Monolithic hybrid abutment crowns (screw-retained) versus monolithic hybrid abutments with adhesively cemented monolithic crowns

被引:9
|
作者
Naumann, Michael [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,7 ,8 ,9 ,10 ]
Scholz, Patricia [5 ]
Krois, Joachim [2 ,3 ,6 ]
Schwendicke, Falk [2 ,3 ,6 ]
Sterzenbach, Guido [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Happe, Arndt [5 ]
机构
[1] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Dept Prosthodont Geriatr Dent & Craniomandibular D, Berlin, Germany
[2] Free Univ Berlin, Berlin, Germany
[3] Humboldt Univ, Berlin, Germany
[4] Berlin Inst Hlth, Berlin, Germany
[5] Univ Hosp Ulm, Ctr Dent Oral & Maxillofacial Med, Clin Dent Prosthet, Ulm, Germany
[6] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Dept Oral Diagnost, Digital Hlth & Hlth Serv Res, Berlin, Germany
[7] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Dept Prosthodont Geriatr Dent & Craniomandibular D, Assmannshauser Str 4-6, D-14197 Berlin, Germany
[8] Free Univ Berlin, Assmannshauser Str 4-6, D-14197 Berlin, Germany
[9] Humboldt Univ, Assmannshauser Str 4-6, D-14197 Berlin, Germany
[10] Berlin Inst Hlth, Assmannshauser Str 4-6, D-14197 Berlin, Germany
关键词
clinical trial; implant-borne restoration; monolithic lithium disilicate; randomized controlled trial; titanium base; PERI-IMPLANT DISEASE; EXCESS CEMENT; HEALTH; RISK;
D O I
10.1111/clr.14031
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
ObjectivesThe objective of this study is to compare monolithic hybrid abutment crowns (screw-retained) versus monolithic hybrid abutments with adhesively cemented monolithic single-tooth crowns. Materials and MethodsTwenty subjects in need of an implant-borne restoration were randomly assigned to receive either a cement-retained (CRR) or a screw-retained (SRR) implant-supported monolithic lithium disilicate (LS2) reconstruction. Each patient received a titanium implant with in internal conic connection. After osseointegration and second-stage surgery, healing abutments were placed for about 10 days. The type of restoration (CRR vs. SRR) was randomly assigned, and the restorations were manufactured of monolithic LS2. Both types of restorations, CRR and SRR, were based on a titanium component (Ti-base) that was bonded to the abutment (CRR) or the crown (SRR). The follow-up period for all restoration was 36 months. Clinical outcome was evaluated according to Functional Implant Prosthetic Score (FIPS). Quality of live (OHIP) and patient's satisfaction were assessed using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Primary endpoint was loss of restoration for any reason. Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed and log-rank testing was performed (p < .05). ResultsOne restoration of group CRR failed after 6 months due to loss of adhesion between Ti-base and individual abutment. No further biological or technical failures occurred. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no significant difference between both treatment options (p = .317). There was no statistically significant difference between both types of restoration, neither for FIPS, OHIP, treatment time nor patient satisfaction (p > .05). ConclusionMonolithic hybrid abutment crowns (screw-retained) and monolithic hybrid abutment with adhesively cemented monolithic crowns using lithium disilicate showed no statistically significant difference for implant-based reconstructions in this pilot RCT setting.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 220
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Fracture Resistance of Crowns Cemented on Titanium and Zirconia Implant Abutments: A Comparison of Monolithic Versus Manually Veneered All-Ceramic Systems
    Martinez-Rus, Francisco
    Ferreiroa, Alberto
    Oezcan, Mutlu
    Bartolome, Jose F.
    Pradies, Guillermo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2012, 27 (06) : 1448 - 1455
  • [22] Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Cemented Versus Screw-Retained Single Crowns on Customized Zirconia Abutments: 3-Year Results
    Heierle, Linda
    Wolleb, Karin
    Haemmerle, Christoph H. F.
    Wiedemeier, Daniel B.
    Sailer, Irena
    Thoma, Daniel S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2019, 32 (02) : 174 - 176
  • [23] Retention Forces of Monolithic CAD/CAM Crowns Adhesively Cemented to Titanium Base Abutments-Effect of Saliva Contamination Followed by Cleaning of the Titanium Bond Surface
    Burkhardt, Felix
    Pitta, Joao
    Fehmer, Vincent
    Mojon, Philippe
    Sailer, Irena
    MATERIALS, 2021, 14 (12)
  • [24] Fracture Strength and Precision of Fit of Implant-Retained Monolithic Zirconia Crowns
    Moilanen, Pauliina
    Hjerppe, Jenni
    Lassila, Lippo V. J.
    Narhi, Timo O.
    JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2018, 44 (05) : 330 - 334
  • [25] Fracture Load of Monolithic CAD/CAM Ceramic Crowns Placed on Different Implant Abutments
    Meneghetti, Priscila Ceolin
    Pittas do Canto, Paulo Eduardo
    Spohr, Ana Maria
    Burnett Junior, Luiz Henrique
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2022, 37 (06) : 1217 - 1222
  • [26] Influence of straight versus angulated screw channel titanium bases on failure loads of two-piece ceramic and titanium implants restored with screw-retained monolithic crowns: An in-vitro study
    Helal, E.
    Gierthmuehlen, P. C.
    Bonfante, E. A.
    Campos, T. M. B.
    Prott, L. S.
    Langner, R.
    Spitznagel, F. A.
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2023, 34 (11) : 1217 - 1229
  • [27] Mechanical behavior of posterior all-ceramic hybrid-abutment-crowns versus hybrid-abutments with separate crowns-A laboratory study
    Nouh, Ingy
    Kern, Matthias
    Sabet, Ahmed E.
    Aboelfadl, Ahmad K.
    Hamdy, Amina M.
    Chaar, Mohamed S.
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2019, 30 (01) : 90 - 98
  • [28] Fracture Resistance of Monolithic Zirconia Crowns on Four Occlusal Convergent Abutments in Implant Prosthesis
    Lan, Ting-Hsun
    Pan, Chin-Yun
    Liu, Pao-Hsin
    Chou, Mitch M. C.
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2019, 9 (13):
  • [29] Fatigue performance of adhesively luted glass or polycrystalline CAD-CAM monolithic crowns
    Alves, Daniela Meira
    Cadore-Rodrigues, Ana Carolina
    Prochnow, Catina
    de Lima Burgo, Thiago Augusto
    Spazzin, Aloisio Oro
    Bacchi, Atais
    Valandro, Luiz Felipe
    Rocha Pereira, Gabriel Kalil
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2021, 126 (01): : 119 - 127
  • [30] Evaluation of debonding force of screw-retained lithium disilicate implant-supported crowns cemented to abutments of different designs and surface treatments
    Khalifa, Ahmed Abdel Latif
    Metwally, Nayrouz Adel
    Khamis, Mohamed Moataz
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2025, 133 (01): : 215 - 220