Comparison of Easydo Activator, ultrasonic and needle irrigation techniques on sealer penetration and smear layer removal in vitro

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, Shao-Hui [1 ,2 ]
Gao, Zheng-Rong [1 ]
Zhou, Ying-Hui [3 ,4 ]
Tan, Li [1 ]
Feng, Yao [1 ]
Ye, Qin [1 ]
Zhao, Jie [1 ]
Zhao, Ya-Qiong [1 ]
Hu, Jing [1 ]
Chen, Yun [1 ]
Liu, Qiong [1 ]
Aimee, Dusenge Marie [1 ]
Guo, Yue [1 ]
Feng, Yun-Zhi [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp 2, Hunan Prov Clin Res Ctr Oral Dis, Hunan Prov Engn Res Ctr Digital Oral & Maxillofaci, Changsha 410011, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Hubei Univ Arts & Sci, Xiangyang Cent Hosp, Dept Stomatol, Affiliated Hosp, Xiangyang 441000, Hubei, Peoples R China
[3] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp 2, Dept Ultrasound Diag, Changsha 410011, Hunan, Peoples R China
[4] Cent South Univ, Natl Clin Res Ctr Metab Dis, Dept Metab & Endocrinol, Hunan Prov Key Lab Metab Bone Dis,Xiangya Hosp 2, Changsha 410011, Hunan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Irrigation; Root canal therapy; Sealer penetration; Smear layer removal; Easydo activator; Scanning electron microscopy; Confocal laser scanning microscopy; DENTINAL TUBULE PENETRATION; APICAL; 3RD; ROOT; CANALS; VIBRINGE; EFFICACY; SYRINGE; SYSTEM; TEETH; MTA;
D O I
10.1186/s12903-023-03833-y
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The effects of Easydo Activator (EA), a new sonic irrigation system, on sealer penetration at the root apex were compared to needle irrigation (NI) and passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) in this study. Forty-two single-rooted teeth were prepared and randomly divided into three groups (n = 14): group 1: NI; group 2: PUI; and group 3: EA. A solution of 3% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) was used for irrigation. Nine teeth in each group were filled with AH Plus sealer mixed with CY5 fluorescent dye and a single gutta-percha cone. The sealer penetration area, maximum penetration depth and percentage of sealer penetration at 5 mm and 1 mm from the apex were analyzed by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). The remaining 5 teeth in each group were subjected to test smear layer scores by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The CLSM evaluation showed that increases in the area, depth and percentage of sealer penetration were detected at 1 and 5 mm from the root apex in the PUI group compared with the NI group, and greater increases were observed in the EA group (P < 0.05). The SEM experiment showed that the lowest scores for the smear layer and debris removal were achieved by the EA group when compared with the PUI and NI groups (P < 0.05). In conclusion, EA was superior to PUI and NI regarding sealer penetration at the root apex during endodontic treatment, and it could provide a new technical idea for clinical root canal therapy.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Smear layer removal and sealer penetration with different tapers after using photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming technique
    Islam Mohamed Eldeeb
    Nawar Naguib Nawar
    Shehabeldin Mohamed Saber
    Ehab El-Sayed Hassanein
    Edgar Schäfer
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2021, 25 : 5025 - 5032
  • [32] Comparison of a Continuous Ultrasonic Irrigation Device and Conventional Needle Irrigation in the Removal of Root Canal Debris
    Curtis, Tyson O.
    Sedgley, Christine M.
    JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2012, 38 (09) : 1261 - 1264
  • [33] Smear layer removal with passive ultrasonic irrigation and the NaviTip FX: a scanning electron microscopic study
    Goel, Shweta
    Tewari, Sanjay
    ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY, 2009, 108 (03): : 465 - 470
  • [34] Comparative evaluation of various irrigation techniques on smear layer removal: A scanning electron microscopy study
    Patil, Roopa
    Hegde, Prashant
    Shah, Rashmi R.
    Chandran, Amritha
    Sasirekha, K.
    Rakshit, B. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EARLY CHILDHOOD SPECIAL EDUCATION, 2022, 14 (05) : 3765 - 3768
  • [35] A sem assessment of smear layer removal by edta irrigation in furcation after hand and ultrasonic instrumentation.
    Ferreira, ZA
    Sampaio, JEC
    Pilatti, GL
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2003, 82 : 290 - 290
  • [36] Smear layer removal by passive ultrasonic irrigation and 2 new mechanical methods for activation of the chelating solution
    Machado, Ricardo
    da Silva, Isadora
    Comparin, Daniel
    Marques de Mattos, Bianca Araujo
    Alberton, Luiz Romulo
    da Silva Neto, Ulisses Xavier
    RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY AND ENDODONTICS, 2021, 46 (01):
  • [37] Investigation of the effectiveness of sonic, ultrasonic and new laser-assisted irrigation activation methods on smear removal and tubular penetration
    Gülşah Uslu
    Mustafa Gündoğar
    Mete Üngör
    Taha Özyürek
    Erhan Erkan
    Neslihan Büşra Keskin
    Lasers in Medical Science, 38
  • [38] Investigation of the effectiveness of sonic, ultrasonic and new laser-assisted irrigation activation methods on smear removal and tubular penetration
    Uslu, Gulsah
    Gundogar, Mustafa
    Ungor, Mete
    Ozyurek, Taha
    Erkan, Erhan
    Keskin, Neslihan Busra
    LASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 38 (01)
  • [39] An in vitro comparison of irrigation using photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming, ultrasonic, sonic and needle techniques in removing calcium hydroxide
    Arslan, H.
    Akcay, M.
    Capar, I. D.
    Saygili, G.
    Gok, T.
    Ertas, H.
    INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2015, 48 (03) : 246 - 251
  • [40] Comparison of sealer penetration of sonic activation versus conventional needle irrigation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Tan, Li
    Liu, Qiong
    Chen, Yun
    Zhao, Ya-Qiong
    Zhao, Jie
    Dusenge, Marie Aimee
    Feng, Yao
    Ye, Qin
    Hu, Jing
    Ou-Yang, Ze-Yue
    Zhou, Ying-Hui
    Guo, Yue
    Feng, Yun-Zhi
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2022, 22 (01)