Agronomic and phenotypic plant traits as indicators for environmental risks of genetically modified plants

被引:0
|
作者
Marion, Dolezel [1 ]
Marianne, Miklau [1 ]
Andreas, Heissenberger [1 ]
Mathias, Otto [2 ]
机构
[1] Umweltbundesamt GmbH, Spittelauer Lande 5, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[2] Fed Agcy Nat Conservat, Konstantinstr 110, D-53179 Bonn, Germany
关键词
GMO; Genetically modified plants; Risk assessment; Persistence; Invasiveness; Environmental risks; Agronomic and phenotypic characterization; BENTGRASS AGROSTIS-STOLONIFERA; MODIFIED OILSEED RAPE; CREEPING BENTGRASS; RELATIVE FITNESS; POLLEN VIABILITY; SEED VIGOR; GENE FLOW; WILD; PERSISTENCE; LONGEVITY;
D O I
10.1186/s12302-023-00828-y
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
BackgroundFor market approval of genetically modified plants (GMPs), the evaluation of agronomic and phenotypic plant traits is a standard requirement and part of the comparative assessment of the GMP and its conventional counterpart. This comparative assessment is a starting point for environmental risk assessment (ERA) and should inform all areas of risk. We scrutinize frequently used approaches to characterize GMPs in EU market applications and discuss their usefulness for drawing conclusions on risks related to the plant's ability to survive, persist or become invasive.ResultsOur analysis shows that the agronomic and phenotypic characterization of GMPs, although based on guidelines, is confined to plant traits and test designs that are relevant for the quality control and agronomic performance of genetically modified (GM) crops. We provide evidence of how methodological approaches frequently applied during the agronomic and phenotypic characterization of the GMP could be improved and complemented to better inform on potential phenotypic changes relevant to assessing environmental risks. These approaches refer to (i) the assessment of the survival of GM seeds and plants (e.g., volunteers); (ii) the consideration of environmental exposure and (iii) improved methodological approaches for the assessment of biotic and abiotic stress responses for GMPs.ConclusionsThe comparative assessment of agronomic and phenotypic plant traits currently does not provide suitable data to draw conclusions on environmental risks relating to the persistence and invasiveness of the GMP. Ecologically more realistic assessments should be part of the phenotypic characterization of GMPs and need guidance and decision criteria to be implemented in ERA. This is of considerable importance, as new genomic techniques are expected to increase the diversity and complexity of GM plants and traits, particularly stress tolerance, which may affect the survival of GMPs in the environment.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Environmental and agronomic monitoring of adverse effects due to cultivation of genetically modified herbicide tolerant crops
    Soukup, Josef
    Holec, Josef
    Jursik, Miroslav
    Hamouzova, Katerina
    JOURNAL FUR VERBRAUCHERSCHUTZ UND LEBENSMITTELSICHERHEIT-JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PROTECTION AND FOOD SAFETY, 2011, 6 : 125 - 130
  • [32] Personality traits, knowledge, and consumer acceptance of genetically modified plant and animal products
    Ardebili, Aida T.
    Rickertsen, Kyrre
    FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2020, 80
  • [33] AGRONOMIC PERFORMANCE AND FIELD-RESISTANCE OF GENETICALLY-MODIFIED, VIRUS-RESISTANT POTATO PLANTS
    JONGEDIJK, E
    HUISMAN, MJ
    CORNELISSEN, BJC
    SEMINARS IN VIROLOGY, 1993, 4 (06): : 407 - 416
  • [34] A methodological proposal of Environmental and Food Impact Assessment of Genetically Modified Plants (GMP)
    Cremonezi, S. M. N.
    Jesus-Hitzschky, K. R. E.
    JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2010, 150 : S572 - S572
  • [35] Guidance on the Post-Market Environmental Monitoring (PMEM) of genetically modified plants
    Andersson, Hans Christer
    Arpaia, Salvatore
    Bartsch, Detlef
    Casacuberta, Josep
    Davies, Howard
    du Jardin, Patrick
    Flachowsky, Gerhard
    Herman, Lieve
    Jones, Huw
    Kaerenlampi, Sirpa
    Kiss, Jozsef
    Kleter, Gijs
    Kuiper, Harry
    Messean, Antoine
    Nielsen, Kaare Magne
    Perry, Joe
    Poeting, Annette
    Sweet, Jeremy
    Tebbe, Christoph
    von Wright, Atte Johannes
    Wal, Jean-Michel
    EFSA JOURNAL, 2011, 9 (08)
  • [36] Environmental risks from the release of genetically modified organisms (GMOs)-the need for molecular ecology
    Williamson, M.
    MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 1992, 1 (01) : 3 - 8
  • [37] Environmental risks of chemicals and genetically modified organisms: A comparisonPart I: Classification and characterisation of risks posed by chemicals and GMOs
    Klaus Günter Steinhäuser
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2001, 8 : 120 - 126
  • [38] Lack of transparency on environmental risks of genetically modified micro-organisms in industrial biotechnology
    Tamis, W. L. M.
    van Dommelen, A.
    de Snoo, G. R.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2009, 17 (06) : 581 - 592
  • [39] US EPA oversight of pesticide traits in genetically modified plants and recent biotechnology innovation efforts
    Mendelsohn, Michael
    Pierce, Amanda A.
    Striegel, Wiebke
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2023, 14
  • [40] Impact of genetically engineered maize on agronomic, environmental and toxicological traits: a meta-analysis of 21 years of field data
    Elisa Pellegrino
    Stefano Bedini
    Marco Nuti
    Laura Ercoli
    Scientific Reports, 8