Monolithic hybrid abutment crowns (screw-retained) versus monolithic hybrid abutments with adhesively cemented monolithic crowns

被引:9
|
作者
Naumann, Michael [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,7 ,8 ,9 ,10 ]
Scholz, Patricia [5 ]
Krois, Joachim [2 ,3 ,6 ]
Schwendicke, Falk [2 ,3 ,6 ]
Sterzenbach, Guido [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Happe, Arndt [5 ]
机构
[1] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Dept Prosthodont Geriatr Dent & Craniomandibular D, Berlin, Germany
[2] Free Univ Berlin, Berlin, Germany
[3] Humboldt Univ, Berlin, Germany
[4] Berlin Inst Hlth, Berlin, Germany
[5] Univ Hosp Ulm, Ctr Dent Oral & Maxillofacial Med, Clin Dent Prosthet, Ulm, Germany
[6] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Dept Oral Diagnost, Digital Hlth & Hlth Serv Res, Berlin, Germany
[7] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Dept Prosthodont Geriatr Dent & Craniomandibular D, Assmannshauser Str 4-6, D-14197 Berlin, Germany
[8] Free Univ Berlin, Assmannshauser Str 4-6, D-14197 Berlin, Germany
[9] Humboldt Univ, Assmannshauser Str 4-6, D-14197 Berlin, Germany
[10] Berlin Inst Hlth, Assmannshauser Str 4-6, D-14197 Berlin, Germany
关键词
clinical trial; implant-borne restoration; monolithic lithium disilicate; randomized controlled trial; titanium base; PERI-IMPLANT DISEASE; EXCESS CEMENT; HEALTH; RISK;
D O I
10.1111/clr.14031
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
ObjectivesThe objective of this study is to compare monolithic hybrid abutment crowns (screw-retained) versus monolithic hybrid abutments with adhesively cemented monolithic single-tooth crowns. Materials and MethodsTwenty subjects in need of an implant-borne restoration were randomly assigned to receive either a cement-retained (CRR) or a screw-retained (SRR) implant-supported monolithic lithium disilicate (LS2) reconstruction. Each patient received a titanium implant with in internal conic connection. After osseointegration and second-stage surgery, healing abutments were placed for about 10 days. The type of restoration (CRR vs. SRR) was randomly assigned, and the restorations were manufactured of monolithic LS2. Both types of restorations, CRR and SRR, were based on a titanium component (Ti-base) that was bonded to the abutment (CRR) or the crown (SRR). The follow-up period for all restoration was 36 months. Clinical outcome was evaluated according to Functional Implant Prosthetic Score (FIPS). Quality of live (OHIP) and patient's satisfaction were assessed using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Primary endpoint was loss of restoration for any reason. Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed and log-rank testing was performed (p < .05). ResultsOne restoration of group CRR failed after 6 months due to loss of adhesion between Ti-base and individual abutment. No further biological or technical failures occurred. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no significant difference between both treatment options (p = .317). There was no statistically significant difference between both types of restoration, neither for FIPS, OHIP, treatment time nor patient satisfaction (p > .05). ConclusionMonolithic hybrid abutment crowns (screw-retained) and monolithic hybrid abutment with adhesively cemented monolithic crowns using lithium disilicate showed no statistically significant difference for implant-based reconstructions in this pilot RCT setting.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 220
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Load-bearing capacity of screw-retained fixed dental prostheses made of monolithic zirconia on different abutment designs and abutment-free implant connection
    Schafer, Tobias
    Matzener, Kiren
    Jung, Ronald E.
    Ozcan, Mutlu
    Hjerppe, Jenni
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2025, 153
  • [42] Effect of abutment finish lines on the mechanical behavior and marginal fit of screw-retained implant crowns: An in vitro study
    Garcia-Gonzalez, Marta
    Gonzalez-Gonzalez, Ignacio
    Garcia-Garcia, Ismael
    Blason-Gonzalez, Sergio
    Lamela-Rey, Maria Jesus
    Fernandez-Canteli, Alfonso
    Alvarez-Arenal, Angel
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2022, 127 (02): : 318.e1 - 318.e10
  • [43] Influence of CAD/CAM Manufacturing Technique and Implant Abutment Angulation on Loosening of Individual Screw-Retained Implant Crowns
    Rico-Coderch, Aitana
    Felix, Luis F.
    Sola-Ruiz, Maria Fernanda
    Medina, Michell
    Agustin-Panadero, Ruben
    Ortega, Rocio
    Cascos, Rocio
    Gomez-Polo, Miguel
    METALS, 2024, 14 (07)
  • [44] Cemented versus screw-retained implant-supported single-tooth crowns: a 10-year randomised controlled trial
    Vigolo, Paolo
    Mutinelli, Sabrina
    Givani, Andrea
    Stellini, Edoardo
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2012, 5 (04) : 355 - 364
  • [45] Marginal fit of cemented and screw-retained crowns incorporated on the Straumann (ITI)® Dental Implant System: an in vitro study
    Tosches, N. A.
    Braegger, U.
    Lang, N. P.
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2009, 20 (01) : 79 - 86
  • [46] Evaluation of Soft Tissues Around Single Tooth Implants in the Anterior Maxilla Restored With Cemented and Screw-Retained Crowns
    Cutrim, Emerson Souza
    Peruzzo, Daiane Cristina
    Benatti, Bruno
    JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2012, 38 (06) : 700 - 705
  • [47] Cemented versus screw-retained posterior implant-supported single crowns: A 24-month randomized controlled clinical trial
    Wolfart, Stefan
    Rittich, Anne
    Gross, Karin
    Hartkamp, Oliver
    von der Stueck, Annabelle
    Raith, Stefan
    Reich, Sven
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2021, 32 (12) : 1484 - 1495
  • [48] Cemented versus screw-retained implant-supported single-tooth crowns: a 4-year prospective clinical study
    Vigolo, P
    Givani, A
    Majzoub, Z
    Cordioli, G
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2004, 19 (02) : 260 - 265
  • [49] Early histological, microbiological, radiological, and clinical response to cemented and screw-retained all-ceramic single crowns
    Thoma, Daniel S.
    Wolleb, Karin
    Bienz, Stefan P.
    Wiedemeier, Daniel
    Hammerle, Christoph H. F.
    Sailer, Irena
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2018, 29 (10) : 996 - 1006
  • [50] Lifetime prediction of veneered versus monolithic lithium disilicate crowns loaded on marginal ridges
    de Paula, Vitor Guarconi
    Bonfante, Gerson
    Lorenzoni, Fabio C.
    Coelho, Paulo G.
    Bonjardim, Leonardo Rigoldi
    Fardin, Vinicius P.
    Bonfante, Estevam A.
    DENTAL MATERIALS, 2019, 35 (03) : 511 - 522