The predictive performance of artificial intelligence on the outcome of stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:3
|
作者
Yang, Yujia [1 ]
Tang, Li [1 ]
Deng, Yiting [1 ]
Li, Xuzi [1 ]
Luo, Anling [1 ]
Zhang, Zhao [1 ]
He, Li [1 ]
Zhu, Cairong [2 ,3 ]
Zhou, Muke [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Neurol, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Hlth Stat, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp 4, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
artificial intelligence; machine learning; deep learning; acute stroke; outcome; prognosis; prediction; ACUTE ISCHEMIC-STROKE; DEEP; CLASSIFICATION;
D O I
10.3389/fnins.2023.1256592
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
ObjectivesThis study aimed to assess the accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) models in predicting the prognosis of stroke.MethodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases to identify studies using AI for acute stroke prognosis prediction from the database inception to February 2023. Selected studies were designed cohorts and had complete data. We used the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool to assess the qualities and bias of included studies and used a random-effects model to summarize and analyze the data. We used the area under curve (AUC) as an indicator of the predictive accuracy of AI models.ResultsWe retrieved a total of 1,241 publications and finally included seven studies. There was a low risk of bias and no significant heterogeneity in the final seven studies. The total pooled AUC under the fixed-effects model was 0.872 with a 95% CI of (0.862-0.881). The DL subgroup showed its AUC of 0.888 (95%CI 0.872-0.904). The LR subgroup showed its AUC 0.852 (95%CI 0.835-0.869). The RF subgroup showed its AUC 0.863 (95%CI 0.845-0.882). The SVM subgroup showed its AUC 0.905 (95%CI 0.857-0.952). The Xgboost subgroup showed its AUC 0.905 (95%CI 0.805-1.000).ConclusionThe accuracy of AI models in predicting the outcomes of ischemic stroke is good from our study. It could be an assisting tool for physicians in judging the outcomes of stroke patients. With the update of AI algorithms and the use of big data, further AI predictive models will perform better.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Artificial intelligence for MRI stroke detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bojsen, Jonas Asgaard
    Elhakim, Mohammad Talal
    Graumann, Ole
    Gaist, David
    Nielsen, Mads
    Harbo, Frederik Severin Grae
    Krag, Christian Hedeager
    Sagar, Malini Vendela
    Kruuse, Christina
    Boesen, Mikael Ploug
    Rasmussen, Benjamin Schnack Brandt
    [J]. INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING, 2024, 15 (01):
  • [2] Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Nabizadeh, Fardin
    Ramezannezhad, Elham
    Kargar, Amirhosein
    Sharafi, Amir Mohammad
    Ghaderi, Ali
    [J]. NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 44 (02) : 499 - 517
  • [3] Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Fardin Nabizadeh
    Elham Ramezannezhad
    Amirhosein Kargar
    Amir Mohammad Sharafi
    Ali Ghaderi
    [J]. Neurological Sciences, 2023, 44 : 499 - 517
  • [4] Artificial Intelligence for Hip Fracture Detection and Outcome Prediction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Lex, Johnathan R.
    Di Michele, Joseph
    Koucheki, Robert
    Pincus, Daniel
    Whyne, Cari
    Ravi, Bheeshma
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2023, 6 (03) : E233391
  • [5] Artificial Intelligence in Fracture Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Kuo, Rachel Y. L.
    Harrison, Conrad
    Curran, Terry-Ann
    Jones, Benjamin
    Freethy, Alexander
    Cussons, David
    Stewart, Max
    Collins, Gary S.
    Furniss, Dominic
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2022, 304 (01) : 50 - 62
  • [6] Artificial intelligence in osteoarthritis detection: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mohammadi, Soheil
    Salehi, Mohammad Amin
    Jahanshahi, Ali
    Farahani, Mohammad Shahrabi
    Zakavi, Seyed Sina
    Behrouzieh, Sadra
    Gouravani, Mahdi
    Guermazi, Ali
    [J]. OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2024, 32 (03) : 241 - 253
  • [7] Artificial Intelligence in Laryngeal Endoscopy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zurek, Michal
    Jasak, Kamil
    Niemczyk, Kazimierz
    Rzepakowska, Anna
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (10)
  • [8] Performance of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy for adenoma and polyp detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hassan, Cesare
    Spadaccini, Marco
    Iannone, Andrea
    Maselli, Roberta
    Jovani, Manol
    Chandrasekar, Viveksandeep Thoguluva
    Antonelli, Giulio
    Yu, Honggang
    Areia, Miguel
    Dinis-Ribeiro, Mario
    Bhandari, Pradeep
    Sharma, Prateek
    Rex, Douglas K.
    Roesch, Thomas
    Wallace, Michael
    Repici, Alessandro
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2021, 93 (01) : 77 - +
  • [9] Systematic review and meta-analysis of performance of wearable artificial intelligence in detecting and predicting depression
    Alaa Abd-Alrazaq
    Rawan AlSaad
    Farag Shuweihdi
    Arfan Ahmed
    Sarah Aziz
    Javaid Sheikh
    [J]. npj Digital Medicine, 6
  • [10] Diagnostic Performance of Artificial Intelligence in Rib Fracture Detection: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    van den Broek, Marnix C. L.
    Buijs, Jorn H.
    Schmitz, Liselotte F. M.
    Wijffels, Mathieu M. E.
    [J]. SURGERIES, 2024, 5 (01): : 24 - 36