Artificial intelligence as diagnostic modality for keratoconus: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives: The challenges in diagnosing keratoconus (KC) have led researchers to explore the use of artificial intelligence (AI) as a diagnostic tool. AI has emerged as a new way to improve the efficiency of KC diagnosis. This study analyzed the use of AI as a diagnostic modality for KC. Methods: This study used a systematic review and metaanalysis following the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched selected databases using a combination of search terms: "((Artificial Intelligence) OR (Diagnostic Modality)) AND (Keratoconus)" from PubMed, Medline, and ScienceDirect within the last 5 years (2018e2023). Following a systematic review protocol, we selected 11 articles and 6 articles were eligible for final analysis. The relevant data were analyzed with Review Manager 5.4 software and the final output was presented in a forest plot. Results: This research found neural networks as the most used AI model in diagnosing KC. Neural networks and nai center dot ve bayes showed the highest accuracy of AI in diagnosing KC with a sensitivity of 1.00, while random forests were >0.90. All studies in each group have proven high sensitivity and specificity over 0.90. Conclusions: AI potentially makes a better diagnosis of the KC with its high performance, particularly on sensitivity and specificity, which can help clinicians make medical decisions about an individual patient.