The Rate of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer on Repeat Biopsy after a Diagnosis of Atypical Small Acinar Proliferation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Ji, Wen-Tong [1 ]
Jin, Xue-Fei [1 ]
Wang, Yao [1 ]
机构
[1] Jilin Univ, Urol Dept 2, China Japan Union Hosp, Changchun, Jilin, Peoples R China
关键词
Atypical small acinar proliferation; Prostate biopsy; Prostate cancer; INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; NEEDLE-BIOPSY; HETEROGENEITY; UPDATE; INDEX;
D O I
10.1159/000535123
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: Atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP) is detected in approximately 5% of prostate biopsies. Current guidelines recommend a repeat biopsy within 3-6 months after the initial diagnosis. However, clinical significance and outcomes of repeat biopsy are conflicting. Based on this situation, we conducted a meta-analysis to report the rate of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) on repeat biopsy after a diagnosis of ASAP to determine the safety and validity of deferring repeat biopsy. Methods: We searched PubMed, Medline, Web of Science, and Embase databases for articles published until July 2023. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted the data, and assessed the risk of bias for the included studies. Pooled ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Stata 17. Results: Sixteen studies and 1,796 patients were included in the meta-analysis. A total of 553 patients were diagnosed with prostate cancer, and 204 had csPCa. The pooled rate of csPCa on repeat biopsy after ASAP diagnosis was 12.1% (95% CI: 0.09, 0.15), which is a relatively low progression rate. However, we observed heterogeneity among the 16 articles. Subgroup analysis was performed, and patients who underwent repeat biopsy within 6 months according to the guidelines had a lower csPCa incidence (effective size [ES] = 0.09, 95% CI: 0.060, 0.120) than those who underwent biopsy after more than 6 months (ES = 0.221, 95% CI: 0.094, 0.349). Conclusion: Repeat biopsy can be safely deferred for patients diagnosed with ASAP. We believe our results may help improve management strategies and encourage clinicians to choose more patient-friendly or non-invasive diagnostic evaluations.
引用
收藏
页码:631 / 640
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Rate of clinically significant prostate cancer on repeat saturation biopsy after a diagnosis of atypical small acinar proliferation
    Totaro, Angelo
    Di Gianfrancesco, Luca
    Pinto, Francesco
    Racioppi, Marco
    Palermo, Giuseppe
    Campetella, Marco
    Santoro, Agostino Antonio
    Arbia, Giuseppe
    Sacco, Emilio
    UROLOGIA JOURNAL, 2021, 88 (03) : 194 - 199
  • [2] Rate of clinically significant prostate cancer on repeated biopsy after a diagnosis of atypical small acinar proliferation
    Yazdani, Mohammad
    Samani, Payam Riahi
    Mazdak, Hamid
    Yazdani, Amid
    IMMUNOPATHOLOGIA PERSA, 2023, 9 (01):
  • [3] Rate of Gleason 7 or higher prostate cancer on repeat biopsy after a diagnosis of atypical small acinar proliferation
    C Warlick
    K Feia
    J Tomasini
    C Iwamoto
    B Lindgren
    M Risk
    Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 2015, 18 : 255 - 259
  • [4] Rate of Gleason 7 or higher prostate cancer on repeat biopsy after a diagnosis of atypical small acinar proliferation
    Warlick, C.
    Feia, K.
    Tomasini, J.
    Iwamoto, C.
    Lindgren, B.
    Risk, M.
    PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2015, 18 (03) : 255 - 259
  • [5] Implementation of repeat biopsy and detection of cancer after a diagnosis of atypical small acinar proliferation of the prostate
    Imanaka, Takahiro
    Yoshida, Takahiro
    Taniguchi, Ayumu
    Yamanaka, Kazuaki
    Kishikawa, Hidefumi
    Nishimura, Kenji
    MOLECULAR AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 13 (06) : 1 - 5
  • [6] Predictors of Prostate Cancer Diagnosis at repeat Prostate Biopsy in patients initially diagnosed with Atypical Small Acinar Proliferation
    Yucel, Cem
    Cakmak, Ozgur
    Yalbuzdag, Okan Nabi
    Celik, Orcun
    Keskin, Mehmet Zeynel
    Kozacioglu, Zafer
    KUWAIT MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 50 (04): : 406 - 409
  • [7] Predictive Factors of Prostate Cancer at Repeat Biopsy in Patients with an Initial Diagnosis of Atypical Small Acinar Proliferation of the Prostate
    Ryu, Jae Hyun
    Kim, Yun Beom
    Lee, Jeong Ki
    Kim, Yoon Jung
    Jung, Tae Young
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 51 (11) : 752 - 756
  • [8] Atypical Small Acinar Proliferation: Repeat Biopsy and Detection of High Grade Prostate Cancer
    Leone, Andrew
    Rotker, Katherine
    Butler, Christi
    Mega, Anthony
    Li, Jianhong
    Amin, Ali
    Schiff, Stephen F.
    Pareek, Gyan
    Golijanin, Dragan
    Renzulli, Joseph F., II
    PROSTATE CANCER, 2015, 2015
  • [9] OUTCOMES FOLLOWING REPEAT PROSTATE BIOPSY FOR ATYPICAL SMALL ACINAR PROLIFERATION
    Tomasini, Jeffrey
    Risk, Michael
    Feia, Kendall
    Lindgren, Bruce
    Iwamoto, Carlos
    Warlick, Christopher
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (04): : E821 - E821
  • [10] PREDICTORS OF PROSTATE CANCER DETECTION ON REPEAT BIOPSY IN MEN WITH AN ATYPICAL SMALL ACINAR PROLIFERATION ON INITIAL PROSTATE BIOPSY
    Kang, Taejin
    Park, Sejun
    Song, Cheryn
    Hong, Jun Hyuk
    Kim, Choung-Soo
    Ahn, Hanjong
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (04): : E816 - E816