Validation of Three Models for Prediction of Blood Transfusion during Cesarean Delivery Admission

被引:0
|
作者
Bruno, Ann M. [1 ]
Federspiel, Jerome J. [2 ]
McGee, Paula [3 ]
Pacheco, Luis D. [4 ]
Saade, George R. [4 ]
Parry, Samuel [5 ]
Longo, Monica [6 ]
Tita, Alan T. N. [7 ]
Gyamfi-Bannerman, Cynthia [8 ]
Chauhan, Suneet P. [9 ]
Einerson, Brett D. [1 ]
Rood, Kara [10 ]
Rouse, Dwight J. [11 ]
Bailit, Jennifer [12 ]
Grobman, William A. [13 ]
Simhan, Hyagriv N. [14 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[2] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Durham, NC USA
[3] George Washington Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Biostat Ctr, Washington, DC USA
[4] Univ Texas Med Branch, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
[5] Univ Penn, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[6] Eunice Kennedy Shriver Natl Inst Child Hlth & Hum, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Bethesda, MD USA
[7] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Birmingham, AL USA
[8] Columbia Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, New York, NY USA
[9] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Childrens Mem Hermann Hosp, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[10] Ohio State Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[11] Brown Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[12] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, MetroHlth Med Syst, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[13] Northwestern Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Chicago, IL USA
[14] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
blood preparedness; CMQCC risk tool; external validation; prediction models; transfusion prediction; SEVERE POSTPARTUM HEMORRHAGE; RISK; PREPAREDNESS; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1055/a-2234-8171
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective Prediction of blood transfusion during delivery admission allows for clinical preparedness and risk mitigation. Although prediction models have been developed and adopted into practice, their external validation is limited. We aimed to evaluate the performance of three blood transfusion prediction models in a U.S. cohort of individuals undergoing cesarean delivery.Study Design This was a secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized trial of tranexamic acid for prevention of hemorrhage at time of cesarean delivery. Three models were considered: a categorical risk tool (California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative [CMQCC]) and two regression models (Ahmadzia et al and Albright et al). The primary outcome was intrapartum or postpartum red blood cell transfusion. The CMQCC algorithm was applied to the cohort with frequency of risk category (low, medium, high) and associated transfusion rates reported. For the regression models, the area under the receiver-operating curve (AUC) was calculated and a calibration curve plotted to evaluate each model's capacity to predict receipt of transfusion. The regression model outputs were statistically compared.Results Of 10,785 analyzed individuals, 3.9% received a red blood cell transfusion during delivery admission. The CMQCC risk tool categorized 1,970 (18.3%) individuals as low risk, 5,259 (48.8%) as medium risk, and 3,556 (33.0%) as high risk with corresponding transfusion rates of 2.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.5-2.9%), 2.2% (95% CI: 1.8-2.6%), and 7.5% (95% CI: 6.6-8.4%), respectively. The AUC for prediction of blood transfusion using the Ahmadzia and Albright models was 0.78 (95% CI: 0.76-0.81) and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.77-0.82), respectively ( p = 0.38 for difference). Calibration curves demonstrated overall agreement between the predicted probability and observed likelihood of blood transfusion.Conclusion Three models were externally validated for prediction of blood transfusion during cesarean delivery admission in this U.S. cohort. Overall, performance was moderate; model selection should be based on ease of application until a specific model with superior predictive ability is developed.
引用
收藏
页码:e3391 / e3400
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Predicting risk of blood transfusion during delivery
    Ahmadzia, Homa K.
    Amdur, Richard L.
    Berger, Jeffrey S.
    Macri, Charles J.
    Luban, Naomi L.
    Gimovsky, Alexis C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 218 (01) : S110 - S111
  • [22] Validation of the Prediction Model for Success of Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery
    Costantine, Maged M.
    Fox, Karin
    Byers, Benjamin D.
    Mateus, Julio
    Ghulmiyyah, Labib M.
    Blackwell, Sean
    Hankins, Gary D. V.
    Grobman, William A.
    Saade, George
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 114 (05): : 1029 - 1033
  • [23] Prediction Model for Massive Transfusion in Placenta Previa during Cesarean Section
    Kang, Jieun
    Kim, Hye Sim
    Lee, Eun Bi
    Uh, Young
    Han, Kyoung-Hee
    Park, Eun Young
    Lee, Hyang Ah
    Kang, Dae Ryong
    Chung, In-Bai
    Choi, Seong Jin
    YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 61 (02) : 154 - 160
  • [24] Does Information Available at Admission for Delivery Improve Prediction of Vaginal Birth after Cesarean?
    Grobman, William A.
    Lai, Yinglei
    Landon, Mark B.
    Spong, Catherine Y.
    Leveno, Kenneth J.
    Rouse, Dwight J.
    Varner, Michael W.
    Moawad, Atef H.
    Simhan, Hyagriv N.
    Harper, Margaret
    Wapner, Ronald J.
    Sorokin, Yoram
    Miodovnik, Menachem
    Carpenter, Marshall
    O'Sullivan, Mary J.
    Sibai, Baha M.
    Langer, Oded
    Thorp, John M.
    Ramin, Susan M.
    Mercer, Brian M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2009, 26 (10) : 693 - 701
  • [25] Blood gas analysis of placental and uterine blood during cesarean delivery
    Fujikura, T
    Yoshida, J
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 87 (01): : 133 - 136
  • [26] Development and validation of machine learning models for intraoperative blood transfusion prediction in severe lumbar disc herniation
    Liu, Qiang
    Chen, An-Tian
    Li, Runmin
    Yan, Liang
    Quan, Xubin
    Liu, Xiaozhu
    Zhang, Yang
    Xiang, Tianyu
    Zhang, Yingang
    Chen, Anfa
    Jiang, Hao
    Hou, Xuewen
    Xu, Qizhong
    He, Weiheng
    Chen, Liang
    Zhou, Xin
    Zhang, Qiang
    Huang, Wei
    Luan, Haopeng
    Song, Xinghua
    Yu, Xiaolin
    Xi, Xiangdong
    Wang, Kai
    Wu, Shi-Nan
    Liu, Wencai
    Zhang, Yusi
    Zheng, Jialiang
    Ding, Haizhen
    Xu, Chan
    Yin, Chengliang
    Hu, Zhaohui
    Qu, Baicheng
    Li, Wenle
    ISCIENCE, 2024, 27 (11)
  • [27] Clinical Experience with the Implementation of Accurate Measurement of Blood Loss during Cesarean Delivery: Influences on Hemorrhage Recognition and Allogeneic Transfusion
    Rubenstein, Andrew F.
    Zamudio, Stacy
    Al-Khan, Abdulla
    Douglas, Claudia
    Sledge, Sharon
    Tully, Griffeth
    Thurer, Robert L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2018, 35 (07) : 655 - 659
  • [28] Validation of a Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery Prediction Model in Women With Two Prior Cesarean Deliveries
    Metz, Torri D.
    Allshouse, Amanda A.
    Faucett, Allison M.
    Grobman, William A.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 125 (04): : 948 - 952
  • [29] Risk factors for blood transfusion in patients undergoing high-order Cesarean delivery
    Spiegelman, Jessica
    Mourad, Mirella
    Melka, Stephanie
    Gupta, Simi
    Lam-Rachlin, Jennifer
    Rebarber, Andrei
    Saltzman, Daniel H.
    Fox, Nathan S.
    TRANSFUSION, 2017, 57 (11) : 2752 - 2757
  • [30] Risk factors for blood transfusion in patients undergoing high-order cesarean delivery
    Fox, Nathan S.
    Spiegelman, Jessica
    Mourad, Mirella
    Gupta, Simi
    Lam-Rachlin, Jennifer
    Saltzman, Daniel H.
    Rebarber, Andrei
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 216 (01) : S465 - S465