Comparison of Easydo Activator, ultrasonic and needle irrigation techniques on sealer penetration and smear layer removal in vitro

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, Shao-Hui [1 ,2 ]
Gao, Zheng-Rong [1 ]
Zhou, Ying-Hui [3 ,4 ]
Tan, Li [1 ]
Feng, Yao [1 ]
Ye, Qin [1 ]
Zhao, Jie [1 ]
Zhao, Ya-Qiong [1 ]
Hu, Jing [1 ]
Chen, Yun [1 ]
Liu, Qiong [1 ]
Aimee, Dusenge Marie [1 ]
Guo, Yue [1 ]
Feng, Yun-Zhi [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp 2, Hunan Prov Clin Res Ctr Oral Dis, Hunan Prov Engn Res Ctr Digital Oral & Maxillofaci, Changsha 410011, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Hubei Univ Arts & Sci, Xiangyang Cent Hosp, Dept Stomatol, Affiliated Hosp, Xiangyang 441000, Hubei, Peoples R China
[3] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp 2, Dept Ultrasound Diag, Changsha 410011, Hunan, Peoples R China
[4] Cent South Univ, Natl Clin Res Ctr Metab Dis, Dept Metab & Endocrinol, Hunan Prov Key Lab Metab Bone Dis,Xiangya Hosp 2, Changsha 410011, Hunan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Irrigation; Root canal therapy; Sealer penetration; Smear layer removal; Easydo activator; Scanning electron microscopy; Confocal laser scanning microscopy; DENTINAL TUBULE PENETRATION; APICAL; 3RD; ROOT; CANALS; VIBRINGE; EFFICACY; SYRINGE; SYSTEM; TEETH; MTA;
D O I
10.1186/s12903-023-03833-y
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The effects of Easydo Activator (EA), a new sonic irrigation system, on sealer penetration at the root apex were compared to needle irrigation (NI) and passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) in this study. Forty-two single-rooted teeth were prepared and randomly divided into three groups (n = 14): group 1: NI; group 2: PUI; and group 3: EA. A solution of 3% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) was used for irrigation. Nine teeth in each group were filled with AH Plus sealer mixed with CY5 fluorescent dye and a single gutta-percha cone. The sealer penetration area, maximum penetration depth and percentage of sealer penetration at 5 mm and 1 mm from the apex were analyzed by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). The remaining 5 teeth in each group were subjected to test smear layer scores by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The CLSM evaluation showed that increases in the area, depth and percentage of sealer penetration were detected at 1 and 5 mm from the root apex in the PUI group compared with the NI group, and greater increases were observed in the EA group (P < 0.05). The SEM experiment showed that the lowest scores for the smear layer and debris removal were achieved by the EA group when compared with the PUI and NI groups (P < 0.05). In conclusion, EA was superior to PUI and NI regarding sealer penetration at the root apex during endodontic treatment, and it could provide a new technical idea for clinical root canal therapy.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effect of passive ultrasonic irrigation and manual dynamic irrigation on smear layer removal from root canals in a closed apex in vitro model
    Andrabi, Syed Mukhtar-Un-Nisar
    Kumar, Ashok
    Zia, Afaf
    Iftekhar, Huma
    Alam, Sharique
    Siddiqui, Shiraz
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL DENTISTRY, 2014, 5 (03) : 188 - 193
  • [22] Comparison of Three Final Irrigation Activation Techniques: Effects on Canal Cleanness, Smear Layer Removal, and Dentinal Tubule Penetration of Two Root Canal Sealers
    Turkel, Elmas
    Onay, Emel Olga
    Ungor, Mete
    PHOTOMEDICINE AND LASER SURGERY, 2017, 35 (12) : 672 - 681
  • [23] Effectiveness of Triton Irrigation Solution in Smear Layer Removal: An in-vitro Study
    Oraim, Huda Wakas
    Al-Zaka, Iman Mohammed
    EUROPEAN ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2024, 9 (02): : 139 - 145
  • [24] Smear Layer Removal and Canal Cleanliness Using Different Irrigation Systems (Endo Activator, Endo Vac, and Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation): Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopic Evaluation in an In Vitro Study
    Mancini, Manuele
    Cerroni, Loredana
    Iorio, Lorenzo
    Armellin, Emiliano
    Conte, Gabriele
    Cianconi, Luigi
    JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2013, 39 (11) : 1456 - 1460
  • [25] Smear Layer Removal Using Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation and Different Concentrations of Sodium Hypochlorite
    Orlowski, Nayra Bittencourt
    Schimdt, Tamer Ferreira
    Teixeira, Cleonice da Silveira
    Roberti Garcia, Lucas Fonseca
    Savaris, Julia Menezes
    Tay, Franklin R.
    Bortoluzzi, Eduardo Antunes
    JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2020, 46 (11) : 1738 - 1744
  • [26] Comparison of three irrigation methods: SWEEPS, ultrasonic, and traditional irrigation, in smear layer and debris removal abilities in the root canal, beyond the fractured instrument
    Vatanpour, Mehdi
    Toursavadkouhi, Sohrab
    Sajjad, Shirin
    PHOTODIAGNOSIS AND PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY, 2022, 37
  • [27] Smear layer removal and sealer penetration with different tapers after using photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming technique
    Eldeeb, Islam Mohamed
    Nawar, Nawar Naguib
    Saber, Shehabeldin Mohamed
    Hassanein, Ehab El-Sayed
    Schafer, Edgar
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2021, 25 (08) : 5025 - 5032
  • [28] Smear layer removal efficacy of different irrigation techniques in conservatively instrumented root canals
    Mochizuki, Sota
    Watanabe, Satoshi
    Liu, Jiayi
    Okiji, Takashi
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCIENCES, 2024, 19 (03) : 1546 - 1553
  • [29] Effectiveness of Different Irrigation Techniques on Post Space Smear Layer Removal: SEM Evaluation
    Iandolo, Alfredo
    Pisano, Massimo
    Abdellatif, Dina
    Amato, Alessandra
    Giordano, Francesco
    Buonavoglia, Alessio
    Sangiovanni, Giuseppe
    Caggiano, Mario
    PROSTHESIS, 2023, 5 (02): : 539 - 549
  • [30] Comparison of Smear Layer Removal Ability of QMix with Different Activation Techniques
    Arslan, Dilara
    Gunesen, Mehmet Burak
    Dincer, Asiye Nur
    Kustarci, Alper
    Er, Kursat
    Siso, Seyda Herguner
    JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2016, 42 (08) : 1279 - 1285