Screening macroalgae for mitigation of enteric methane in vitro

被引:6
|
作者
Wasson, D. E. [1 ]
Stefenoni, H. [1 ]
Cueva, S. F. [1 ]
Lage, C. [1 ]
Raisanen, S. E. [1 ,2 ]
Melgar, A. [1 ,3 ]
Fetter, M. [1 ]
Hennessy, M. [4 ]
Narayan, K. [4 ]
Indugu, N. [4 ]
Pitta, D. [4 ]
Yarish, C. [5 ]
Hristov, A. N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Agr Sci, Dept Environm Sci, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Agr Innovat Inst Panama IDIAP, 161 Carlos Lara St, City Knowledge 07144, Panama
[4] Univ Penn, New Bolton Ctr, Sch Vet Med, Dept Clin Studies, Kennett Sq, PA 19348 USA
[5] Univ Connecticut, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Stamford, CT 06901 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
ASPARAGOPSIS-TAXIFORMIS; RUMEN METHANOGENESIS; FERMENTATION; BACTERIAL; IDENTIFICATION; POPULATIONS; INHIBITION; SEQUENCES; EMISSION; SEAWEED;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-023-36359-y
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
This study investigated the effects of 67 species of macroalgae on methanogenesis and rumen fermentation in vitro. Specimens were analyzed for their effect on ruminal fermentation and microbial community profiles. Incubations were carried out in an automated gas production system for 24-h and macroalgae were tested at 2% (feed dry matter basis) inclusion rate. Methane yield was decreased 99% by Asparagopsis taxiformis (AT) when compared with the control. Colpomenia peregrina also decreased methane yield 14% compared with control; no other species influenced methane yield. Total gas production was decreased 14 and 10% by AT and Sargassum horneri compared with control, respectively. Total volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentration was decreased between 5 and 8% by 3 macroalgae, whereas AT reduced it by 10%. Molar proportion of acetate was decreased 9% by AT, along with an increase in propionate by 14%. Asparagopsis taxiformis also increased butyrate and valerate molar proportions by 7 and 24%, respectively, whereas 3 macroalgae species decreased molar proportion of butyrate 3 to 5%. Vertebrata lanosa increased ammonia concentration, whereas 3 other species decreased it. Inclusion of AT decreased relative abundance of Prevotella, Bacteroidales, Firmicutes and Methanobacteriaceae, whereas Clostridium, Anaerovibrio and Methanobrevibacter were increased. Specific gene activities for Methanosphaera stadtmane and Methanobrevibacter ruminantium were decreased by AT inclusion. In this in vitro study, Asparagopsis taxiformis was most effective in decreasing methane concentration and yield, but also decreased total gas production and VFA concentration which indicates overall inhibition of ruminal fermentation. No other macroalgae were identified as potential mitigants of enteric methane.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Mode of action of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in enteric methane mitigation in pigs
    Gong, Y. L.
    Liang, J. B.
    Jahromi, M. F.
    Wu, Y. B.
    Wright, A. G.
    Liao, X. D.
    ANIMAL, 2018, 12 (02) : 239 - 245
  • [22] Design, implementation and interpretation of in vitro batch culture experiments to assess enteric methane mitigation in ruminants-a review
    Yanez-Ruiz, D. R.
    Bannink, A.
    Dijkstra, J.
    Kebreab, E.
    Morgavi, D. P.
    O'Kiely, P.
    Reynolds, C. K.
    Schwarm, A.
    Shingfield, K. J.
    Yu, Z.
    Hristov, A. N.
    ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 216 : 1 - 18
  • [23] In vitro screening of Algerian steppe browse plants for digestibility, rumen fermentation profile and methane mitigation
    Bouazza, Lyas
    Boufennara, Souhil
    Bensaada, Mustapha
    Zeraib, Azzeddine
    Rahal, Khalid
    Saro, Cristina
    Ranilla, Maria Jose
    Lopez, Secundino
    AGROFORESTRY SYSTEMS, 2020, 94 (04) : 1433 - 1443
  • [24] Dietary mitigation of enteric methane emissions from ruminants: A review of plant tannin mitigation options
    Min, Byeng R.
    Solaiman, Sandra
    Waldrip, Heidi M.
    Parker, David
    Todd, Richard W.
    Brauer, David
    ANIMAL NUTRITION, 2020, 6 (03): : 231 - 246
  • [25] In vitro screening of Algerian steppe browse plants for digestibility, rumen fermentation profile and methane mitigation
    Lyas Bouazza
    Souhil Boufennara
    Mustapha Bensaada
    Azzeddine Zeraib
    Khalid Rahal
    Cristina Saro
    María José Ranilla
    Secundino López
    Agroforestry Systems, 2020, 94 : 1433 - 1443
  • [26] Dietary mitigation of enteric methane emissions from ruminants:A review of plant tannin mitigation options
    Byeng RMin
    Sandra Solaiman
    Heidi MWaldrip
    David Parker
    Richard WTodd
    David Brauer
    Animal Nutrition, 2020, 6 (03) : 231 - 246
  • [27] Dietary mitigation of enteric methane emissions from ruminants:A review of plant tannin mitigation options
    Byeng R.Min
    Sandra Solaiman
    Heidi M.Waldrip
    David Parker
    Richard W.Todd
    David Brauer
    Animal Nutrition , 2020, (03) : 231 - 246
  • [28] The role of rumen microbiota in enteric methane mitigation for sustainable ruminant production
    Shinkai, Takumi
    Takizawa, Shuhei
    Fujimori, Miho
    Mitsumori, Makoto
    ANIMAL BIOSCIENCE, 2024, 37 (02) : 360 - 369
  • [29] Review: Strategies for enteric methane mitigation in cattle fed tropical forages
    Ku-Vera, J. C.
    Castelan-Ortega, O. A.
    Galindo-Maldonado, F. A.
    Arango, J.
    Chirinda, N.
    Jimenez-Ocampo, R.
    Valencia-Salazar, S. S.
    Flores-Santiago, E. J.
    Montoya-Flores, M. D.
    Molina-Botero, I. C.
    Pineiro-Vazquez, A. T.
    Arceo-Castillo, J. I.
    Aguilar-Perez, C. F.
    Ramirez-Aviles, L.
    Solorio-Sanchez, F. J.
    ANIMAL, 2020, 14 : S453 - S463
  • [30] Climate Change and Goat Production: Enteric Methane Emission and Its Mitigation
    Pragna, Pratap
    Chauhan, Surinder S.
    Sejian, Veerasamy
    Leury, Brian J.
    Dunshea, Frank R.
    ANIMALS, 2018, 8 (12):