The Rate of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer on Repeat Biopsy after a Diagnosis of Atypical Small Acinar Proliferation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Ji, Wen-Tong [1 ]
Jin, Xue-Fei [1 ]
Wang, Yao [1 ]
机构
[1] Jilin Univ, Urol Dept 2, China Japan Union Hosp, Changchun, Jilin, Peoples R China
关键词
Atypical small acinar proliferation; Prostate biopsy; Prostate cancer; INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; NEEDLE-BIOPSY; HETEROGENEITY; UPDATE; INDEX;
D O I
10.1159/000535123
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: Atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP) is detected in approximately 5% of prostate biopsies. Current guidelines recommend a repeat biopsy within 3-6 months after the initial diagnosis. However, clinical significance and outcomes of repeat biopsy are conflicting. Based on this situation, we conducted a meta-analysis to report the rate of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) on repeat biopsy after a diagnosis of ASAP to determine the safety and validity of deferring repeat biopsy. Methods: We searched PubMed, Medline, Web of Science, and Embase databases for articles published until July 2023. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted the data, and assessed the risk of bias for the included studies. Pooled ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Stata 17. Results: Sixteen studies and 1,796 patients were included in the meta-analysis. A total of 553 patients were diagnosed with prostate cancer, and 204 had csPCa. The pooled rate of csPCa on repeat biopsy after ASAP diagnosis was 12.1% (95% CI: 0.09, 0.15), which is a relatively low progression rate. However, we observed heterogeneity among the 16 articles. Subgroup analysis was performed, and patients who underwent repeat biopsy within 6 months according to the guidelines had a lower csPCa incidence (effective size [ES] = 0.09, 95% CI: 0.060, 0.120) than those who underwent biopsy after more than 6 months (ES = 0.221, 95% CI: 0.094, 0.349). Conclusion: Repeat biopsy can be safely deferred for patients diagnosed with ASAP. We believe our results may help improve management strategies and encourage clinicians to choose more patient-friendly or non-invasive diagnostic evaluations.
引用
收藏
页码:631 / 640
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jianjian Xiang
    Huaqing Yan
    Jiangfeng Li
    Xiao Wang
    Hong Chen
    Xiangyi Zheng
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 17
  • [22] Transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xiang, Jianjian
    Yan, Huaqing
    Li, Jiangfeng
    Wang, Xiao
    Chen, Hong
    Zheng, Xiangyi
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 17 (1)
  • [23] mpMRI-targeted biopsy versus systematic biopsy for clinically significant prostate cancer diagnosis: a systematic review and metaanalysis
    Baccaglini, Willy
    Glina, Felipe P. A.
    Pazeto, Cristiano L.
    Bernardo, Wanderley M.
    Sanchez-Salas, Rafael
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2020, 30 (05) : 711 - 719
  • [24] WHO CAN SAFELY AVOID REPEAT PROSTATE BIOPSY FOLLOWING THE DETECTION OF ATYPICAL SMALL ACINAR PROLIFERATION?
    Kaneko, Masatomo
    Paralkar, Divyangi
    Ramacciotti, Lorenzo Storino
    Cacciamani, Giovanni E.
    Aron, Manju
    Hopstone, Michelle
    Duddalwar, Vinay
    Gill, Inderbir S.
    Abreu, Andre Luis
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 211 (05): : E786 - E787
  • [25] Identifying Optimal Prostate Biopsy Strategy for the Detection Rate of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) in Biopsy-Naïve Population
    Aloufi, Wafa D.
    Al Mopti, Abdulrahman
    Al-Tawil, Anas
    Huang, Zhihong
    Nabi, Ghulam
    CANCERS, 2025, 17 (03)
  • [26] Prostate cancer detection in men with an initial diagnosis of atypical small acinar proliferation
    Mancuso, Pascal A.
    Chabert, Charles
    Chin, Peter
    Kovac, Paul
    Skyring, Timothy
    Watt, William H.
    Napaki, Sabar
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2007, 99 (01) : 49 - 52
  • [27] Is There an Impact of Transperineal Versus Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy in Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection Rate? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Uleri, Alessandro
    Baboudjian, Michael
    Tedde, Alessandro
    Gallioli, Andrea
    Long-Depaquit, Thibaut
    Palou, Joan
    Basile, Giuseppe
    Gaya, Josep Maria
    Sanguedolce, Francesco
    Lughezzani, Giovanni
    Rajwa, Pawel
    Pradere, Benjamin
    Roupret, Morgan
    Briganti, Alberto
    Ploussard, Guillaume
    Breda, Alberto
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2023, 6 (06): : 621 - 628
  • [28] Prostate cancer diagnosed after initial biopsy with atypical small acinar proliferation suspicious for malignancy is similar to cancer found on initial biopsy
    Iczkowski, KA
    Chen, HM
    Yang, XMJ
    Beach, RA
    UROLOGY, 2002, 60 (05) : 851 - 854
  • [29] Atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP): Is a repeat biopsy necessary ASAP? A multi-institutional review
    A Leone
    B Gershman
    K Rotker
    C Butler
    J Fantasia
    A Miller
    A Afiadata
    A Amin
    A Zhou
    Z Jiang
    T Sebo
    A Mega
    S Schiff
    G Pareek
    D Golijanin
    J Yates
    R J Karnes
    J Renzulli
    Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 2016, 19 : 68 - 71
  • [30] Risk stratification for avoiding unnecessary prostate biopsy after atypical small acinar proliferation detection
    Kaneko, M.
    Paralkar, D.
    Ramacciotti, L. S.
    Cacciamani, G. E.
    Aron, M.
    Hopstone, M.
    Duddalwar, V.
    Gill, I. S.
    Abreu, A. L.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2024, 85 : S1670 - S1670