Investigation of concentrating solar-biomass-fired power technologies based on advanced exergy, exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses

被引:1
|
作者
Biboum, Alain [1 ]
Yilanci, Ahmet [2 ,5 ]
Thierry, Sosso Mayi Olivier [3 ]
Yimen, Nasser [1 ]
Mouangue, Ruben [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Yaounde, Natl Adv Sch Engn, Mech & Ind Engn Dept, Yaounde, Cameroon
[2] Ege Univ, Solar Energy Inst, Energy Dept, Izmir, Turkiye
[3] Univ Douala, Adv Teachers Training Coll Tech Educ Douala, Lab Thermal & Environm, Douala, Cameroon
[4] Univ Douala, Polytech Higher Natl Sch, E3M Lab, Douala, Cameroon
[5] Ege Univ, Solar Energy Inst, Energy Dept, TR-35100 Izmir, Turkiye
关键词
Hybrid system; concentrating solar power; biomass; exergoeconomic; exergoenvironmental; power generation; SYSTEM; ENERGY; PLANT;
D O I
10.1080/15567036.2023.2239747
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
In this study, hybrid renewable power systems (HRPS) based on biomass-fired (BF) and concentrating solar power (CSP) technologies are investigated. Parabolic trough collector (PTC), linear Fresnel reflector (LFR) and solar tower (ST) as CSP technologies are considered. This study aims to determine and compare exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental factors, as well as and the relative cost and environmental impact differences of three proposed HRPS options for the district of Faro in the province of Garoua, Cameroon. Also, advanced exergy destruction expressions are used. We found the optimized exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental factors for the subsystems of HRPS to be between 0.04-0.98 and 0.05-0.98, respectively. They have the highest values for the drying system (DS), and the lowest values for the solar-biomass field (SF+BF). The relative cost and environmental impact differences for the subsystems of HRPS are in the ranges of 0.07-0.79 and 0.28-0.96, respectively. They have the highest values for the DS, and the lowest values for the power block (PB). According to the levelized exergoeconomic/exergoenvironmental performances, PTC - BF presents the worst results before the optimization. ST - BF shows the best exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental performance in the optimization process. The results of the sensitivity and optimization analyses reveal that it is essential to conduct eco-indicator and advanced exergy analyses to avoid high environmental impact points and specific exergy destructions.
引用
收藏
页码:9668 / 9683
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] New procedure for optimal design and evaluation of cogeneration system based on advanced exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses
    Manesh, M. H. Khoshgoftar
    Navid, P.
    Blanco Marigorta, A. M.
    Amidpour, M.
    Hamedi, M. H.
    ENERGY, 2013, 59 : 314 - 333
  • [22] Thermodynamic and exergoeconomic analyses of a novel solar-based externally fired biomass combined cycle with hydrogen production
    Moharamian A.
    Adibi T.
    Ghahremani M.A.
    Soltani S.
    Rosen M.A.
    Mahmoudi S.M.S.
    International Journal of Ambient Energy, 2023, 44 (01) : 668 - 685
  • [23] Novel Carbon Capture System Coupled with Solar Energy and Power-to-Gas Design Based on Thermodynamic, Exergoeconomic, and Exergoenvironmental Analyses
    Li, Xuqing
    Li, Yajun
    ENERGY & FUELS, 2025,
  • [24] Performance Investigation of Geothermal Power Plant Based on Exergy and Exergoeconomic Analyses (Case Study: Sarulla Geothermal Power Plant)
    Sinaga, R. H. M.
    Saputra, D. W.
    9TH ANNUAL BASIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 2019 (BASIC 2019), 2019, 546
  • [25] Geothermal power generation improvement of organic Rankine flash cycle using exergy, advanced exergy and exergoeconomic analyses
    Li, Tailu
    Li, Xuelong
    Gao, Xiang
    Gao, Haiyang
    Meng, Nan
    APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 223
  • [26] Advanced exergy and exergoeconomic analyses of Kalina cycle integrated with parabolic-trough solar collectors
    Boyaghchi, F. A.
    Sabaghian, M.
    SCIENTIA IRANICA, 2016, 23 (05) : 2247 - 2260
  • [27] HelioCon: A roadmap for advanced heliostat technologies for concentrating solar power
    Zhu, Guangdong
    Augustine, Chad
    Mitchell, Rebecca
    Muller, Matthew
    Kurup, Parthiv
    Zolan, Alexander
    Yellapantula, Shashank
    Brost, Randy
    Armijo, Kenneth
    Sment, Jeremy
    Schaller, Rebecca
    Gordon, Margaret
    Collins, Mike
    Coventry, Joe
    Pye, John
    Cholette, Michael
    Picotti, Giovanni
    Arjomandi, Maziar
    Emes, Matthew
    Potter, Daniel
    Rae, Michael
    SOLAR ENERGY, 2023, 264
  • [28] Energy, exergy, economic, environmental, advanced exergy and exergoeconomic (extended exergy) analysis of hybrid wind-solar power plant
    Jani, Hardik K.
    Kachhwaha, Surendra Singh
    Nagababu, Garlapati
    Das, Alok
    Ehyaei, M. A.
    ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 34 (07) : 2668 - 2704
  • [29] Energy, exergy and exergoenvironmental (3E) analyses of power plant integrated with heliostats solar field
    Eduardo J. C. Cavalcanti
    Jonathan L. B. Azevedo
    Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 2021, 43
  • [30] Energy, exergy and exergoenvironmental (3E) analyses of power plant integrated with heliostats solar field
    Cavalcanti, Eduardo J. C.
    Azevedo, Jonathan L. B.
    JOURNAL OF THE BRAZILIAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING, 2021, 43 (04)