Biomechanical Properties of Novel Lateral Hole Pedicle Screws and Solid Pedicle Screws: A Comparative Study in the Beagle Dogs

被引:3
|
作者
Hu, Yong [1 ]
Chu, Zhen-tao [2 ]
Shen, Shu-feng [2 ]
Zhong, Jian-bin [1 ]
Zhu, Bing-ke [1 ]
Wu, Jia-da [2 ]
Yuan, Zhen-shan [1 ]
Dong, Wei-xin [1 ]
机构
[1] Ningbo No 6 Hosp, Dept Spine Surg, Ningbo, Peoples R China
[2] Ningbo Univ, Sch Med, Ningbo, Peoples R China
关键词
Animal model; Cyclic bending test; Pedicle screw; Pull-out test; Screw loosening; SYNTHETIC BONE; FIXATION; DIAMETER; PULLOUT; AUGMENTATION; VERTEBRAE; STABILITY; STRENGTH; RISK;
D O I
10.1111/os.13596
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
ObjectiveAlthough pedicle screws are widely used to reconstruct the stability of the spine, screw loosening is a common complication after spine surgery. The main objective of this study was to investigate whether the application of the hollow lateral hole structure had the potential to improve the stability of the pedicle screw by comparing the biomechanical properties of the novel lateral hole pedicle screws (LHPSs) with those of the solid pedicle screws (SPSs) in beagle dogs. MethodsThe cancellous bone of the distal femur, proximal femur, distal tibia, and proximal tibia were chosen as implantation sites in beagle dogs. In each of 12 dogs, four LHPSs, and four SPSs were implanted into both lower limbs. At 1, 2, and 3 months after surgery, four dogs were randomly sampled and sacrificed. The LHPS group and SPS group were subdivided into four subgroups according to the length of their duration of implantation (0, 1, 2, 3 months). The biomechanical properties of both pedicle screws were evaluated by pull-out and the cyclic bending tests. ResultsThe results of the study showed that no significant difference was found between LHPSs (276.62 +/- 50.11 N) and SPSs (282.47 +/- 42.98 N) in pull-out tests at time 0 (P > 0.05). At the same time point after implantations, LHPSs exhibited significantly higher maximal pullout strength than SPSs (month 1: 360.51 +/- 25.63 vs 325.87 +/- 28.11 N; month 2: 416.59 +/- 23.78 vs 362.12 +/- 29.27 N; month 3: 447.05 +/- 38.26 vs 376.63 +/- 32.36 N) (P < 0.05). Moreover, compared with SPSs, LHPSs withstood more loading cycles (month 2: 592 +/- 21 vs 534 +/- 48 times; month 3: 596 +/- 10 vs 543 +/- 59 times), and exhibiting less displacement before loosening at month 2 (1.70 +/- 0.17 vs 1.96 +/- 0.10 mm) and 3 (1.69 +/- 0.19 vs 1.92 +/- 0.14 mm) (P < 0.05), but no significant difference in time 0 and month 1 (P > 0.05). ConclusionsThe pedicle screw with the hollow lateral hole structure could allow bone to grow into the inner architecture, which improved biomechanical properties by extending the contact area between screw and bone tissue after implantation into the cancellous bone. It indicated that LHPS could reduce loosening of the pedicle screws in long term after surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:328 / 336
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Biomechanical study on thoracic spine segment fixed by pedicle screws placed with funnel technique
    Liu, Liang-Le
    Tang, Cheng-Xuan
    Yang, Guo-Jing
    Zhang, Li-Chen
    Lu, Cheng-Lin
    Zhang, Dong-Sheng
    Pan, Ke-Ping
    Yiyong Shengwu Lixue/Journal of Medical Biomechanics, 2010, 25 (02): : 89 - 93
  • [42] A comparison of the biomechanical stability of pedicle-lengthening screws and traditional pedicle screws AN IN VITRO INSTANT AND FATIGUE-RESISTANT PULL-OUT TEST
    Qian, L.
    Jiang, C.
    Sun, P.
    Xu, D.
    Wang, Y.
    Fu, M.
    Zhong, S.
    Ouyang, J.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2018, 100B (04): : 516 - 521
  • [43] Biomechanical study of lumbar pedicle screws in a corpectomy model assessing significance of screw height
    Mikles, MR
    Asghar, FA
    Frankenburg, EP
    Scott, DS
    Graziano, GP
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2004, 17 (04): : 272 - 276
  • [44] Biomechanical study of lumbar pedicle screws: Does convergence affect axial pullout strength?
    Barber, JW
    Boden, SD
    Ganey, T
    Hutton, WC
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS, 1998, 11 (03): : 215 - 220
  • [45] Increased stability due to symmetric cement volume in augmented pedicle screws? A biomechanical study
    Weber, Maximilian
    Lenz, Maximilian
    Egenolf, Philipp
    Prescher, Andreas
    Walter, Sebastian
    Heck, Vincent J.
    Eysel, Peer
    Scheyerer, Max Joseph
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART B-APPLIED BIOMATERIALS, 2023, 112 (01)
  • [46] Biomechanical comparison between C-7 lateral mass and pedicle screws in subaxial cervical constructs
    Xu, Risheng
    McGirt, Matthew J.
    Sutter, Edward G.
    Sciubba, Daniel M.
    Wolinsky, Jean-Paul
    Witham, Timothy F.
    Gokaslan, Ziya L.
    Bydon, Ali
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2010, 13 (06) : 688 - 694
  • [47] Assessment of Biomechanical Advantages in Combined Anterior-Posterior Cervical Spine Surgery by Radiological Outcomes: Pedicle Screws over Lateral Mass Screws
    Kim, Sang-Ho
    Kim, Ji-hyeon
    Kwon, Ji-Won
    Kim, Hak-Sun
    Moon, Seong-Hwan
    Suk, Kyung-Soo
    Lee, Byung-Ho
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (09)
  • [48] Biomechanical Comparison of Multilevel Stand-Alone Lumbar Lateral Interbody Fusion With Posterior Pedicle Screws: An In Vitro Study
    Mok, James M.
    Lin, Ye
    Tafur, Julio Castillo
    Diaz, Roberto Leonardo
    Amirouche, Farid
    NEUROSPINE, 2023, 20 (02) : 478 - 486
  • [49] Cervical pedicle screws - Comparative accuracy of two insertion techniques
    Ludwig, SC
    Kowalski, JM
    Edwards, CC
    Heller, JG
    SPINE, 2000, 25 (20) : 2675 - 2681
  • [50] Biomechanical Study of Novel Unilateral Fixation Combining Unilateral Pedicle and Contralateral Translaminar Screws in the Subaxial Cervical Spine
    Shi, Lei
    Shen, Kai
    Chu, Lei
    Yu, Ke-Xiao
    Yu, Qing-Shuai
    Deng, Rui
    Deng, Zhong-Liang
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 121 : E684 - E690