Quantum annealing with error mitigation

被引:3
|
作者
Shingu, Yuta [1 ,2 ]
Nikuni, Tetsuro [1 ]
Kawabata, Shiro [2 ,3 ]
Matsuzaki, Yuichiro [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Tokyo Univ Sci, Grad Sch Sci, Dept Phys, Shinjuku Ku, Tokyo 1628601, Japan
[2] Natl Inst Adv Ind Sci & Technol, Global Res & Dev Ctr Business Quantum AI Technol G, 1-1-1 Umezono, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058568, Japan
[3] Natl Inst Adv Ind Sci & Technol, NEC AIST Quantum Technol Cooperat Res Lab, 1-1-1 Umezono, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058568, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevA.109.042606
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Quantum annealing (QA) is one of the methods to prepare a ground state of a problem Hamiltonian. In the absence of noise, QA can accurately estimate the ground -state energy if the adiabatic condition is satisfied. However, in practice, systems are known to suffer from decoherence. Meanwhile, considerable research effort has been devoted to noisy intermediate -scale quantum (NISQ) computation. For practical NISQ computation, many error -mitigation (EM) methods have been proposed to mitigate the effects of noise. This paper proposes a QA strategy combined with an EM method, namely, dual -state purification, to suppress the effects of decoherence. Our protocol consists of four parts: the conventional dynamics, single-qubit projective measurements, the Hamiltonian dynamics corresponding to an inverse map of the first dynamics, and postprocessing of the measurement results. Importantly, our protocol works without two-qubit gates that require pulse operations; hence, it is suitable for devices designed for practical QA. In addition, we present numerical calculations to show that our protocol is more accurate than the conventional QA in estimating the ground -state energy under decoherence.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Exploiting Quantum Assertions for Error Mitigation and Quantum Program Debugging
    Li, Peiyi
    Liu, Ji
    Li, Yangjia
    Zhou, Huiyang
    2022 IEEE 40TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER DESIGN (ICCD 2022), 2022, : 124 - 131
  • [42] Hybrid Quantum-Classical Algorithms and Quantum Error Mitigation
    Endo, Suguru
    Cai, Zhenyu
    Benjamin, Simon C.
    Yuan, Xiao
    JOURNAL OF THE PHYSICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN, 2021, 90 (03)
  • [43] Error Mitigation and Quantum-Assisted Simulation in the Error Corrected Regime
    Lostaglio, M.
    Ciani, A.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2021, 127 (20)
  • [44] Error Mitigation in the NISQ Era: Applying Measurement Error Mitigation Techniques to Enhance Quantum Circuit Performance
    Khan, Misha Urooj
    Kamran, Muhammad Ahmad
    Khan, Wajiha Rahim
    Ibrahim, Malik Muhammad
    Ali, Muhammad Umair
    Lee, Seung Won
    MATHEMATICS, 2024, 12 (14)
  • [45] Quantum error mitigation by hidden inverses protocol in superconducting quantum devices
    Leyton-Ortega, V
    Majumder, S.
    Pooser, R. C.
    QUANTUM SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 8 (01)
  • [46] Small Sampling Overhead Error Mitigation for Quantum Circuits
    Hsieh, Cheng-Yun
    Tsai, Hsin-Ying
    Lu, Yuan-Hsiang
    Li, James Chien-Mo
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN OF INTEGRATED CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS, 2024, 43 (03) : 826 - 839
  • [47] Variational Quantum-Neural Hybrid Error Mitigation
    Zhang, Shi-Xin
    Wan, Zhou-Quan
    Hsieh, Chang-Yu
    Yao, Hong
    Zhang, Shengyu
    ADVANCED QUANTUM TECHNOLOGIES, 2023, 6 (10)
  • [48] Exponentially tighter bounds on limitations of quantum error mitigation
    Quek, Yihui
    Franca, Daniel Stilck
    Khatri, Sumeet
    Meyer, Johannes Jakob
    Eisert, Jens
    NATURE PHYSICS, 2024, 20 (10) : 1648 - 1658
  • [49] Error Mitigation for Short-Depth Quantum Circuits
    Temme, Kristan
    Bravyi, Sergey
    Gambetta, Jay M.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2017, 119 (18)
  • [50] Unified multivariate trace estimation and quantum error mitigation
    Liang, Jin-Min
    Lv, Qiao-Qiao
    Wang, Zhi-Xi
    Fei, Shao-Ming
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2023, 107 (01)