Taking the Shortcut: Simplifying Heuristics in Discrete Choice Experiments

被引:15
|
作者
Veldwijk, Jorien [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Marceta, Stella Maria [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Swait, Joffre Dan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lipman, Stefan Adriaan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
de Bekker-Grob, Esther Wilhelmina [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Sch Hlth Policy & Management, POB 1738, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Choice Modelling Ctr, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Ctr Hlth Econ Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
来源
基金
荷兰研究理事会;
关键词
ATTRIBUTE NON-ATTENDANCE; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; CONJOINT-ANALYSIS; HEALTH-CARE; HYPOTHETICAL BIAS; COGNITIVE-ABILITY; LINEAR-MODELS; WEB SURVEYS; PREFERENCES; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s40271-023-00625-y
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Health-related discrete choice experiments (DCEs) information can be used to inform decision-making on the development, authorisation, reimbursement and marketing of drugs and devices as well as treatments in clinical practice. Discrete choice experiment is a stated preference method based on random utility theory (RUT), which imposes strong assumptions on respondent choice behaviour. However, respondents may use choice processes that do not adhere to the normative rationality assumptions implied by RUT, applying simplifying decision rules that are more selective in the amount and type of processed information (i.e., simplifying heuristics). An overview of commonly detected simplifying heuristics in health-related DCEs is lacking, making it unclear how to identify and deal with these heuristics; more specifically, how researchers might alter DCE design and modelling strategies to accommodate for the effects of heuristics. Therefore, the aim of this paper is three-fold: (1) provide an overview of common simplifying heuristics in health-related DCEs, (2) describe how choice task design and context as well as target population selection might impact the use of heuristics, (3) outline DCE design strategies that recognise the use of simplifying heuristics and develop modelling strategies to demonstrate the detection and impact of simplifying heuristics in DCE study outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 315
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Minimum aberration designs for discrete choice experiments
    Jaynes J.
    Xu H.
    Wong W.K.
    Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice, 2017, 11 (2) : 339 - 360
  • [32] Reconceptualising the External Validity of Discrete Choice Experiments
    Lancsar, Emily
    Swait, Joffre
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2014, 32 (10) : 951 - 965
  • [33] Discrete choice experiments: a primer for the communication researcher
    Reynolds, Reed M.
    Popova, Lucy
    Yang, Bo
    Louviere, Jordan
    Thrasher, James F.
    FRONTIERS IN COMMUNICATION, 2025, 10
  • [34] Response Strategies and Learning in Discrete Choice Experiments
    Gabriela Scheufele
    Jeff Bennett
    Environmental and Resource Economics, 2012, 52 : 435 - 453
  • [35] Characterization and Optimal Designs for Discrete Choice Experiments
    Chai, Feng-Shun
    Das, Ashish
    Manna, Soumen
    STATISTICS AND APPLICATIONS, 2019, 17 (01): : 85 - 103
  • [36] Tracking position premiums in discrete choice experiments
    Palma, Marco A.
    Behe, Bridget K.
    Hall, Charles R.
    Huddleston, Patricia T.
    Fernandez, Tom
    APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2016, 23 (18) : 1269 - 1273
  • [37] Substitution Effects in Spatial Discrete Choice Experiments
    Marije Schaafsma
    Roy Brouwer
    Environmental and Resource Economics, 2020, 75 : 323 - 349
  • [38] An introduction to "discrete choice experiments" for behavior analysts
    Friedel, Jonathan E.
    Foreman, Anne M.
    Wirth, Oliver
    BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES, 2022, 198
  • [39] Substitution Effects in Spatial Discrete Choice Experiments
    Schaafsma, Marije
    Brouwer, Roy
    ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2020, 75 (02): : 323 - 349
  • [40] REDUCING COGNITIVE BURDEN IN DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENTS
    Goossens, L. M.
    Jonker, M. F.
    Rutten-van Molken, M. P.
    Boland, M. R.
    Slok, A. H.
    Salome, P. L.
    Van Schayck, O. C.
    In t Veen, J. C.
    Stolk, E. A.
    Donkers, B.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (09) : A762 - A762