A comparative study on the accuracy of an automated multi-parameter high-dose-rate brachytherapy quality assurance system

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, Jing [1 ]
Jia, Mengyu [2 ]
Yuan, Zhiyong [1 ]
Qian, Shaowen [3 ]
Zhang, Daguang [1 ]
Wang, Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Med Univ Canc Inst & Hosp, Key Lab Canc Prevent & Therapy, Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc, Dept Radiat Oncol,Tianjins Clin Res Ctr Canc, Tianjin 300060, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Univ, Sch Precis Instrument & Optoelect Engn, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
[3] 960th Hosp Joint Logist Support Force PLA, Dept Med Imaging, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
High-dose-rate brachytherapy; Quality assurance; Afterloader; RADIATION-THERAPY; CANCER; AAPM;
D O I
10.1016/j.radphyschem.2023.111472
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
This study aims to explore the measuring accuracy of an automated high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR BT) quality assurance system (hereinafter referred to as OriQA system) that could provide simultaneous measurements of dwell position, dwell time and source strength in a single test. Elekta-Flexitron was selected as the HDR BT afterloader, and measured the farthest transmission distance by source position simulator. Within the effective distance, we set dwell positions in two groups, specifically, plan_1 with an interval of 2.00 cm: 106.00 cm, 108.00 cm, 110.00 cm, 102.00 cm, 104.00 cm, 106.00 cm, 108.00 cm, and plan_2 with an interval of 0.20 cm: 111.40 cm, 111.60 cm, 111.80 cm, 112.00 cm, 112.20 cm, 112.40 cm, 112.60 cm. The measured values collected from OriQA device were compared with the data from traditional HDR BT QA tool (source position check ruler). Three groups of dwell time were set, specifically, plan_1: with fixed dwell time 2.00 s, plan_3 with interval 0.10 s: 3.70 s, 3.80 s, 3.90 s, 4.00 s, 4.10 s, 4.20 s, 4.30 s, and plan_4: fixed dwell time 5.00 s. Source strength was also measured continuously for a period of 10 weeks, and compared with the data collected from the well-chamber. The OriQA system showed reliable performance in the evaluation of measuring accuracy. The adjusted farthest transmission distance was 119.33 cm. And according to the time-position graph, the maximum deviation of dwell position between the measured and planned data was 0.34 mm, which was smaller than that between the ruler and planed data (0.75 mm). The maximum deviation of dwell time between the measured and planned data was 0.05 s. Fitting analysis revealed linear relationship between source strength Sk and the intensity detector response, with R2 = 0.9877, and intensity deviation fluctuated between 1.14% and 2.19%. Compared with the traditional QA tool, the OriQA device provided improved measuring accuracy and efficiency QA procedure for HDR BT.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Practical implementation of quality improvement for high-dose-rate brachytherapy
    Schubert, Leah
    Liu, Arthur
    Gan, Gregory
    Amini, Arya
    Hutchison, Rebecca
    Ernest, Janyce
    Thornton, Dale
    Stoehr, Scott
    Hinman, Bonnie
    Stuhr, Kelly
    Westerly, David
    Schefter, Tracey
    Fisher, Christine
    PRACTICAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2016, 6 (01) : 34 - 43
  • [22] A user-oriented procedure for the commissioning and quality assurance testing of treatment planning system dosimetry in high-dose-rate brachytherapy
    Peppa, Vasiliki
    Pantelis, Evaggelos
    Pappas, Eleftherios
    Lahanas, Vasileios
    Loukas, Constantinos
    Papagiannis, Panagiotis
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2016, 15 (02) : 252 - 262
  • [23] Automated source tracking with a pinhole imaging system during high-dose-rate brachytherapy treatment
    Watanabe, Yusuke
    Muraishi, Hiroshi
    Takei, Hideyuki
    Hara, Hidetake
    Terazaki, Tsuyoshi
    Shuto, Nobuaki
    Shimo, Takahiro
    Nozawa, Marika
    Ishiyama, Hiromichi
    Hayakawa, Kazushige
    Gomi, Tsutomu
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2018, 63 (14):
  • [24] Commissioning Integrated System in High-Dose-Rate (HDR) Brachytherapy
    Saw, C.
    Juliano, J.
    Wagner, H.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (06) : 3516 - U64
  • [25] Deep learning for automated applicator reconstruction in high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy
    Deufel, C.
    Weishaupt, L.
    Sayed, H. Kamal
    Choo, C.
    Stish, B.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 158 : S164 - S165
  • [26] High-Dose-Rate Prostate Brachytherapy Consistently Results in High Quality Dosimetry
    White, Evan C.
    Kamrava, Mitchell R.
    Demarco, John
    Park, Sang-June
    Wang, Pin-Chieh
    Kayode, Oluwatosin
    Steinberg, Michael L.
    Demanes, D. Jeffrey
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2013, 85 (02): : 543 - 548
  • [27] An Automated Treatment Plan Quality Assurance Program for Tandem and Ovoid High Dose-Rate Brachytherapy
    Tan, J.
    Shi, F.
    Hrycushko, B.
    Medin, P.
    Stojadinovic, S.
    Pompos, A.
    Yang, M.
    Albuquerque, K.
    Jia, X.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (06) : 3594 - 3594
  • [28] Quality of life after high-dose-rate brachytherapy monotherapy for prostate cancer
    Contreras, Jessika A.
    Wilder, Richard B.
    Mellon, Eric A.
    Strom, Tobin J.
    Fernandez, Daniel C.
    Biagioli, Matthew C.
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2015, 41 (01): : 40 - 45
  • [29] The Effect of Needle Number on the Quality of High-dose-rate Prostate Brachytherapy Implants
    Froehlich, Georgina
    Agoston, Peter
    Loevey, Jozsef
    Polgar, Csaba
    Major, Tibor
    PATHOLOGY & ONCOLOGY RESEARCH, 2010, 16 (04) : 593 - 599
  • [30] Saddle block analgesia for high-dose-rate brachytherapy: A prospective study
    Clarke, Hance A.
    Tarshis, Jordan
    Lam-McCulloch, Jenny
    Kay, Joseph
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2009, 8 (04) : 335 - 338