Artificial intelligence for MRI stroke detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Bojsen, Jonas Asgaard [1 ]
Elhakim, Mohammad Talal [1 ]
Graumann, Ole [2 ]
Gaist, David [3 ]
Nielsen, Mads [4 ]
Harbo, Frederik Severin Grae [1 ]
Krag, Christian Hedeager [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Sagar, Malini Vendela [7 ,8 ]
Kruuse, Christina [7 ,9 ]
Boesen, Mikael Ploug [5 ,7 ,10 ]
Rasmussen, Benjamin Schnack Brandt [1 ,11 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Denmark, Odense Univ Hosp, Res & Innovat Unit Radiol, Odense, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ, Aarhus Univ Hosp, Res Unit Radiol, Aarhus, Denmark
[3] Univ Southern Denmark, Odense Univ Hosp, Res Unit Neurol, Odense, Denmark
[4] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Comp Sci, Copenhagen, Denmark
[5] Copenhagen Univ Hosp Bispebjerg, Herlev & Gentofte Hosp, Radiol AI Test Ctr, Copenhagen, Denmark
[6] Copenhagen Univ Hosp Herlev & Gentofte, Dept Radiol, Copenhagen, Denmark
[7] Univ Copenhagen, Inst Clin Med, Copenhagen, Denmark
[8] Copenhagen Univ Hosp Herlev & Gentofte, Dept Neurol, Copenhagen, Denmark
[9] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Dept Neurol, Rigshosp, Copenhagen, Denmark
[10] Copenhagen Univ Hosp Bispebjerg & Frederiksberg, Dept Radiol, Copenhagen, Denmark
[11] Univ Southern Denmark, Odense Univ Hosp, Ctr Clin Artificial Intelligence, Odense, Denmark
来源
INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING | 2024年 / 15卷 / 01期
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Magnetic resonance imaging; Stroke; Systematic review; Meta-analysis; EAST-COAST PERSPECTIVE; ACUTE ISCHEMIC-STROKE; AUTOMATED DETECTION; QUALITY ASSESSMENT; TEXTURE ANALYSIS; ERROR;
D O I
10.1186/s13244-024-01723-7
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the stroke detection performance of artificial intelligence (AI) in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and additionally to identify reporting insufficiencies.Methods PRISMA guidelines were followed. MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central, and IEEE Xplore were searched for studies utilising MRI and AI for stroke detection. The protocol was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021289748). Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were the primary outcomes. Only studies using MRI in adults were included. The intervention was AI for stroke detection with ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke in separate categories. Any manual labelling was used as a comparator. A modified QUADAS-2 tool was used for bias assessment. The minimum information about clinical artificial intelligence modelling (MI-CLAIM) checklist was used to assess reporting insufficiencies. Meta-analyses were performed for sensitivity, specificity, and hierarchical summary ROC (HSROC) on low risk of bias studies.Results Thirty-three studies were eligible for inclusion. Fifteen studies had a low risk of bias. Low-risk studies were better for reporting MI-CLAIM items. Only one study examined a CE-approved AI algorithm. Forest plots revealed detection sensitivity and specificity of 93% and 93% with identical performance in the HSROC analysis and positive and negative likelihood ratios of 12.6 and 0.079.Conclusion Current AI technology can detect ischaemic stroke in MRI. There is a need for further validation of haemorrhagic detection. The clinical usability of AI stroke detection in MRI is yet to be investigated.Critical relevance statement This first meta-analysis concludes that AI, utilising diffusion-weighted MRI sequences, can accurately aid the detection of ischaemic brain lesions and its clinical utility is ready to be uncovered in clinical trials.Key Points There is a growing interest in AI solutions for detection aid. The performance is unknown for MRI stroke assessment. AI detection sensitivity and specificity were 93% and 93% for ischaemic lesions. There is limited evidence for the detection of patients with haemorrhagic lesions. AI can accurately detect patients with ischaemic stroke in MRI.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Artificial Intelligence in Fracture Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Kuo, Rachel Y. L.
    Harrison, Conrad
    Curran, Terry-Ann
    Jones, Benjamin
    Freethy, Alexander
    Cussons, David
    Stewart, Max
    Collins, Gary S.
    Furniss, Dominic
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2022, 304 (01) : 50 - 62
  • [2] Artificial intelligence in osteoarthritis detection: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mohammadi, Soheil
    Salehi, Mohammad Amin
    Jahanshahi, Ali
    Farahani, Mohammad Shahrabi
    Zakavi, Seyed Sina
    Behrouzieh, Sadra
    Gouravani, Mahdi
    Guermazi, Ali
    [J]. OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2024, 32 (03) : 241 - 253
  • [3] The predictive performance of artificial intelligence on the outcome of stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yang, Yujia
    Tang, Li
    Deng, Yiting
    Li, Xuzi
    Luo, Anling
    Zhang, Zhao
    He, Li
    Zhu, Cairong
    Zhou, Muke
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2023, 17
  • [4] Detection of cerebral aneurysms using artificial intelligence: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Din, Munaib
    Agarwal, Siddharth
    Grzeda, Mariusz
    Wood, David A.
    Modat, Marc
    Booth, Thomas C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROINTERVENTIONAL SURGERY, 2023, 15 (03) : 262 - +
  • [5] Artificial intelligence for polyp detection during colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Barua, Ishita
    Vinsard, Daniela Guerrero
    Jodal, Henriette C.
    Loberg, Magnus
    Kalager, Mette
    Holme, Oyvind
    Misawa, Masashi
    Bretthauer, Michael
    Mori, Yuichi
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2021, 53 (03) : 277 - 284
  • [6] Performance of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy for adenoma and polyp detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hassan, Cesare
    Spadaccini, Marco
    Iannone, Andrea
    Maselli, Roberta
    Jovani, Manol
    Chandrasekar, Viveksandeep Thoguluva
    Antonelli, Giulio
    Yu, Honggang
    Areia, Miguel
    Dinis-Ribeiro, Mario
    Bhandari, Pradeep
    Sharma, Prateek
    Rex, Douglas K.
    Roesch, Thomas
    Wallace, Michael
    Repici, Alessandro
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2021, 93 (01) : 77 - +
  • [7] Diagnostic Performance of Artificial Intelligence in Rib Fracture Detection: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    van den Broek, Marnix C. L.
    Buijs, Jorn H.
    Schmitz, Liselotte F. M.
    Wijffels, Mathieu M. E.
    [J]. SURGERIES, 2024, 5 (01): : 24 - 36
  • [8] Utility of Artificial Intelligence in the Cystoscopic Detection of Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ganesananthan, S.
    Ganesananthan, S.
    Simpson, B. S.
    Norris, J. M.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108
  • [9] Artificial Intelligence for Hip Fracture Detection and Outcome Prediction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Lex, Johnathan R.
    Di Michele, Joseph
    Koucheki, Robert
    Pincus, Daniel
    Whyne, Cari
    Ravi, Bheeshma
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2023, 6 (03) : E233391
  • [10] Artificial Intelligence in Laryngeal Endoscopy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zurek, Michal
    Jasak, Kamil
    Niemczyk, Kazimierz
    Rzepakowska, Anna
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (10)