Screening macroalgae for mitigation of enteric methane in vitro

被引:6
|
作者
Wasson, D. E. [1 ]
Stefenoni, H. [1 ]
Cueva, S. F. [1 ]
Lage, C. [1 ]
Raisanen, S. E. [1 ,2 ]
Melgar, A. [1 ,3 ]
Fetter, M. [1 ]
Hennessy, M. [4 ]
Narayan, K. [4 ]
Indugu, N. [4 ]
Pitta, D. [4 ]
Yarish, C. [5 ]
Hristov, A. N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Agr Sci, Dept Environm Sci, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Agr Innovat Inst Panama IDIAP, 161 Carlos Lara St, City Knowledge 07144, Panama
[4] Univ Penn, New Bolton Ctr, Sch Vet Med, Dept Clin Studies, Kennett Sq, PA 19348 USA
[5] Univ Connecticut, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Stamford, CT 06901 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
ASPARAGOPSIS-TAXIFORMIS; RUMEN METHANOGENESIS; FERMENTATION; BACTERIAL; IDENTIFICATION; POPULATIONS; INHIBITION; SEQUENCES; EMISSION; SEAWEED;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-023-36359-y
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
This study investigated the effects of 67 species of macroalgae on methanogenesis and rumen fermentation in vitro. Specimens were analyzed for their effect on ruminal fermentation and microbial community profiles. Incubations were carried out in an automated gas production system for 24-h and macroalgae were tested at 2% (feed dry matter basis) inclusion rate. Methane yield was decreased 99% by Asparagopsis taxiformis (AT) when compared with the control. Colpomenia peregrina also decreased methane yield 14% compared with control; no other species influenced methane yield. Total gas production was decreased 14 and 10% by AT and Sargassum horneri compared with control, respectively. Total volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentration was decreased between 5 and 8% by 3 macroalgae, whereas AT reduced it by 10%. Molar proportion of acetate was decreased 9% by AT, along with an increase in propionate by 14%. Asparagopsis taxiformis also increased butyrate and valerate molar proportions by 7 and 24%, respectively, whereas 3 macroalgae species decreased molar proportion of butyrate 3 to 5%. Vertebrata lanosa increased ammonia concentration, whereas 3 other species decreased it. Inclusion of AT decreased relative abundance of Prevotella, Bacteroidales, Firmicutes and Methanobacteriaceae, whereas Clostridium, Anaerovibrio and Methanobrevibacter were increased. Specific gene activities for Methanosphaera stadtmane and Methanobrevibacter ruminantium were decreased by AT inclusion. In this in vitro study, Asparagopsis taxiformis was most effective in decreasing methane concentration and yield, but also decreased total gas production and VFA concentration which indicates overall inhibition of ruminal fermentation. No other macroalgae were identified as potential mitigants of enteric methane.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Current Perspectives on Achieving Pronounced Enteric Methane Mitigation From Ruminant Production
    Ungerfeld, Emilio M.
    Beauchemin, Karen A.
    Munoz, Camila
    FRONTIERS IN ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2022, 2
  • [42] Reducing the carbon footprint of Australian milk production by mitigation of enteric methane emissions
    Moate, Peter J.
    Deighton, Matthew H.
    Williams, S. Richard O.
    Pryce, Jennie E.
    Hayes, Ben J.
    Jacobs, Joe L.
    Eckard, Richard J.
    Hannah, Murray C.
    Wales, William J.
    ANIMAL PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2016, 56 (07) : 1017 - 1034
  • [43] Mitigation strategies for enteric methane emission with special emphasis on biological approaches: A review
    Malik, P. K.
    Singhal, K. K.
    Deshpande, S. B.
    Siddique, R. A.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2012, 82 (08): : 794 - 804
  • [44] Mitigation of enteric methane for French cattle: potential extent and cost of selected actions
    Doreau, M.
    Bamiere, L.
    Pellerin, S.
    Lherm, M.
    Benoit, M.
    ANIMAL PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2014, 54 (09) : 1417 - 1422
  • [45] A Review of 3-Nitrooxypropanol for Enteric Methane Mitigation from Ruminant Livestock
    Yu, Guanghui
    Beauchemin, Karen A.
    Dong, Ruilan
    ANIMALS, 2021, 11 (12):
  • [46] Development and evaluation of an in vitro procedure to assess enteric methane production
    Dela Pierre, Flavia
    Friuli, Martina
    Rolle, Luca
    Fortina, Riccardo
    Tassone, Sonia
    Dinuccio, Elio
    2022 IEEE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON METROLOGY FOR AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY (METROAGRIFOR), 2022, : 33 - 37
  • [47] In Vitro Evaluation of Different Dietary Methane Mitigation Strategies
    Chagas, Juana C.
    Ramin, Mohammad
    Krizsan, Sophie J.
    ANIMALS, 2019, 9 (12):
  • [48] SPECIAL TOPICS-Mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from animal operations: I. A review of enteric methane mitigation options
    Hristov, A. N.
    Oh, J.
    Firkins, J. L.
    Dijkstra, J.
    Kebreab, E.
    Waghorn, G.
    Makkar, H. P. S.
    Adesogan, A. T.
    Yang, W.
    Lee, C.
    Gerber, P. J.
    Henderson, B.
    Tricarico, J. M.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2013, 91 (11) : 5045 - 5069
  • [49] Effects of dietary inclusion of 3 Nordic brown macroalgae on enteric methane emission and productivity of dairy cows
    Thorsteinsson, M.
    Weisbjerg, M. R.
    Lund, P.
    Bruhn, A.
    Hellwing, A. L. F.
    Nielsen, M. O.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2023, 106 (10) : 6921 - 6937
  • [50] Feed additives for methane mitigation: Recommendations for testing enteric methane-mitigating feed additives in ruminant studies
    Hristov, Alexander N.
    Bannink, Andre
    Battelli, Marco
    Belanche, Alejandro
    Sanz, M. Cecilia Cajarville
    Fernandez-Turren, Gonzalo
    Garcia, Florencia
    Jonker, Arjan
    Kenny, David A.
    Lind, Vibeke
    Meale, Sarah J.
    Zilio, David Meo
    Munoz, Camila
    Pacheco, David
    Peiren, Nico
    Ramin, Mohammad
    Rapetti, Luca
    Schwarm, Angela
    Stergiadis, Sokratis
    Theodoridou, Katerina
    Ungerfeld, Emilio M.
    van Gastelen, Sanne
    Yanez-Ruiz, David R.
    Waters, Sinead M.
    Lund, Peter
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2025, 108 (01) : 322 - 355