The Rate of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer on Repeat Biopsy after a Diagnosis of Atypical Small Acinar Proliferation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Ji, Wen-Tong [1 ]
Jin, Xue-Fei [1 ]
Wang, Yao [1 ]
机构
[1] Jilin Univ, Urol Dept 2, China Japan Union Hosp, Changchun, Jilin, Peoples R China
关键词
Atypical small acinar proliferation; Prostate biopsy; Prostate cancer; INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; NEEDLE-BIOPSY; HETEROGENEITY; UPDATE; INDEX;
D O I
10.1159/000535123
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: Atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP) is detected in approximately 5% of prostate biopsies. Current guidelines recommend a repeat biopsy within 3-6 months after the initial diagnosis. However, clinical significance and outcomes of repeat biopsy are conflicting. Based on this situation, we conducted a meta-analysis to report the rate of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) on repeat biopsy after a diagnosis of ASAP to determine the safety and validity of deferring repeat biopsy. Methods: We searched PubMed, Medline, Web of Science, and Embase databases for articles published until July 2023. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted the data, and assessed the risk of bias for the included studies. Pooled ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Stata 17. Results: Sixteen studies and 1,796 patients were included in the meta-analysis. A total of 553 patients were diagnosed with prostate cancer, and 204 had csPCa. The pooled rate of csPCa on repeat biopsy after ASAP diagnosis was 12.1% (95% CI: 0.09, 0.15), which is a relatively low progression rate. However, we observed heterogeneity among the 16 articles. Subgroup analysis was performed, and patients who underwent repeat biopsy within 6 months according to the guidelines had a lower csPCa incidence (effective size [ES] = 0.09, 95% CI: 0.060, 0.120) than those who underwent biopsy after more than 6 months (ES = 0.221, 95% CI: 0.094, 0.349). Conclusion: Repeat biopsy can be safely deferred for patients diagnosed with ASAP. We believe our results may help improve management strategies and encourage clinicians to choose more patient-friendly or non-invasive diagnostic evaluations.
引用
收藏
页码:631 / 640
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF SIGNIFICANT CANCER DETECTION BY MRI-TARGETED BIOPSY COMPARED TO SYSTEMATIC BIOPSY
    Kasivisvanathan, Veeru
    Stabile, Armando
    Neves, Joana
    Giganti, Francesco
    Valerio, Massimo
    Shanmugabavan, Yaalini
    Clement, Keiran
    Sarkar, Debashis
    Philippou, Yiannis
    Thurtle, David
    Deeks, Jon
    Emberton, Mark
    Takwoingi, Yemisi
    Moore, Caroline
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (04): : E341 - E341
  • [42] Micro-Ultrasound Imaging for Accuracy of Diagnosis in Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
    Zhang, Minhao
    Wang, Rong
    Wu, Yuqing
    Jing, Jibo
    Chen, Shuqiu
    Zhang, Guangyuan
    Xu, Bin
    Liu, Chunhui
    Chen, Ming
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2019, 9
  • [43] Comparison of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Targeted Biopsy With Systematic Biopsy Alone for the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Elwenspoek, Martha M. C.
    Sheppard, Athena L.
    McInnes, Matthew D. F.
    Merriel, Samuel W. D.
    Rowe, Edward W. J.
    Bryant, Richard J.
    Donovan, Jenny L.
    Whiting, Penny
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2019, 2 (08)
  • [44] Atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP) on initial extended prostate biopsy: Cancer detection on second and third extended biopsy
    Scattoni, V
    Roscigno, M
    Freschi, M
    Raber, M
    Briganti, A
    Fantini, G
    Rigatti, P
    Montorsi, F
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (04): : 476 - 476
  • [45] THE ABILITY OF MRI GUIDED BIOPSY TO DETECT CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Robertson, Nicola
    Moore, Caroline
    Villers, Arnauld
    Klotz, Laurence
    Emberton, Mark
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (04): : E491 - E492
  • [46] Proclarix, A New Biomarker for the Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Míriam Campistol
    Juan Morote
    Lucas Regis
    Ana Celma
    Jacques Planas
    Enrique Trilla
    Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy, 2022, 26 : 273 - 281
  • [47] Proclarix, A New Biomarker for the Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Campistol, Miriam
    Morote, Juan
    Regis, Lucas
    Celma, Ana
    Planas, Jacques
    Trilla, Enrique
    MOLECULAR DIAGNOSIS & THERAPY, 2022, 26 (03) : 273 - 281
  • [48] The role of the serum testosterone levels as a predictor of prostate cancer in patients with atypical small acinar proliferation at the first prostate biopsy
    Dell'Atti, Lucio
    Galosi, Andrea B.
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2018, 20 (01) : 15 - 18
  • [49] Association between adiposity after diagnosis of prostate cancer and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cariolou, Margarita
    Markozannes, Georgios
    Becerra-Tomas, Nerea
    Vieira, Rita
    Balducci, Katia
    Aune, Dagfinn
    Muller, David C.
    Chan, Doris S. M.
    Tsilidis, Konstantinos K.
    BMJ MEDICINE, 2023, 2 (01):
  • [50] Diagnostic Performance of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography-targeted biopsy for Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Kawada, Tatsushi
    Yanagisawa, Takafumi
    Rajwa, Pawel
    Motlagh, Reza Sari
    Mostafaei, Hadi
    Quhal, Fahad
    Laukhtina, Ekaterina
    Aydh, Abdulmajeed
    Keonig, Frederik
    Pallauf, Maximilian
    Pradere, Benjamin
    Ceci, Francesco
    Baltzer, Pascal A. T.
    Hacker, Marcus
    Rasul, Sazan
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    Araki, Motoo
    Nasu, Yasutomo
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2022, 5 (04): : 390 - 400