The Rate of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer on Repeat Biopsy after a Diagnosis of Atypical Small Acinar Proliferation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Ji, Wen-Tong [1 ]
Jin, Xue-Fei [1 ]
Wang, Yao [1 ]
机构
[1] Jilin Univ, Urol Dept 2, China Japan Union Hosp, Changchun, Jilin, Peoples R China
关键词
Atypical small acinar proliferation; Prostate biopsy; Prostate cancer; INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; NEEDLE-BIOPSY; HETEROGENEITY; UPDATE; INDEX;
D O I
10.1159/000535123
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: Atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP) is detected in approximately 5% of prostate biopsies. Current guidelines recommend a repeat biopsy within 3-6 months after the initial diagnosis. However, clinical significance and outcomes of repeat biopsy are conflicting. Based on this situation, we conducted a meta-analysis to report the rate of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) on repeat biopsy after a diagnosis of ASAP to determine the safety and validity of deferring repeat biopsy. Methods: We searched PubMed, Medline, Web of Science, and Embase databases for articles published until July 2023. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted the data, and assessed the risk of bias for the included studies. Pooled ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Stata 17. Results: Sixteen studies and 1,796 patients were included in the meta-analysis. A total of 553 patients were diagnosed with prostate cancer, and 204 had csPCa. The pooled rate of csPCa on repeat biopsy after ASAP diagnosis was 12.1% (95% CI: 0.09, 0.15), which is a relatively low progression rate. However, we observed heterogeneity among the 16 articles. Subgroup analysis was performed, and patients who underwent repeat biopsy within 6 months according to the guidelines had a lower csPCa incidence (effective size [ES] = 0.09, 95% CI: 0.060, 0.120) than those who underwent biopsy after more than 6 months (ES = 0.221, 95% CI: 0.094, 0.349). Conclusion: Repeat biopsy can be safely deferred for patients diagnosed with ASAP. We believe our results may help improve management strategies and encourage clinicians to choose more patient-friendly or non-invasive diagnostic evaluations.
引用
收藏
页码:631 / 640
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] PROSTATE CANCER DETECTION AFTER DIAGNOSIS OF ATYPICAL SMALL ACINAR PROLIFERATION
    Rosen, Alexandre
    Kiriluk, Kyle
    Eggener, Scott
    Paner, Gladell
    Gerber, Glen
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (04): : E776 - E776
  • [12] Predictors of prostate cancer detection at repeat biopsy in patients with previous diagnoses of atypical small acinar proliferation
    Yoo, Donghoon
    Baik, Seung
    Noh, Joon Hwa
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 116 : 7 - 8
  • [13] INCIDENCE OF CLINICALLY-SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER AFTER A DIAGNOSIS OF ATYPICAL SMALL ACINAR PROLIFERATION (ASAP), PROSTATIC INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA (PIN), OR BENIGN TISSUE
    Wiener, Scott
    Haddock, Peter
    Staff, Ilene
    Wagner, Joseph
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04): : E648 - E648
  • [14] Incidence of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer After a Diagnosis of Atypical Small Acinar Proliferation, High-grade Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia, or Benign Tissue
    Wiener, Scott
    Haddock, Peter
    Cusano, Joe
    Staff, Ilene
    McLaughlin, Tara
    Wagner, Joseph
    UROLOGY, 2017, 110 : 161 - 165
  • [15] PATHOLOGIC OUTCOMES AFTER REPEAT PROSTATE BIOPSIES FOR ATYPICAL SMALL ACINAR PROLIFERATION
    Lee, Olivia
    Rowe, Kasey
    Durbin-Johnson, Blythe
    VanNess, Michael
    Gandour-Edwards, Regina
    White, Ralph Devere
    Evans, Christopher
    Dall'Era, Marc
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (04): : E606 - E606
  • [16] Molecular Biomarkers for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Del Pino-Sedeno, Tasmania
    Infante-Ventura, Diego
    Castellano, Aythami de Armas
    De Pablos-Rodriguez, Pedro
    Rueda-Dominguez, Antonio
    Serrano-Aguilar, Pedro
    Trujillo-Martin, Maria M.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2022, 46 : 105 - 127
  • [17] Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection With Biparametric MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Cuocolo, Renato
    Verde, Francesco
    Ponsiglione, Andrea
    Romeo, Valeria
    Petretta, Mario
    Imbriaco, Massimo
    Stanzione, Arnaldo
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2021, 216 (03) : 608 - 621
  • [18] DOES ATYPICAL SMALL ACINAR PROLIFERATION ON 1ST REPEAT BIOPSY INCREASE PROSTATE CANCER DETECTION?
    Elshafei, Ahmed
    Moussa, Ayman S.
    Neifert, Heather
    Kartha, Ganesh
    Jones, J. Stephen
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (04): : E745 - E745
  • [19] Prostate cancer detection following diagnosis of atypical small acinar proliferation
    Ericson, Kyle J.
    Wenger, Hannah C.
    Rosen, Alexandre M.
    Kiriluk, Kyle J.
    Gerber, Glenn S.
    Paner, Gladell P.
    Eggener, Scott E.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 24 (02) : 8714 - 8720
  • [20] Repeat prostate biopsy protocol following a diagnosis of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and/or atypical small acinar proliferation
    Brimo, Fadi
    Corcos, Jacques
    Bismar, Tarek
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2006, 19 : 78 - 78