Biomechanical Properties of Novel Lateral Hole Pedicle Screws and Solid Pedicle Screws: A Comparative Study in the Beagle Dogs

被引:3
|
作者
Hu, Yong [1 ]
Chu, Zhen-tao [2 ]
Shen, Shu-feng [2 ]
Zhong, Jian-bin [1 ]
Zhu, Bing-ke [1 ]
Wu, Jia-da [2 ]
Yuan, Zhen-shan [1 ]
Dong, Wei-xin [1 ]
机构
[1] Ningbo No 6 Hosp, Dept Spine Surg, Ningbo, Peoples R China
[2] Ningbo Univ, Sch Med, Ningbo, Peoples R China
关键词
Animal model; Cyclic bending test; Pedicle screw; Pull-out test; Screw loosening; SYNTHETIC BONE; FIXATION; DIAMETER; PULLOUT; AUGMENTATION; VERTEBRAE; STABILITY; STRENGTH; RISK;
D O I
10.1111/os.13596
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
ObjectiveAlthough pedicle screws are widely used to reconstruct the stability of the spine, screw loosening is a common complication after spine surgery. The main objective of this study was to investigate whether the application of the hollow lateral hole structure had the potential to improve the stability of the pedicle screw by comparing the biomechanical properties of the novel lateral hole pedicle screws (LHPSs) with those of the solid pedicle screws (SPSs) in beagle dogs. MethodsThe cancellous bone of the distal femur, proximal femur, distal tibia, and proximal tibia were chosen as implantation sites in beagle dogs. In each of 12 dogs, four LHPSs, and four SPSs were implanted into both lower limbs. At 1, 2, and 3 months after surgery, four dogs were randomly sampled and sacrificed. The LHPS group and SPS group were subdivided into four subgroups according to the length of their duration of implantation (0, 1, 2, 3 months). The biomechanical properties of both pedicle screws were evaluated by pull-out and the cyclic bending tests. ResultsThe results of the study showed that no significant difference was found between LHPSs (276.62 +/- 50.11 N) and SPSs (282.47 +/- 42.98 N) in pull-out tests at time 0 (P > 0.05). At the same time point after implantations, LHPSs exhibited significantly higher maximal pullout strength than SPSs (month 1: 360.51 +/- 25.63 vs 325.87 +/- 28.11 N; month 2: 416.59 +/- 23.78 vs 362.12 +/- 29.27 N; month 3: 447.05 +/- 38.26 vs 376.63 +/- 32.36 N) (P < 0.05). Moreover, compared with SPSs, LHPSs withstood more loading cycles (month 2: 592 +/- 21 vs 534 +/- 48 times; month 3: 596 +/- 10 vs 543 +/- 59 times), and exhibiting less displacement before loosening at month 2 (1.70 +/- 0.17 vs 1.96 +/- 0.10 mm) and 3 (1.69 +/- 0.19 vs 1.92 +/- 0.14 mm) (P < 0.05), but no significant difference in time 0 and month 1 (P > 0.05). ConclusionsThe pedicle screw with the hollow lateral hole structure could allow bone to grow into the inner architecture, which improved biomechanical properties by extending the contact area between screw and bone tissue after implantation into the cancellous bone. It indicated that LHPS could reduce loosening of the pedicle screws in long term after surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:328 / 336
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Biomechanical Comparison of Posterior Fixation Combinations with an Allograft Spacer between the Lateral Mass and Pedicle Screws
    Lee, Soo-Bin
    Lee, Hwan-Mo
    Park, Tae-Hyun
    Lee, Sung Jae
    Kwon, Young-Woo
    Moon, Seong-Hwan
    Lee, Byung Ho
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (20): : 1 - 12
  • [32] Biomechanical comparative study of the stability of injectable pedicle screws with different lateral holes augmented with different volumes of polymethylmethacrylate in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae
    Liu, Da
    Sheng, Jun
    Luo, Yang
    Huang, Chen
    Wu, Hong-Hua
    Zhou, Jiang-Jun
    Zhang, Xiao-Jun
    Zheng, Wei
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 18 (09): : 1637 - 1644
  • [33] C1 Pedicle Screws Versus C1 Lateral Mass Screws Comparisons of Pullout Strengths and Biomechanical Stabilities
    Ma, Xiang-Yang
    Yin, Qing-Shui
    Wu, Zeng-Hui
    Xia, Hong
    Liu, Jing-Fa
    Xiang, Ming
    Zhao, Wei-Dong
    Zhong, Shi-Zhen
    SPINE, 2009, 34 (04) : 371 - 377
  • [34] Novel Dual-Threaded Pedicle Screws Provide Fixation Stability That Is Comparable to That of Traditional Screws with Relative Bone Preservation: An In Vitro Biomechanical Study
    Hsieh, Ming-Kai
    Li, Yun-Da
    Hsu, Yun-Ja
    Tsai, Tsung-Ting
    Lai, Po-Liang
    Lee, De-Mei
    Tai, Ching-Lung
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (12):
  • [35] Biomechanical Analysis of 4 Types of Pedicle Screws for Scoliotic Spine Instrumentation
    Wang, Xiaoyu
    Aubin, Carl-Eric
    Crandall, Dennis
    Parent, Stefan
    Labelle, Hubert
    SPINE, 2012, 37 (14) : E823 - E835
  • [36] In vitro biomechanical comparison of pedicle screws, sublaminar hooks, and sublaminar cables
    Hitchon, PW
    Brenton, MD
    Black, AG
    From, A
    Harrod, JS
    Barry, C
    Serhan, H
    Torner, JC
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2003, 99 (01) : 104 - 109
  • [37] Cervical spine pedicle screws - A biomechanical comparison of two insertion techniques
    Kowalski, JM
    Ludwig, SC
    Hutton, WC
    Heller, JG
    SPINE, 2000, 25 (22) : 2865 - 2867
  • [38] Revision of failed pedicle screws using hydroxyapatite cement - A biomechanical analysis
    Yerby, SA
    Toh, E
    McLain, RF
    SPINE, 1998, 23 (15) : 1657 - 1661
  • [39] Pullout strength of pedicle screws with cement augmentation in severe osteoporosis: A comparative study between cannulated screws with cement injection and solid screws with cement pre-filling
    Chen, Lih-Huei
    Tai, Ching-Lung
    Lee, De-Mei
    Lai, Po-Liang
    Lee, Yen-Chen
    Niu, Chi-Chien
    Chen, Wen-Jer
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2011, 12
  • [40] Pullout strength of pedicle screws with cement augmentation in severe osteoporosis: A comparative study between cannulated screws with cement injection and solid screws with cement pre-filling
    Lih-Huei Chen
    Ching-Lung Tai
    De-Mei Lee
    Po-Liang Lai
    Yen-Chen Lee
    Chi-Chien Niu
    Wen-Jer Chen
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 12