Agronomic and phenotypic plant traits as indicators for environmental risks of genetically modified plants

被引:0
|
作者
Marion, Dolezel [1 ]
Marianne, Miklau [1 ]
Andreas, Heissenberger [1 ]
Mathias, Otto [2 ]
机构
[1] Umweltbundesamt GmbH, Spittelauer Lande 5, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[2] Fed Agcy Nat Conservat, Konstantinstr 110, D-53179 Bonn, Germany
关键词
GMO; Genetically modified plants; Risk assessment; Persistence; Invasiveness; Environmental risks; Agronomic and phenotypic characterization; BENTGRASS AGROSTIS-STOLONIFERA; MODIFIED OILSEED RAPE; CREEPING BENTGRASS; RELATIVE FITNESS; POLLEN VIABILITY; SEED VIGOR; GENE FLOW; WILD; PERSISTENCE; LONGEVITY;
D O I
10.1186/s12302-023-00828-y
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
BackgroundFor market approval of genetically modified plants (GMPs), the evaluation of agronomic and phenotypic plant traits is a standard requirement and part of the comparative assessment of the GMP and its conventional counterpart. This comparative assessment is a starting point for environmental risk assessment (ERA) and should inform all areas of risk. We scrutinize frequently used approaches to characterize GMPs in EU market applications and discuss their usefulness for drawing conclusions on risks related to the plant's ability to survive, persist or become invasive.ResultsOur analysis shows that the agronomic and phenotypic characterization of GMPs, although based on guidelines, is confined to plant traits and test designs that are relevant for the quality control and agronomic performance of genetically modified (GM) crops. We provide evidence of how methodological approaches frequently applied during the agronomic and phenotypic characterization of the GMP could be improved and complemented to better inform on potential phenotypic changes relevant to assessing environmental risks. These approaches refer to (i) the assessment of the survival of GM seeds and plants (e.g., volunteers); (ii) the consideration of environmental exposure and (iii) improved methodological approaches for the assessment of biotic and abiotic stress responses for GMPs.ConclusionsThe comparative assessment of agronomic and phenotypic plant traits currently does not provide suitable data to draw conclusions on environmental risks relating to the persistence and invasiveness of the GMP. Ecologically more realistic assessments should be part of the phenotypic characterization of GMPs and need guidance and decision criteria to be implemented in ERA. This is of considerable importance, as new genomic techniques are expected to increase the diversity and complexity of GM plants and traits, particularly stress tolerance, which may affect the survival of GMPs in the environment.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Problem formulation in the environmental risk assessment for genetically modified plants
    Wolt, Jeffrey D.
    Keese, Paul
    Raybould, Alan
    Fitzpatrick, Julie W.
    Burachik, Moises
    Gray, Alan
    Olin, Stephen S.
    Schiemann, Joachim
    Sears, Mark
    Wu, Felicia
    TRANSGENIC RESEARCH, 2010, 19 (03) : 425 - 436
  • [22] TERA: A tool for the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants
    Camastra, Francesco
    Ciaramella, Angelo
    Giovannelli, Valeria
    Lener, Mattes
    Rastelli, Valentina
    Staiano, Antonino
    Staiano, Giovanni
    Starace, Alfredo
    ECOLOGICAL INFORMATICS, 2014, 24 : 186 - 193
  • [23] Problem formulation in the environmental risk assessment for genetically modified plants
    Jeffrey D. Wolt
    Paul Keese
    Alan Raybould
    Julie W. Fitzpatrick
    Moisés Burachik
    Alan Gray
    Stephen S. Olin
    Joachim Schiemann
    Mark Sears
    Felicia Wu
    Transgenic Research, 2010, 19 : 425 - 436
  • [24] The environmental impacts of genetically modified plants: Challenges to decision making
    Batie, SS
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2003, 85 (05) : 1107 - 1111
  • [25] Environmental concerns and risks of genetically modified crops: Economic contributions to the debate
    Mooney, S
    Klein, KK
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D AGROECONOMIE, 1999, 47 (04): : 437 - 444
  • [26] Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms on the Post Market Environmental Monitoring (PMEM) of genetically modified plants
    Andersson, Hans Christer
    Bartsch, Detlef
    Buhk, Hans-Joerg
    Davies, Howard
    DeLoose, Marc
    Gasson, Michael
    Hendriksen, Niels
    Heritage, John
    Krenlampi, Sirpa
    Kryspin-Sorensen, Ilona
    Kuiper, Harry
    Nuti, Marco
    O'Gara, Fergal
    Puigdomenech, Pere
    Sakellaris, George
    Schiemann, Joachim
    Seinen, Willem
    Sessitsch, Angela
    Sweet, Jeremy
    Van Elsas, Jan Dirk
    Wal, Jean-Michel
    EFSA JOURNAL, 2006, 4 (03)
  • [27] Plant-associated and soil microbiota composition as a novel criterion for the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants
    Pepoyan, Astghik Z.
    Chikindas, Michael L.
    GM CROPS & FOOD-BIOTECHNOLOGY IN AGRICULTURE AND THE FOOD CHAIN, 2020, 11 (01): : 47 - 53
  • [28] Physiological and agronomic traits of cabbage plants hybrid Fuyutoyo® sprayed with plant growth regulators
    Zeist, Andre R.
    Piva, Rafael
    Resende, Juliano T. V.
    Silva, Israel F. L.
    Athanazio, Joao C.
    Rodrigues, Joao D.
    HORTICULTURA BRASILEIRA, 2017, 35 (02) : 210 - 215
  • [29] Monitoring carabid indicators could reveal environmental impacts of genetically modified maize
    Lee, Marina S.
    Albajes, Ramon
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST ENTOMOLOGY, 2016, 18 (03) : 238 - 249
  • [30] Environmental and agronomic monitoring of adverse effects due to cultivation of genetically modified herbicide tolerant crops
    Josef Soukup
    Josef Holec
    Miroslav Jursík
    Kateřina Hamouzová
    Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit, 2011, 6 : 125 - 130