A novel classification of subaxial cervical hemivertebrae and associated surgical management

被引:1
|
作者
Wu, Jinhui [1 ]
Hu, Miao [1 ]
Tao, Zhengbo [1 ]
Zhou, Xin [1 ]
Jiang, Heng [1 ]
Lin, Tao [1 ]
Ma, Jun [2 ]
Gao, Rui [1 ]
Wang, Ce [1 ]
Zhou, Xuhui [1 ]
机构
[1] Changzheng Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Gen Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Shanghai, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN SURGERY | 2023年 / 10卷
关键词
cervical deformity; hemivertebra; surgical method; classification; reliability study; NATURAL-HISTORY; RESECTION; SCOLIOSIS;
D O I
10.3389/fsurg.2023.1123397
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
ObjectiveTo propose and validate a new classification of surgical methods for patients with subaxial cervical hemivertebrae. MethodThis article reviewed cases diagnosed with subaxial cervical hemivertebrae in our hospital from January 2008 to December 2019. The results of preoperative (initial visit), postoperative and/or final follow-up were assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, Neck Disability Index (NDI) score, spinal balance parameters, and Scoliosis Research Society-22 Questionnaire (SRS-22). We also performed a reliability study to assess this classification. ResultThe classification includes three types. Each type can be divided into two subtypes, and a preliminary algorithm is proposed. Type I: There is an obvious appearance deformity in the neck, there are hemivertebrae in the cervical spine, and only a single hemivertebra of the subaxial cervical hemivertebra needs to be resected. Type II: There is an obvious appearance deformity in the neck, there are hemivertebrae in the cervical spine, and multiple subaxial cervical hemivertebrae need to be removed. Type III: No apparent deformity in the neck, at least one subaxial cervical hemivertebra existed or Klipper-Feil syndrome. Each type is divided into two subtypes, A and B, according to whether the upper and lower adjacent vertebral bodies of the rescected hemivertebra(e) are fused. We propose corresponding treatment methods for different types. We included a total of 121 patients and reviewed the prognosis for each type of patient. All patients achieved satisfactory results. The reliability study showed that the mean interobserver agreement was 91.8% (89.3%-93.4%), and the kappa value was 0.845 (0.800-0.875). The intraobserver agreement ranged from 93.4% to 97.5%, with a mean kappa value of 0.929 (0.881 to 0.954). ConclusionIn our study, we proposed and validated a new classification of subaxial cervical hemivertebrae and proposed corresponding treatment plans for different classifications.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Surgical versus Nonsurgical Treatment of Subaxial Cervical Pedicle Fractures
    Awad, Basem I.
    Lubelski, Daniel
    Carmody, Margaret
    Mroz, Thomas E.
    Anderson, James S.
    Moore, Timothy A.
    Steinmetz, Michael P.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2014, 82 (05) : 855 - 865
  • [22] Classification in Brief: Subaxial Cervical Spine Injury Classification and Severity Score System
    Spitnale, Michael J.
    Grabowski, Gregory
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2020, 478 (10) : 2390 - 2398
  • [23] Comparison of the AOSpine subaxial cervical spine injury classification system and the Allen classification
    Toshiya Tachibana
    Keishi Maruo
    Fumihiro Arizumi
    Kazuki Kusuyama
    Kazuya Kishima
    Shinichi Yoshiya
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2019, 29 : 1395 - 1397
  • [24] Comparison of the AOSpine subaxial cervical spine injury classification system and the Allen classification
    Tachibana, Toshiya
    Maruo, Keishi
    Arizumi, Fumihiro
    Kusuyama, Kazuki
    Kishima, Kazuya
    Yoshiya, Shinichi
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2019, 29 (07): : 1395 - 1397
  • [25] Early outcome of surgical intervention in subaxial cervical spine injuries
    Satar, Abdul
    Wazir, Zahid
    Saeed, Muhammad
    Arif, Mohammad
    Inam, Mohammad
    JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2014, 64 (12) : S83 - S86
  • [26] Reliability of Allen Ferguson classification versus subaxial injury classification and severity scale for subaxial cervical spine injuries: a psychometrics study
    Kanagaraju, Vijayanth
    Yelamarthy, P. K. Karthik
    Chhabra, Harvinder Singh
    Shetty, Ajoy Prasad
    Nanda, Ankur
    Sangondimath, Gururaj M.
    Das, Kali Dutta
    Bansal, Murari Lal
    Mohapatra, Bibhudendu
    Patel, Nishit
    Abel, Rainer
    Tuli, Sagun
    Barros, Tarsissio
    Tandon, Vikas
    SPINAL CORD, 2019, 57 (01) : 26 - 32
  • [27] Congenital subaxial cervical subluxation presenting as a bilateral Erb’s palsy: surgical management, rehabilitation, and outcome
    Ravi Sankaran
    Rohan Shah
    Sajesh Menon
    Ashok Pillai
    Child's Nervous System, 2016, 32 : 849 - 855
  • [28] Congenital subaxial cervical subluxation presenting as a bilateral Erb's palsy: surgical management, rehabilitation, and outcome
    Sankaran, Ravi
    Shah, Rohan
    Menon, Sajesh
    Pillai, Ashok
    CHILDS NERVOUS SYSTEM, 2016, 32 (05) : 849 - 855
  • [29] Reliability of Allen Ferguson classification versus subaxial injury classification and severity scale for subaxial cervical spine injuries: a psychometrics study
    Vijayanth Kanagaraju
    P. K. Karthik Yelamarthy
    Harvinder Singh Chhabra
    Ajoy Prasad Shetty
    Ankur Nanda
    Gururaj M. Sangondimath
    Kali Dutta Das
    Murari Lal Bansal
    Bibhudendu Mohapatra
    Nishit Patel
    Rainer Abel
    Sagun Tuli
    Tarsissio Barros
    Vikas Tandon
    Spinal Cord, 2019, 57 : 26 - 32
  • [30] The surgical approach to subaxial cervical spine injuries -: An evidence-based algorithm based on the SLIC classification system
    Dvorak, Marcel F.
    Fisher, Charles G.
    Fehlings, Michael G.
    Rampersaud, Y. Raja
    Oener, F. C.
    Aarabi, Bizhan
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    SPINE, 2007, 32 (23) : 2620 - 2629