Skin markers and the prediction of intraabdominal adhesion during second Cesarean delivery

被引:7
|
作者
Jaafar, Zainab Abdul Ameer [1 ]
Obeid, Reshed Zeki [2 ]
Salman, Dina Akeel [1 ]
机构
[1] Al Mustansiriya Univ, Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Baghdad, Iraq
[2] Al Anbar Univ, Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Ramadi 31001, Ramadi, Iraq
关键词
adhesions; caesarean section; abdominal scarf; striae gravidarum; SCAR CHARACTERISTICS; STRIAE GRAVIDARUM; PELVIC ADHESIONS; ASSOCIATION; SEVERITY; SECTION; OIL;
D O I
10.5603/GP.2019.0059
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: The aim of the present study has been to examine skin scar characteristics and striae gravidarum, considering the reliability of each for predicting adhesions in repeat Caesarean sections. Material and methods: Across-sectional study was done over a period of two years.One hundred pregnant women were invited to participate in the study. Preoperatively, abdominal scar features (according to the scar's appearance)and stria gravidarum were both recorded.Then, at the time of surgery, intraabdominal adhesions were graded according to the modified Nair's classification. Results: Among the skin markers, abdominal scar width (p = 0.001), depressed scar (p = 0.002) and striae colour grading (p = 0.0183) were found to have significant associations with intraabdominal adhesions; yet all were of low validity. Conclusions: Despite growing interest in the use of skin markers in the prediction of intraabdominal adhesions at the time of repeat CS, the present study demonstrates that these markers may not be reliable.
引用
收藏
页码:325 / 330
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Time between skin incision and delivery during cesarean
    Rossouw, Jana N.
    Hall, David
    Harvey, Justin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2013, 121 (01) : 82 - 85
  • [2] Skin-to-Skin Cesarean Delivery
    Duffy, Diane
    Conrad, Christine
    JOGNN-JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC GYNECOLOGIC AND NEONATAL NURSING, 2013, 42 : S40 - S40
  • [3] Cesarean delivery for the second twin
    Alexander, James M.
    Leveno, Kenneth J.
    Rouse, Dwight
    Landon, Mark B.
    Gilbert, Sharon A.
    Spong, Catherine Y.
    Varner, Michael W.
    Caritis, Steve N.
    Harper, Margaret
    Wapner, Ronald J.
    Sorokin, Yoram
    Miodovnik, Menachem
    O'Sullivan, Mary J.
    Sibai, Baha M.
    Langer, Oded
    Gabbe, Steven G.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 112 (04): : 748 - 752
  • [4] Comparison of the effect of skin closure materials on skin closure during cesarean delivery
    Huang, Ye
    Yin, Xinbo
    Wei, Junni
    Li, Suhong
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (06):
  • [5] Extraabdominal vs intraabdominal uterine repair at cesarean delivery: a metaanalysis
    Walsh, Colin A.
    Walsh, Stewart R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 200 (06) : 625.e1 - 625.e8
  • [6] Extraabdominal vs intraabdominal uterine repair at cesarean delivery: a metaanalysis
    Jacob, Claude-Emilie
    Pasquier, Jean-Charles
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 202 (04)
  • [7] The Significance of the Second Cesarean Delivery in the Reduction of Institutional Cesarean Delivery Rates
    Diejomaoh, Michael F. E.
    Al-Jassar, Waleed Fahad
    Bello, Zainab
    Karunakaran, Kavitha
    Mohammed, Asiya
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 125 : 15S - 15S
  • [8] The Relevance of the Second Cesarean Delivery in the Reduction of Institutional Cesarean Delivery Rates
    Diejomaoh, Michael F. E.
    Al-Jassar, Waleed
    Bello, Zainab
    Karunakaran, Kavitha
    Mohammed, Asiya
    MEDICAL PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE, 2018, 27 (06) : 555 - 561
  • [9] Risks during cesarean delivery after prolonging the second stage of labor
    Gimovsky, Alexis C.
    Pham, Amelie
    Ahmadzia, Homa K.
    Sparks, Andrew
    Petersen, Scott
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 222 (01) : S317 - S318
  • [10] Risks associated with cesarean delivery during prolonged second stage of labor
    Gimovsky, Alexis C.
    Pham, Amelie
    Ahmadzia, Homa K.
    Sparks, Andrew D.
    Petersen, Scott M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2021, 3 (01)