Taking the Shortcut: Simplifying Heuristics in Discrete Choice Experiments

被引:15
|
作者
Veldwijk, Jorien [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Marceta, Stella Maria [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Swait, Joffre Dan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lipman, Stefan Adriaan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
de Bekker-Grob, Esther Wilhelmina [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Sch Hlth Policy & Management, POB 1738, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Choice Modelling Ctr, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Ctr Hlth Econ Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
来源
基金
荷兰研究理事会;
关键词
ATTRIBUTE NON-ATTENDANCE; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; CONJOINT-ANALYSIS; HEALTH-CARE; HYPOTHETICAL BIAS; COGNITIVE-ABILITY; LINEAR-MODELS; WEB SURVEYS; PREFERENCES; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s40271-023-00625-y
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Health-related discrete choice experiments (DCEs) information can be used to inform decision-making on the development, authorisation, reimbursement and marketing of drugs and devices as well as treatments in clinical practice. Discrete choice experiment is a stated preference method based on random utility theory (RUT), which imposes strong assumptions on respondent choice behaviour. However, respondents may use choice processes that do not adhere to the normative rationality assumptions implied by RUT, applying simplifying decision rules that are more selective in the amount and type of processed information (i.e., simplifying heuristics). An overview of commonly detected simplifying heuristics in health-related DCEs is lacking, making it unclear how to identify and deal with these heuristics; more specifically, how researchers might alter DCE design and modelling strategies to accommodate for the effects of heuristics. Therefore, the aim of this paper is three-fold: (1) provide an overview of common simplifying heuristics in health-related DCEs, (2) describe how choice task design and context as well as target population selection might impact the use of heuristics, (3) outline DCE design strategies that recognise the use of simplifying heuristics and develop modelling strategies to demonstrate the detection and impact of simplifying heuristics in DCE study outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 315
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Would a simple attention-reminder in discrete choice experiments affect heuristics, preferences, and willingness to pay for livestock market facilities?
    Kassie, Girma T.
    Zeleke, Fresenbet
    Birhanu, Mulugeta Yitayih
    Scarpa, Riccardo
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (07):
  • [22] Reconceptualising the External Validity of Discrete Choice Experiments
    Emily Lancsar
    Joffre Swait
    PharmacoEconomics, 2014, 32 : 951 - 965
  • [23] Unraveling hypothetical bias in discrete choice experiments
    Menapace, Luisa
    Raffaelli, Roberta
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2020, 176 : 416 - 430
  • [24] Use of discrete choice experiments to elicit preferences
    Ryan, M
    Bate, A
    Eastmond, CJ
    Ludbrook, A
    QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2001, 10 : I55 - I60
  • [25] THE STATUS QUO IN DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENTS: IS IT RELEVANT?
    Mohamad, Wan Norhidayah W.
    Willis, Ken
    Powe, Neil
    SINGAPORE ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2020, 65 (02): : 507 - 532
  • [26] A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENTS IN HEMOPHILIA
    Botteman, M.
    Martin, S.
    Ng, X.
    Joshi, N.
    Shah, R.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S470 - S470
  • [27] Response Strategies and Learning in Discrete Choice Experiments
    Scheufele, Gabriela
    Bennett, Jeff
    ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2012, 52 (03): : 435 - 453
  • [28] Discrete choice experiments-A unified approach
    Das, Ashish
    Singh, Rakhi
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 2020, 205 : 193 - 202
  • [29] Ethical Considerations for Discrete Choice Experiments with Caregivers
    Illes, Judy
    Lawson, Ashley
    McDonald, Patrick J.
    JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2022, 17 (04) : 426 - 430
  • [30] Specification of the Utility Function in Discrete Choice Experiments
    van der Pol, Marjon
    Currie, Gillian
    Kromm, Seija
    Ryan, Mandy
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (02) : 297 - 301