Taking the Shortcut: Simplifying Heuristics in Discrete Choice Experiments

被引:15
|
作者
Veldwijk, Jorien [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Marceta, Stella Maria [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Swait, Joffre Dan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lipman, Stefan Adriaan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
de Bekker-Grob, Esther Wilhelmina [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Sch Hlth Policy & Management, POB 1738, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Choice Modelling Ctr, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Ctr Hlth Econ Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
来源
基金
荷兰研究理事会;
关键词
ATTRIBUTE NON-ATTENDANCE; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; CONJOINT-ANALYSIS; HEALTH-CARE; HYPOTHETICAL BIAS; COGNITIVE-ABILITY; LINEAR-MODELS; WEB SURVEYS; PREFERENCES; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s40271-023-00625-y
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Health-related discrete choice experiments (DCEs) information can be used to inform decision-making on the development, authorisation, reimbursement and marketing of drugs and devices as well as treatments in clinical practice. Discrete choice experiment is a stated preference method based on random utility theory (RUT), which imposes strong assumptions on respondent choice behaviour. However, respondents may use choice processes that do not adhere to the normative rationality assumptions implied by RUT, applying simplifying decision rules that are more selective in the amount and type of processed information (i.e., simplifying heuristics). An overview of commonly detected simplifying heuristics in health-related DCEs is lacking, making it unclear how to identify and deal with these heuristics; more specifically, how researchers might alter DCE design and modelling strategies to accommodate for the effects of heuristics. Therefore, the aim of this paper is three-fold: (1) provide an overview of common simplifying heuristics in health-related DCEs, (2) describe how choice task design and context as well as target population selection might impact the use of heuristics, (3) outline DCE design strategies that recognise the use of simplifying heuristics and develop modelling strategies to demonstrate the detection and impact of simplifying heuristics in DCE study outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 315
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A review of research into discrete choice experiments in tourism: Launching the Annals of Tourism Research Curated Collection on Discrete Choice Experiments in Tourism
    Kemperman, Astrid
    ANNALS OF TOURISM RESEARCH, 2021, 87
  • [42] Simplifying with Free Choice
    Willer, Malte
    TOPOI-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF PHILOSOPHY, 2018, 37 (03): : 379 - 392
  • [43] Simplifying with Free Choice
    Malte Willer
    Topoi, 2018, 37 : 379 - 392
  • [44] Choice Consistency in Discrete Choice Experiments: Does Numeracy Skill Matter?
    Genie, Mesfin G.
    Poudel, Nabin
    Paolucci, Francesco
    Ngorsuraches, Surachat
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2024, 27 (11) : 1594 - 1604
  • [45] The Sensitivity and Specificity of Repeated and Dominant Choice Tasks in Discrete Choice Experiments
    Jonker, Marcel F.
    Roudijk, Bram
    Maas, Merit
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (08) : 1381 - 1389
  • [46] To choose or not? The value of discrete-choice experiments in rheumatology
    Janet E. Pope
    Nature Reviews Rheumatology, 2022, 18 : 433 - 434
  • [47] Discrete choice experiments of pharmacy services: a systematic review
    Caroline Vass
    Ewan Gray
    Katherine Payne
    International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 2016, 38 : 620 - 630
  • [48] Scale Heterogeneity in Healthcare Discrete Choice Experiments: A Primer
    Vass, Caroline M.
    Wright, Stuart
    Burton, Michael
    Payne, Katherine
    PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2018, 11 (02): : 167 - 173
  • [49] Simple models of discrete choice and their performance in bandit experiments
    Gans, Noah
    Knox, George
    Croson, Rachel
    M&SOM-MANUFACTURING & SERVICE OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2007, 9 (04) : 383 - 408
  • [50] What can discrete choice experiments do for you?
    Cleland, Jennifer
    Porteous, Terry
    Skatun, Diane
    MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2018, 52 (11) : 1113 - 1124