Comparison of Easydo Activator, ultrasonic and needle irrigation techniques on sealer penetration and smear layer removal in vitro

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, Shao-Hui [1 ,2 ]
Gao, Zheng-Rong [1 ]
Zhou, Ying-Hui [3 ,4 ]
Tan, Li [1 ]
Feng, Yao [1 ]
Ye, Qin [1 ]
Zhao, Jie [1 ]
Zhao, Ya-Qiong [1 ]
Hu, Jing [1 ]
Chen, Yun [1 ]
Liu, Qiong [1 ]
Aimee, Dusenge Marie [1 ]
Guo, Yue [1 ]
Feng, Yun-Zhi [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp 2, Hunan Prov Clin Res Ctr Oral Dis, Hunan Prov Engn Res Ctr Digital Oral & Maxillofaci, Changsha 410011, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Hubei Univ Arts & Sci, Xiangyang Cent Hosp, Dept Stomatol, Affiliated Hosp, Xiangyang 441000, Hubei, Peoples R China
[3] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp 2, Dept Ultrasound Diag, Changsha 410011, Hunan, Peoples R China
[4] Cent South Univ, Natl Clin Res Ctr Metab Dis, Dept Metab & Endocrinol, Hunan Prov Key Lab Metab Bone Dis,Xiangya Hosp 2, Changsha 410011, Hunan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Irrigation; Root canal therapy; Sealer penetration; Smear layer removal; Easydo activator; Scanning electron microscopy; Confocal laser scanning microscopy; DENTINAL TUBULE PENETRATION; APICAL; 3RD; ROOT; CANALS; VIBRINGE; EFFICACY; SYRINGE; SYSTEM; TEETH; MTA;
D O I
10.1186/s12903-023-03833-y
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The effects of Easydo Activator (EA), a new sonic irrigation system, on sealer penetration at the root apex were compared to needle irrigation (NI) and passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) in this study. Forty-two single-rooted teeth were prepared and randomly divided into three groups (n = 14): group 1: NI; group 2: PUI; and group 3: EA. A solution of 3% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) was used for irrigation. Nine teeth in each group were filled with AH Plus sealer mixed with CY5 fluorescent dye and a single gutta-percha cone. The sealer penetration area, maximum penetration depth and percentage of sealer penetration at 5 mm and 1 mm from the apex were analyzed by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). The remaining 5 teeth in each group were subjected to test smear layer scores by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The CLSM evaluation showed that increases in the area, depth and percentage of sealer penetration were detected at 1 and 5 mm from the root apex in the PUI group compared with the NI group, and greater increases were observed in the EA group (P < 0.05). The SEM experiment showed that the lowest scores for the smear layer and debris removal were achieved by the EA group when compared with the PUI and NI groups (P < 0.05). In conclusion, EA was superior to PUI and NI regarding sealer penetration at the root apex during endodontic treatment, and it could provide a new technical idea for clinical root canal therapy.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Effectiveness of passive ultrasonic irrigation time in the smear layer removal
    Tadeu, F.
    Madureira, R.
    Oliveira, O.
    Forner, L.
    BIODENTAL ENGINEERING II, 2014, : 35 - 37
  • [12] Comparison of Vibringe, EndoActivator, and Needle Irrigation on Sealer Penetration in Extracted Human Teeth
    Bolles, Jordan A.
    He, Jianing
    Svoboda, Kathy K. H.
    Schneiderman, Emet
    Glickman, Gerald N.
    JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2013, 39 (05) : 708 - 711
  • [13] Comparison of Sealer Penetration Using the EndoVac Irrigation System and Conventional Needle Root Canal Irrigation
    Tuncen, Aysun Kara
    Unal, Bayram
    JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2014, 40 (05) : 613 - 617
  • [14] Effectiveness of laser-assisted irrigation and passive ultrasonic irrigation techniques on smear layer removal in middle and apical thirds
    Ayranci, L. B.
    Arslan, H.
    Akcay, M.
    Capar, I. D.
    Gok, T.
    Saygili, G.
    SCANNING, 2016, 38 (02) : 121 - 127
  • [15] In Vitro Evaluation of Antibacterial Properties and Smear Layer Removal/Sealer Penetration of a Novel Silver-Citrate Root Canal Irrigant
    Tonini, Riccardo
    Giovarruscio, Massimo
    Gorni, Fabio
    Ionescu, Andrei
    Brambilla, Eugenio
    Mikhailovna, Irina Makeeva
    Luzi, Arlinda
    Pires, Paula Maciel
    Sauro, Salvatore
    MATERIALS, 2020, 13 (01)
  • [16] Comparison of the EndoVac System and Conventional Needle Irrigation on Removal of the Smear Layer in Primary Molar Root Canals
    Buldur, B.
    Kapdan, A.
    NIGERIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2017, 20 (09) : 1168 - 1174
  • [17] Efficacy of Different Final Irrigation Activation Techniques on Smear Layer Removal
    Saber, Hab El-Din
    Hashem, Ahmed Abdel Rahman
    JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2011, 37 (09) : 1272 - 1275
  • [18] Evaluation of 17% EDTA and 10% citric acid in smear layer removal and tubular dentin sealer penetration
    Machado, Ricardo
    Roberti Garcia, Lucas da Fonseca
    da Silva Neto, Ulisses Xavier
    da Cruz Filho, Antonio de Miranda
    Silva, Ricardo Gariba
    Vansan, Luiz Pascoal
    MICROSCOPY RESEARCH AND TECHNIQUE, 2018, 81 (03) : 275 - 282
  • [19] Evaluation of final irrigation regimens with maleic acid for smear layer removal and wettability of root canal sealer
    Ballal, Nidambur Vasudev
    Ferrer-Luque, Carmen Maria
    Sona, Mrunali
    Prabhu, K. Narayan
    Arias-Moliz, Teresa
    Baca, Pilar
    ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2018, 76 (03) : 199 - 203
  • [20] Comparison of irrigant activation devices and conventional needle irrigation on smear layer and debris removal in curved canals. (Smear layer removal from irrigant activation using SEM)
    Andreani, Yasmina
    Gad, Benjamin Thomas
    Cocks, Thomas Charles
    Harrison, Jonathan
    Keresztes, Mark Edward
    Pomfret, James Kennan
    Rees, Evan Benjamin
    Ma, Duoduo
    Baloun, Brett Lindsay
    Rahimi, Mehdi
    AUSTRALIAN ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2021, 47 (02) : 143 - 149