Investigation of concentrating solar-biomass-fired power technologies based on advanced exergy, exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses

被引:1
|
作者
Biboum, Alain [1 ]
Yilanci, Ahmet [2 ,5 ]
Thierry, Sosso Mayi Olivier [3 ]
Yimen, Nasser [1 ]
Mouangue, Ruben [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Yaounde, Natl Adv Sch Engn, Mech & Ind Engn Dept, Yaounde, Cameroon
[2] Ege Univ, Solar Energy Inst, Energy Dept, Izmir, Turkiye
[3] Univ Douala, Adv Teachers Training Coll Tech Educ Douala, Lab Thermal & Environm, Douala, Cameroon
[4] Univ Douala, Polytech Higher Natl Sch, E3M Lab, Douala, Cameroon
[5] Ege Univ, Solar Energy Inst, Energy Dept, TR-35100 Izmir, Turkiye
关键词
Hybrid system; concentrating solar power; biomass; exergoeconomic; exergoenvironmental; power generation; SYSTEM; ENERGY; PLANT;
D O I
10.1080/15567036.2023.2239747
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
In this study, hybrid renewable power systems (HRPS) based on biomass-fired (BF) and concentrating solar power (CSP) technologies are investigated. Parabolic trough collector (PTC), linear Fresnel reflector (LFR) and solar tower (ST) as CSP technologies are considered. This study aims to determine and compare exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental factors, as well as and the relative cost and environmental impact differences of three proposed HRPS options for the district of Faro in the province of Garoua, Cameroon. Also, advanced exergy destruction expressions are used. We found the optimized exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental factors for the subsystems of HRPS to be between 0.04-0.98 and 0.05-0.98, respectively. They have the highest values for the drying system (DS), and the lowest values for the solar-biomass field (SF+BF). The relative cost and environmental impact differences for the subsystems of HRPS are in the ranges of 0.07-0.79 and 0.28-0.96, respectively. They have the highest values for the DS, and the lowest values for the power block (PB). According to the levelized exergoeconomic/exergoenvironmental performances, PTC - BF presents the worst results before the optimization. ST - BF shows the best exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental performance in the optimization process. The results of the sensitivity and optimization analyses reveal that it is essential to conduct eco-indicator and advanced exergy analyses to avoid high environmental impact points and specific exergy destructions.
引用
收藏
页码:9668 / 9683
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Advanced exergy and advanced exergoeconomic analyses of the partial heating supercritical CO2 power cycle for waste heat recovery
    Zendehnam, Arman
    Pourfayaz, Fathollah
    JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY, 2024, 149 (08) : 3397 - 3414
  • [42] Advanced exergy and exergoeconomic analyses to evaluate the economy of LNG oxy-fuel combined cycle power plant
    Cai, Lei
    Fu, Yidan
    Cheng, Zeyang
    Xiang, Yanlei
    Guan, Yanwen
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 10 (05):
  • [43] Design and energy, exergy, and exergoeconomic analyses of a novel biomass-based green hydrogen and power generation system integrated with carbon capture and power-to-gas
    Kermani, Amirmohammad Arjomand
    Houshfar, Ehsan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2024, 52 : 177 - 189
  • [44] Optimum integration of concentrating solar technologies in a real coal-fired power plant for fuel saving
    Rech, Sergio
    Lazzaretto, Andrea
    Grigolon, Enrico
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 178 : 299 - 310
  • [45] Thermodynamic and exergoeconomic analyses of a novel biomass-fired combined cycle with solar energy and hydrogen and freshwater production in sports arenas
    Laleh, Shayan Sharafi
    Safarpour, Ali
    Shahrak, Arash Shahbazi
    Alavi, Seyed Hamed Fatemi
    Soltani, Saeed
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2024, 59 : 1507 - 1517
  • [46] Energy, exergy, exergoeconomic, and exergoenvironmental analysis of an innovative solar-geothermal-gas driven polygeneration system for combined power, hydrogen, hot water, and freshwater production
    Manesh, M. H. Khoshgoftar
    Rabeti, S. A. Mousavi
    Nourpour, M.
    Said, Z.
    SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS, 2022, 51
  • [47] Towards on energy-saving separation of ethylene glycol mixture from production plants based on energy, exergy, economic, environmental, exergoeconomic, and exergoenvironmental analyses
    Wang, Lili
    Niu, Baowei
    Xia, Li
    Zhao, Wenying
    Sun, Xiaoyan
    Xiang, Shuguang
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 377
  • [48] Modified auxiliary exergy costing in advanced exergoeconomic analysis applied to a hybrid solar-biomass organic Rankine cycle plant
    Oyekale, Joseph
    Petrollese, Mario
    Cau, Giorgio
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2020, 268
  • [49] Energy, exergy, exergoeconomic, and environmental analyses and multi-objective optimization of a biomass-to-energy integrated thermal power plant
    He, Fan
    Liu, Xiaoyu
    Wang, Meitao
    Zhou, Shuang
    Heydarian, Dariush
    ALEXANDRIA ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2022, 61 (07) : 5629 - 5648
  • [50] Energy, exergy, exergoeconomic, exergoenvironmental, and transient analysis of a gas-fired power plant-driven proposed system with combined Rankine cycle: thermoelectric for power production under different weather conditions
    Assareh, Ehsanolah
    Hoseinzadeh, Siamak
    Ghersi, Djamal Eddine
    Farhadi, Ehsan
    Keykhah, Sajjad
    Lee, Moonyong
    JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY, 2023, 148 (16) : 8283 - 8307