Investigation of concentrating solar-biomass-fired power technologies based on advanced exergy, exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses

被引:1
|
作者
Biboum, Alain [1 ]
Yilanci, Ahmet [2 ,5 ]
Thierry, Sosso Mayi Olivier [3 ]
Yimen, Nasser [1 ]
Mouangue, Ruben [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Yaounde, Natl Adv Sch Engn, Mech & Ind Engn Dept, Yaounde, Cameroon
[2] Ege Univ, Solar Energy Inst, Energy Dept, Izmir, Turkiye
[3] Univ Douala, Adv Teachers Training Coll Tech Educ Douala, Lab Thermal & Environm, Douala, Cameroon
[4] Univ Douala, Polytech Higher Natl Sch, E3M Lab, Douala, Cameroon
[5] Ege Univ, Solar Energy Inst, Energy Dept, TR-35100 Izmir, Turkiye
关键词
Hybrid system; concentrating solar power; biomass; exergoeconomic; exergoenvironmental; power generation; SYSTEM; ENERGY; PLANT;
D O I
10.1080/15567036.2023.2239747
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
In this study, hybrid renewable power systems (HRPS) based on biomass-fired (BF) and concentrating solar power (CSP) technologies are investigated. Parabolic trough collector (PTC), linear Fresnel reflector (LFR) and solar tower (ST) as CSP technologies are considered. This study aims to determine and compare exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental factors, as well as and the relative cost and environmental impact differences of three proposed HRPS options for the district of Faro in the province of Garoua, Cameroon. Also, advanced exergy destruction expressions are used. We found the optimized exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental factors for the subsystems of HRPS to be between 0.04-0.98 and 0.05-0.98, respectively. They have the highest values for the drying system (DS), and the lowest values for the solar-biomass field (SF+BF). The relative cost and environmental impact differences for the subsystems of HRPS are in the ranges of 0.07-0.79 and 0.28-0.96, respectively. They have the highest values for the DS, and the lowest values for the power block (PB). According to the levelized exergoeconomic/exergoenvironmental performances, PTC - BF presents the worst results before the optimization. ST - BF shows the best exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental performance in the optimization process. The results of the sensitivity and optimization analyses reveal that it is essential to conduct eco-indicator and advanced exergy analyses to avoid high environmental impact points and specific exergy destructions.
引用
收藏
页码:9668 / 9683
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparative design-point and yearly advanced exergoenvironmental analyses of a solar-biomass organic Rankine cycle power plant
    Oyekale, Joseph
    Emagbetere, Eyere
    ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2022, 44 (04) : 10433 - 10449
  • [32] Performance assessment and system optimization of a combined cycle power plant (CCPP) based on exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses
    Kim, Minhyun
    Kim, Dongwoo
    Esfahani, Iman Janghorban
    Lee, Seungchul
    Kim, Minjeong
    Yoo, Changkyoo
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 34 (01) : 6 - 19
  • [33] Performance assessment and system optimization of a combined cycle power plant (CCPP) based on exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses
    Minhyun Kim
    Dongwoo Kim
    Iman Janghorban Esfahani
    Seungchul Lee
    Minjeong Kim
    Changkyoo Yoo
    Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2017, 34 : 6 - 19
  • [34] Exergy and exergoeconomic analyses of a combined cooling, heating, and power (CCHP) system based on dual-fuel of biomass and natural gas
    Yang, Kun
    Zhu, Neng
    Ding, Yan
    Chang, Chen
    Wang, Daquan
    Yuan, Tianhao
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 206 : 893 - 906
  • [35] Modeling and Optimization of a Solar-Driven System Coupled with Liquid Dehumidification and Absorption Refrigeration Based on Advanced Exergy and Exergoeconomic Analyses
    Xu, Aixiang
    Wang, Yizhang
    Yang, Lanxiang
    Luo, Xinyu
    Song, Tingting
    Liu, Zhiqiang
    Yang, Sheng
    ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2023, 11 (22): : 8386 - 8403
  • [36] Conventional and advanced exergy and exergoeconomic analysis of a biomass gasification based SOFC/GT cogeneration system
    Najar, Reza
    Kazemi, Admin
    Borji, Mehdi
    Nikian, Mohammad
    JOURNAL OF RENEWABLE AND SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2023, 15 (04)
  • [37] Energy, Exergy, Exergoeconomic and Emergy-Based Exergoeconomic (Emergoeconomic) Analyses of a Biomass Combustion Waste Heat Recovery Organic Rankine Cycle
    Effatpanah, Saeed Khojaste
    Ahmadi, Mohammad Hossein
    Delbari, Seyed Hamid
    Lorenzini, Giulio
    ENTROPY, 2022, 24 (02)
  • [38] Exergy, exergoeconomic optimization and exergoenvironmental analysis of a hybrid solar, wind, and marine energy power system: A strategy for carbon-free electrical production
    Zainul, Rahadian
    Basem, Ali
    Alfaker, Mohamad J.
    Sharma, Pawan
    Kumar, Abhishek
    Al-Bahrani, Mohammed
    Elawady, A.
    Abbas, Mohamed
    Fooladi, Hadi
    Pandey, Shatrudhan
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (16)
  • [39] Exergy and exergoeconomic analyses of solar and biomass electricityed trigeneration system integrated with organic Rankine cycle under thermodynamic function
    Yang, Kun
    Yang, Ziwei
    Du, Na
    Chen, Yuzhu
    Chai, Yufei
    Wang, Jiangjiang
    Cao, Lixiao
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2025, 243
  • [40] Advanced exergy and advanced exergoeconomic analyses of the partial heating supercritical CO2 power cycle for waste heat recovery
    Arman Zendehnam
    Fathollah Pourfayaz
    Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 2024, 149 : 3397 - 3414