
    Hurlbert, R. John
    Vacccaro, Alexander R.
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2008, 25 (05)
  • [8] Neurological and Survival Outcomes After Surgical Management of Subaxial Cervical Spine Metastases
    Cho, Wonik
    Chang, Ung-Kyu
    SPINE, 2012, 37 (16) : E969 - E977
  • [9] Subaxial cervical foraminal chondromas: case-based discussion on surgical management
    Vandenbulcke, Alberto
    Sanjurjo, Andrea
    Rougemont, Anne-Laure
    Boudabbous, Sana
    Maduri, Rodolfo
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2024, 47 (01)
  • [10] The subaxial cervical spine injury classification system
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    Hulbert, John
    Patel, Alpesh A.
    Fisher, Charles
    Dvorak, Marcel
    Lehman, Ronald A.
    Anderson, Paul
    Harrop, James
    Oner, F. C.
    Arnold, Paul
    Fehlings, Michael
    Hedlund, Rune
    Madrazo, Ignacio
    Rechtine, Glenn
    Aarabi, Bizhan
    Shainline, Mike
    SPINE, 2007, 32 (21) : 2365 - 2374