Quantum annealing with error mitigation

被引:3
|
作者
Shingu, Yuta [1 ,2 ]
Nikuni, Tetsuro [1 ]
Kawabata, Shiro [2 ,3 ]
Matsuzaki, Yuichiro [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Tokyo Univ Sci, Grad Sch Sci, Dept Phys, Shinjuku Ku, Tokyo 1628601, Japan
[2] Natl Inst Adv Ind Sci & Technol, Global Res & Dev Ctr Business Quantum AI Technol G, 1-1-1 Umezono, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058568, Japan
[3] Natl Inst Adv Ind Sci & Technol, NEC AIST Quantum Technol Cooperat Res Lab, 1-1-1 Umezono, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058568, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevA.109.042606
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Quantum annealing (QA) is one of the methods to prepare a ground state of a problem Hamiltonian. In the absence of noise, QA can accurately estimate the ground -state energy if the adiabatic condition is satisfied. However, in practice, systems are known to suffer from decoherence. Meanwhile, considerable research effort has been devoted to noisy intermediate -scale quantum (NISQ) computation. For practical NISQ computation, many error -mitigation (EM) methods have been proposed to mitigate the effects of noise. This paper proposes a QA strategy combined with an EM method, namely, dual -state purification, to suppress the effects of decoherence. Our protocol consists of four parts: the conventional dynamics, single-qubit projective measurements, the Hamiltonian dynamics corresponding to an inverse map of the first dynamics, and postprocessing of the measurement results. Importantly, our protocol works without two-qubit gates that require pulse operations; hence, it is suitable for devices designed for practical QA. In addition, we present numerical calculations to show that our protocol is more accurate than the conventional QA in estimating the ground -state energy under decoherence.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Quantum Error Mitigation using Symmetry Expansion
    Cai, Zhenyu
    QUANTUM, 2021, 5
  • [32] Configurable Readout Error Mitigation in Quantum Workflows
    Beisel, Martin
    Barzen, Johanna
    Leymann, Frank
    Truger, Felix
    Weder, Benjamin
    Yussupov, Vladimir
    ELECTRONICS, 2022, 11 (19)
  • [33] Quantum Error Mitigation With Artificial Neural Network
    Kim, Changjun
    Park, Kyungdeock Daniel
    Rhee, June-Koo
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 188853 - 188860
  • [34] VAQEM: A Variational Approach to Quantum Error Mitigation
    Ravi, Gokul Subramanian
    Smith, Kaitlin N.
    Gokhale, Pranav
    Mari, Andrea
    Earnest, Nathan
    Javadi-Abhari, Ali
    Chong, Frederic T.
    2022 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON HIGH-PERFORMANCE COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE (HPCA 2022), 2022, : 288 - 303
  • [35] Optimization of Richardson extrapolation for quantum error mitigation
    Krebsbach, Michael
    Trauzettel, Bjoern
    Calzona, Alessio
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2022, 106 (06)
  • [36] Adaptive neural network for quantum error mitigation
    Adeniyi, Temitope Bolaji
    Kumar, Sathish A. P.
    QUANTUM MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2025, 7 (01)
  • [37] Quantum error mitigation by layerwise Richardson extrapolation
    Russo, Vincent
    Mari, Andrea
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2024, 110 (06)
  • [38] Quantum error mitigation by Pauli check sandwiching
    Alvin Gonzales
    Ruslan Shaydulin
    Zain H. Saleem
    Martin Suchara
    Scientific Reports, 13
  • [39] Quantum error mitigation for Fourier moment computation
    Kiss, Oriel
    Grossi, Michele
    Roggero, Alessandro
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2025, 111 (03)
  • [40] Quantum computation with universal error mitigation on a superconducting quantum processor
    Song, Chao
    Cui, Jing
    Wang, H.
    Hao, J.
    Feng, H.
    Li, Ying
    SCIENCE ADVANCES, 2019, 5 (09):