Validation of Three Models for Prediction of Blood Transfusion during Cesarean Delivery Admission

被引:0
|
作者
Bruno, Ann M. [1 ]
Federspiel, Jerome J. [2 ]
McGee, Paula [3 ]
Pacheco, Luis D. [4 ]
Saade, George R. [4 ]
Parry, Samuel [5 ]
Longo, Monica [6 ]
Tita, Alan T. N. [7 ]
Gyamfi-Bannerman, Cynthia [8 ]
Chauhan, Suneet P. [9 ]
Einerson, Brett D. [1 ]
Rood, Kara [10 ]
Rouse, Dwight J. [11 ]
Bailit, Jennifer [12 ]
Grobman, William A. [13 ]
Simhan, Hyagriv N. [14 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[2] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Durham, NC USA
[3] George Washington Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Biostat Ctr, Washington, DC USA
[4] Univ Texas Med Branch, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
[5] Univ Penn, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[6] Eunice Kennedy Shriver Natl Inst Child Hlth & Hum, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Bethesda, MD USA
[7] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Birmingham, AL USA
[8] Columbia Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, New York, NY USA
[9] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Childrens Mem Hermann Hosp, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[10] Ohio State Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[11] Brown Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[12] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, MetroHlth Med Syst, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[13] Northwestern Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Chicago, IL USA
[14] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
blood preparedness; CMQCC risk tool; external validation; prediction models; transfusion prediction; SEVERE POSTPARTUM HEMORRHAGE; RISK; PREPAREDNESS; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1055/a-2234-8171
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective Prediction of blood transfusion during delivery admission allows for clinical preparedness and risk mitigation. Although prediction models have been developed and adopted into practice, their external validation is limited. We aimed to evaluate the performance of three blood transfusion prediction models in a U.S. cohort of individuals undergoing cesarean delivery.Study Design This was a secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized trial of tranexamic acid for prevention of hemorrhage at time of cesarean delivery. Three models were considered: a categorical risk tool (California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative [CMQCC]) and two regression models (Ahmadzia et al and Albright et al). The primary outcome was intrapartum or postpartum red blood cell transfusion. The CMQCC algorithm was applied to the cohort with frequency of risk category (low, medium, high) and associated transfusion rates reported. For the regression models, the area under the receiver-operating curve (AUC) was calculated and a calibration curve plotted to evaluate each model's capacity to predict receipt of transfusion. The regression model outputs were statistically compared.Results Of 10,785 analyzed individuals, 3.9% received a red blood cell transfusion during delivery admission. The CMQCC risk tool categorized 1,970 (18.3%) individuals as low risk, 5,259 (48.8%) as medium risk, and 3,556 (33.0%) as high risk with corresponding transfusion rates of 2.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.5-2.9%), 2.2% (95% CI: 1.8-2.6%), and 7.5% (95% CI: 6.6-8.4%), respectively. The AUC for prediction of blood transfusion using the Ahmadzia and Albright models was 0.78 (95% CI: 0.76-0.81) and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.77-0.82), respectively ( p = 0.38 for difference). Calibration curves demonstrated overall agreement between the predicted probability and observed likelihood of blood transfusion.Conclusion Three models were externally validated for prediction of blood transfusion during cesarean delivery admission in this U.S. cohort. Overall, performance was moderate; model selection should be based on ease of application until a specific model with superior predictive ability is developed.
引用
收藏
页码:e3391 / e3400
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] MATERNAL BLOOD-PRESSURE CHANGES DURING CESAREAN DELIVERY
    BOBA, A
    SURGICAL FORUM, 1983, 34 : 489 - 492
  • [42] Estimating blood loss during cesarean delivery: A comparison of methods
    Gari, Abdulrahim
    Hussein, Khulood
    Daghestani, Mazin
    Aljuhani, Sarah
    Bukhari, Mahdya
    Alqahtani, Abrar
    Almarwani, Miznah
    JOURNAL OF TAIBAH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 17 (05): : 732 - 736
  • [43] Validation of a new protocol for prophylaxis of uterine atony during cesarean delivery
    Ramirez, A. S.
    Salgado, P.
    Schiraldi, R.
    Guasch, E.
    Gilsanz, F.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2014, 31 : 195 - 195
  • [44] Predicting peripartum blood transfusion in women undergoing cesarean delivery: A risk prediction model (vol 13, e0208417, 2018)
    Ahmadzia, Homa K.
    Phillips, Jaclyn M.
    James, Andra H.
    Rice, Madeline M.
    Amdur, Richard L.
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (01):
  • [45] Development and Validation of Predictive Models for Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery in China
    Bi, Shilei
    Zhang, Lizi
    Chen, Jingsi
    Huang, Lijun
    Zeng, Shanshan
    Jia, Jinping
    Wen, Suiwen
    Cao, Yinli
    Wang, Shaoshuai
    Xu, Xiaoyan
    Ling, Feng
    Zhao, Xianlan
    Zhao, Yangyu
    Zhu, Qiying
    Qi, Hongbo
    Zhang, Lanzhen
    Li, Hongtian
    Du, Lili
    Wang, Zhijian
    Chen, Dunjin
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2020, 26
  • [46] Videolaryngoscopy during Urgent Cesarean Delivery: Association with Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Admission
    King, Andrew
    Thompson, Julie-Ann
    Hart, Stewart
    Nossaman, Bobby
    SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 117 (08) : 494 - 497
  • [47] Validation of McCluskey Index for Massive Blood Transfusion Prediction in Liver Transplantation
    Justo, Iago
    Marcacuzco, Alberto
    Caso, Oscar
    Garcia-Conde, Maria
    Nutu, Anisa
    Lechuga, Isabel
    Manrique, Alejandro
    Calvo, Jorge
    Garcia-Sesma, Alvaro
    Loinaz, Carmelo
    Jimenez-Romero, Carlos
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2021, 53 (09) : 2698 - 2701
  • [48] Does information available at delivery improve the prediction of the vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) models? Validation in an independent patient cohort
    Costantine, Maged
    Fox, Karin
    Byers, Benjamin
    Mateus, Julio
    Pacheco, Luis Diego
    Hankins, Gary D. V.
    Grobman, William
    Saade, George
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 201 (06) : S248 - S248
  • [49] Skin markers and the prediction of intraabdominal adhesion during second Cesarean delivery
    Jaafar, Zainab Abdul Ameer
    Obeid, Reshed Zeki
    Salman, Dina Akeel
    GINEKOLOGIA POLSKA, 2019, 90 (06) : 325 - 330
  • [50] RETRACTED: Prediction and Evaluation of Machine Learning Algorithm for Prediction of Blood Transfusion during Cesarean Section and Analysis of Risk Factors of Hypothermia during Anesthesia Recovery (Retracted Article)
    Ren, Wei
    Li, Danmei
    Wang, Jia
    Zhang, Jinxi
    Fu, Zhongliang
    Yao, Yu
    COMPUTATIONAL AND MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 2022