Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:7
|
作者
Nabizadeh, Fardin [1 ,2 ]
Ramezannezhad, Elham [3 ]
Kargar, Amirhosein [4 ]
Sharafi, Amir Mohammad [5 ]
Ghaderi, Ali [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci Educ & Res Network USERN, Neuroscience Res Grp NRG, Tehran, Iran
[2] Iran Univ Med Sci, Sch Med, Tehran, Iran
[3] Isfahan Univ Med Sci, Sch Med, Esfahan, Iran
[4] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Imam Khomeini Hosp Complex IKHC, Tehran, Iran
[5] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Sch Med, Students Sci Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Multiple sclerosis; Artificial intelligence; Diagnosis; Machine learning; NEURAL-NETWORK; MRI;
D O I
10.1007/s10072-022-06460-7
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The expansion of the availability of advanced imaging methods needs more time, expertise, and resources which is in contrast to the primary goal of the imaging techniques. To overcome most of these difficulties, artificial intelligence (AI) can be used. A number of studies used AI models for multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnosis and reported diverse results. Therefore, we aim to perform a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis study on the role of AI in the diagnosis of MS. Methods We performed a systematic search using four databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE. Studies that applied deep learning or AI to the diagnosis of MS based on any modalities were considered eligible in our study. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and area under curve (AUC) were pooled with a random-effects model and 95% confidence interval (CI). Results After the screening, 41 articles with 5989 individuals met the inclusion criteria and were included in our qualitative and quantitative synthesis. Our analysis showed that the overall accuracy among studies was 94% (95%CI: 93%, 96%). The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 92% (95%CI: 90%, 95%) and 93% (95%CI: 90%, 96%), respectively. Furthermore, our analysis showed 92% precision in MS diagnosis for AI studies (95%CI: 88%, 97%). Also, the overall pooled AUC was 93% (95%CI: 89%, 96%). Conclusion Overall, AI models can further improve our diagnostic practice in MS patients. Our results indicate that the use of AI can aid the clinicians in accurate diagnosis of MS and improve current diagnostic approaches as most of the parameters including accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and AUC were considerably high, especially when using MRI data.
引用
收藏
页码:499 / 517
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence-assisted PET imaging for Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jing Wang
    Le Xue
    Jiehui Jiang
    Fengtao Liu
    Ping Wu
    Jiaying Lu
    Huiwei Zhang
    Weiqi Bao
    Qian Xu
    Zizhao Ju
    Li Chen
    Fangyang Jiao
    Huamei Lin
    Jingjie Ge
    Chuantao Zuo
    Mei Tian
    npj Digital Medicine, 7
  • [32] Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: A systematic review
    Nabizadeh, Fardin
    Masrouri, Soroush
    Ramezannezhad, Elham
    Ghaderi, Ali
    Sharafi, Amir Mohammad
    Soraneh, Soroush
    Moghadasi, Abdorreza Naser
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS AND RELATED DISORDERS, 2022, 59
  • [33] Diagnostic Performance of Artificial Intelligence in Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-analysis
    Salehi, Mohammad Amin
    Harandi, Hamid
    Mohammadi, Soheil
    Farahani, Mohammad Shahrabi
    Shojaei, Shayan
    Saleh, Ramy R.
    JOURNAL OF IMAGING INFORMATICS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 37 (04): : 1297 - 1311
  • [34] Toxoplasma gondii and multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cicero, Calogero Edoardo
    Allibrio, Francesca Elsa
    Giuliano, Loretta
    Luna, Jaime
    Preux, Pierre-Marie
    Nicoletti, Alessandra
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2021, 28 (12) : 4251 - 4257
  • [35] Association of multiple sclerosis with vitiligo: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shen, Meng-Han
    Ng, Chau Yee
    Chang, Kuo-Hsuan
    Chi, Ching-Chi
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [36] Immunizations and risk of multiple sclerosis: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Farez, Mauricio F.
    Correale, Jorge
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2011, 258 (07) : 1197 - 1206
  • [37] Immunizations and risk of multiple sclerosis: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mauricio F. Farez
    Jorge Correale
    Journal of Neurology, 2011, 258 : 1197 - 1206
  • [38] Prevalence of dysphagia in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xiao-Li Guan
    Hui Wang
    Hai-Shan Huang
    Ling Meng
    Neurological Sciences, 2015, 36 : 671 - 681
  • [39] Misdiagnosis and underdiagnosis of multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zuerrer, Wolfgang Emanuel
    Cannon, Amelia Elaine
    Ilchenko, Dariya
    Gaitan, Maria Ines
    Granberg, Tobias
    Piehl, Fredrik
    Solomon, Andrew J.
    Ineichen, Benjamin Victor
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2024, 30 (11-12) : 1409 - 1422
  • [40] Vascular function in multiple sclerosis: Systematic review with meta-analysis
    Zheng, Peixuan
    DuBose, Noah G.
    DeJonge, Sydney R.
    Jeng, Brenda
    Hibner, Brooks A.
    Motl, Robert W.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS AND RELATED DISORDERS, 2024, 91