Agronomic and phenotypic plant traits as indicators for environmental risks of genetically modified plants

被引:0
|
作者
Marion, Dolezel [1 ]
Marianne, Miklau [1 ]
Andreas, Heissenberger [1 ]
Mathias, Otto [2 ]
机构
[1] Umweltbundesamt GmbH, Spittelauer Lande 5, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[2] Fed Agcy Nat Conservat, Konstantinstr 110, D-53179 Bonn, Germany
关键词
GMO; Genetically modified plants; Risk assessment; Persistence; Invasiveness; Environmental risks; Agronomic and phenotypic characterization; BENTGRASS AGROSTIS-STOLONIFERA; MODIFIED OILSEED RAPE; CREEPING BENTGRASS; RELATIVE FITNESS; POLLEN VIABILITY; SEED VIGOR; GENE FLOW; WILD; PERSISTENCE; LONGEVITY;
D O I
10.1186/s12302-023-00828-y
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
BackgroundFor market approval of genetically modified plants (GMPs), the evaluation of agronomic and phenotypic plant traits is a standard requirement and part of the comparative assessment of the GMP and its conventional counterpart. This comparative assessment is a starting point for environmental risk assessment (ERA) and should inform all areas of risk. We scrutinize frequently used approaches to characterize GMPs in EU market applications and discuss their usefulness for drawing conclusions on risks related to the plant's ability to survive, persist or become invasive.ResultsOur analysis shows that the agronomic and phenotypic characterization of GMPs, although based on guidelines, is confined to plant traits and test designs that are relevant for the quality control and agronomic performance of genetically modified (GM) crops. We provide evidence of how methodological approaches frequently applied during the agronomic and phenotypic characterization of the GMP could be improved and complemented to better inform on potential phenotypic changes relevant to assessing environmental risks. These approaches refer to (i) the assessment of the survival of GM seeds and plants (e.g., volunteers); (ii) the consideration of environmental exposure and (iii) improved methodological approaches for the assessment of biotic and abiotic stress responses for GMPs.ConclusionsThe comparative assessment of agronomic and phenotypic plant traits currently does not provide suitable data to draw conclusions on environmental risks relating to the persistence and invasiveness of the GMP. Ecologically more realistic assessments should be part of the phenotypic characterization of GMPs and need guidance and decision criteria to be implemented in ERA. This is of considerable importance, as new genomic techniques are expected to increase the diversity and complexity of GM plants and traits, particularly stress tolerance, which may affect the survival of GMPs in the environment.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Impact of genetically engineered maize on agronomic, environmental and toxicological traits: a meta-analysis of 21 years of field data
    Pellegrino, Elisa
    Bedini, Stefano
    Nuti, Marco
    Ercoli, Laura
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2018, 8
  • [42] Environmental risks of chemicals and genetically modified organisms:: A comparison -: Part I:: Classification and characterisation of risks posed by chemicals and GMOs
    Steinhäuser, KG
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2001, 8 (02) : 120 - 126
  • [43] Probability functions to build composite indicators: A methodology to measure environmental impacts of genetically modified crops
    Areal, F. J.
    Riesgo, L.
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2015, 52 : 498 - 516
  • [44] Recent progress on environmental biosafety assessment of genetically modified trees and floricultural plants in Japan
    Kikuchi, Akira
    Watanabe, Kazuo
    Tanaka, Yoshikazu
    Kamada, Hiroshi
    PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2008, 25 (01) : 9 - 15
  • [45] Risk, Trust, and Consumer Acceptance of Plant Biotechnology: Implications for Genetically Modified Ornamental Plants
    Klingeman, W. E.
    Hall, C. R.
    JOURNAL OF CROP IMPROVEMENT, 2006, 18 (1-2) : 451 - 486
  • [46] Scientific Opinion on the use of existing environmental surveillance networks to support the post-market environmental monitoring of genetically modified plants EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs)
    Arpaia, Salvatore
    Birch, Andrew Nicholas Edmund
    Chesson, Andrew
    du Jardin, Patrick
    Gathmann, Achim
    Gropp, Juergen
    Herman, Lieve
    Hoen-Sorteberg, Hilde-Gunn
    Jones, Huw
    Kiss, Jozsef
    Kleter, Gijs
    Lagiou, Pagona
    Lovik, Martinus
    Messean, Antoine
    Naegeli, Hanspeter
    Nielsen, Kaare Magne
    Ovesna, Jaroslava
    Perry, Joe
    Rostoks, Nils
    Tebbe, Christoph
    EFSA JOURNAL, 2014, 12 (11)
  • [47] Evaluating environmental risks of genetically modified crops: ecological harm criteria for regulatory decision-making
    Sanvido, Olivier
    Romeis, Joerg
    Gathmann, Achim
    Gielkens, Marco
    Raybould, Alan
    Bigler, Franz
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2012, 15 (01) : 82 - 91
  • [48] Comparative environmental impact assessment of herbicides used on genetically modified and non-genetically modified herbicide-tolerant canola crops using two risk indicators
    Oliver, Danielle P.
    Kookana, Rai S.
    Miller, Rosalind B.
    Correll, Raymond L.
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 557 : 754 - 763
  • [49] Genetically modified plants and human health risks: Can additional research reduce uncertainties and increase public confidence?
    Hodgson, E
    TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2001, 63 (02) : 153 - 156
  • [50] Author Correction: Impact of genetically engineered maize on agronomic, environmental and toxicological traits: a meta-analysis of 21 years of field data
    Elisa Pellegrino
    Stefano Bedini
    Marco Nuti
    Laura Ercoli
    Scientific Reports, 8