Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:7
|
作者
Nabizadeh, Fardin [1 ,2 ]
Ramezannezhad, Elham [3 ]
Kargar, Amirhosein [4 ]
Sharafi, Amir Mohammad [5 ]
Ghaderi, Ali [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci Educ & Res Network USERN, Neuroscience Res Grp NRG, Tehran, Iran
[2] Iran Univ Med Sci, Sch Med, Tehran, Iran
[3] Isfahan Univ Med Sci, Sch Med, Esfahan, Iran
[4] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Imam Khomeini Hosp Complex IKHC, Tehran, Iran
[5] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Sch Med, Students Sci Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Multiple sclerosis; Artificial intelligence; Diagnosis; Machine learning; NEURAL-NETWORK; MRI;
D O I
10.1007/s10072-022-06460-7
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The expansion of the availability of advanced imaging methods needs more time, expertise, and resources which is in contrast to the primary goal of the imaging techniques. To overcome most of these difficulties, artificial intelligence (AI) can be used. A number of studies used AI models for multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnosis and reported diverse results. Therefore, we aim to perform a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis study on the role of AI in the diagnosis of MS. Methods We performed a systematic search using four databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE. Studies that applied deep learning or AI to the diagnosis of MS based on any modalities were considered eligible in our study. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and area under curve (AUC) were pooled with a random-effects model and 95% confidence interval (CI). Results After the screening, 41 articles with 5989 individuals met the inclusion criteria and were included in our qualitative and quantitative synthesis. Our analysis showed that the overall accuracy among studies was 94% (95%CI: 93%, 96%). The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 92% (95%CI: 90%, 95%) and 93% (95%CI: 90%, 96%), respectively. Furthermore, our analysis showed 92% precision in MS diagnosis for AI studies (95%CI: 88%, 97%). Also, the overall pooled AUC was 93% (95%CI: 89%, 96%). Conclusion Overall, AI models can further improve our diagnostic practice in MS patients. Our results indicate that the use of AI can aid the clinicians in accurate diagnosis of MS and improve current diagnostic approaches as most of the parameters including accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and AUC were considerably high, especially when using MRI data.
引用
收藏
页码:499 / 517
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Fardin Nabizadeh
    Elham Ramezannezhad
    Amirhosein Kargar
    Amir Mohammad Sharafi
    Ali Ghaderi
    Neurological Sciences, 2023, 44 : 499 - 517
  • [2] Diagnostic Performance of Artificial Intelligence in Rib Fracture Detection: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    van den Broek, Marnix C. L.
    Buijs, Jorn H.
    Schmitz, Liselotte F. M.
    Wijffels, Mathieu M. E.
    SURGERIES, 2024, 5 (01): : 24 - 36
  • [3] Artificial intelligence as diagnostic modality for keratoconus: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Afifah, Azzahra
    Syafira, Fara
    Afladhanti, Putri Mahirah
    Dharmawidiarini, Dini
    JOURNAL OF TAIBAH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2024, 19 (02): : 296 - 303
  • [4] Artificial intelligence in antimicrobial stewardship: a systematic review and meta-analysis of predictive performance and diagnostic accuracy
    Pennisi, Flavia
    Pinto, Antonio
    Ricciardi, Giovanni Emanuele
    Signorelli, Carlo
    Gianfredi, Vincenza
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2025, 44 (03) : 463 - 513
  • [5] Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence in detection of renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gouravani, Mahdi
    Farahani, Mohammad Shahrabi
    Salehi, Mohammad Amin
    Shojaei, Shayan
    Mirakhori, Sina
    Harandi, Hamid
    Mohammadi, Soheil
    Saleh, Ramy R.
    BMC CANCER, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [6] Artificial intelligence for screening and diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Umar, Tungki Pratama
    Jain, Nityanand
    Papageorgakopoulou, Manthia
    Shaheen, Rahma Sameh
    Alsamhori, Jehad Feras
    Muzzamil, Muhammad
    Kostiks, Andrejs
    AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS AND FRONTOTEMPORAL DEGENERATION, 2024, 25 (5-6) : 425 - 436
  • [7] Systematic review and meta-analysis of reflexology for people with multiple sclerosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ma, Xiaohong
    Yuan, Zhaoyu
    Qian, Baicheng
    Guan, Yunxiang
    Wang, Baoliang
    MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (05) : E32661
  • [8] The predictive performance of artificial intelligence on the outcome of stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yang, Yujia
    Tang, Li
    Deng, Yiting
    Li, Xuzi
    Luo, Anling
    Zhang, Zhao
    He, Li
    Zhu, Cairong
    Zhou, Muke
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2023, 17
  • [9] The diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence in thoracic diseases: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yang, Yi
    Jin, Gang
    Pang, Yao
    Wang, Wenhao
    Zhang, Hongyi
    Tuo, Guangxin
    Wu, Peng
    Wang, Zequan
    Zhu, Zijiang
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (07)
  • [10] Diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence in detecting retinitis pigmentosa: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Musleh, Ayman Mohammed
    AlRyalat, Saif Aldeen
    Abid, Mohammad Naim
    Salem, Yahia
    Hamila, Haitham Mounir
    Sallam, Ahmed B.
    SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 69 (03) : 411 - 417