Biomechanical Properties of Novel Lateral Hole Pedicle Screws and Solid Pedicle Screws: A Comparative Study in the Beagle Dogs

被引:3
|
作者
Hu, Yong [1 ]
Chu, Zhen-tao [2 ]
Shen, Shu-feng [2 ]
Zhong, Jian-bin [1 ]
Zhu, Bing-ke [1 ]
Wu, Jia-da [2 ]
Yuan, Zhen-shan [1 ]
Dong, Wei-xin [1 ]
机构
[1] Ningbo No 6 Hosp, Dept Spine Surg, Ningbo, Peoples R China
[2] Ningbo Univ, Sch Med, Ningbo, Peoples R China
关键词
Animal model; Cyclic bending test; Pedicle screw; Pull-out test; Screw loosening; SYNTHETIC BONE; FIXATION; DIAMETER; PULLOUT; AUGMENTATION; VERTEBRAE; STABILITY; STRENGTH; RISK;
D O I
10.1111/os.13596
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
ObjectiveAlthough pedicle screws are widely used to reconstruct the stability of the spine, screw loosening is a common complication after spine surgery. The main objective of this study was to investigate whether the application of the hollow lateral hole structure had the potential to improve the stability of the pedicle screw by comparing the biomechanical properties of the novel lateral hole pedicle screws (LHPSs) with those of the solid pedicle screws (SPSs) in beagle dogs. MethodsThe cancellous bone of the distal femur, proximal femur, distal tibia, and proximal tibia were chosen as implantation sites in beagle dogs. In each of 12 dogs, four LHPSs, and four SPSs were implanted into both lower limbs. At 1, 2, and 3 months after surgery, four dogs were randomly sampled and sacrificed. The LHPS group and SPS group were subdivided into four subgroups according to the length of their duration of implantation (0, 1, 2, 3 months). The biomechanical properties of both pedicle screws were evaluated by pull-out and the cyclic bending tests. ResultsThe results of the study showed that no significant difference was found between LHPSs (276.62 +/- 50.11 N) and SPSs (282.47 +/- 42.98 N) in pull-out tests at time 0 (P > 0.05). At the same time point after implantations, LHPSs exhibited significantly higher maximal pullout strength than SPSs (month 1: 360.51 +/- 25.63 vs 325.87 +/- 28.11 N; month 2: 416.59 +/- 23.78 vs 362.12 +/- 29.27 N; month 3: 447.05 +/- 38.26 vs 376.63 +/- 32.36 N) (P < 0.05). Moreover, compared with SPSs, LHPSs withstood more loading cycles (month 2: 592 +/- 21 vs 534 +/- 48 times; month 3: 596 +/- 10 vs 543 +/- 59 times), and exhibiting less displacement before loosening at month 2 (1.70 +/- 0.17 vs 1.96 +/- 0.10 mm) and 3 (1.69 +/- 0.19 vs 1.92 +/- 0.14 mm) (P < 0.05), but no significant difference in time 0 and month 1 (P > 0.05). ConclusionsThe pedicle screw with the hollow lateral hole structure could allow bone to grow into the inner architecture, which improved biomechanical properties by extending the contact area between screw and bone tissue after implantation into the cancellous bone. It indicated that LHPS could reduce loosening of the pedicle screws in long term after surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:328 / 336
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Biomechanical Properties of Novel Porous Scaffold Core and Hollow Lateral Hole Pedicle Screws: A Comparative Study in Bama Pigs
    Hu, Yong
    Chen, Xijiong
    Chu, Zhentao
    Luo, Linwei
    Gan, Zhiwei
    Zhong, Jianbin
    Yuan, Zhenshan
    Zhu, Bingke
    Dong, Weixin
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2024, 16 (07) : 1718 - 1725
  • [2] Biomechanical comparison of cervical transfacet pedicle screws versus pedicle screws
    LIU GuanyiXU RongmingMA WeihuSUN ShaohuaHUANG LeiYING Jiangwei and JIANG Weiyu Department of OrthopaedicsNingbo Sixth Peoples Hospital NingboZhejiang China
    中华医学杂志(英文版), 2008, (15) : 1390 - 1393
  • [3] Biomechanical comparison of cervical transfacet pedicle screws versus pedicle screws
    Liu Guan-yi
    Xu Rong-ming
    Ma Wei-hu
    Sun Shao-hua
    Huang Lei
    Ying Jiang-wei
    Jiang Wei-yu
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 121 (15) : 1390 - 1393
  • [4] Cervical pedicle screws versus lateral mass screws - Anatomic feasibility and biomechanical comparison
    Jones, EL
    Heller, JG
    Silcox, DH
    Hutton, WC
    SPINE, 1997, 22 (09) : 977 - 982
  • [5] Micro-Computed Tomography Analysis and Histological Observation of the Screw-Bone Interface of Novel Porous Scaffold Core Pedicle Screws and Hollow Lateral Hole Pedicle Screws: A Comparative Study in Bama Pigs
    Hu, Yong
    Chen, Xijiong
    Chu, Zhentao
    Tian, Quanliang
    Luo, Linwei
    Can, Zhiwei
    Zhong, Jianbin
    Yuan, Zhenshan
    Zhu, Bingke
    Dong, Weixin
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 190 : e315 - e322
  • [6] Biomechanical Comparison of Endplate Forces Generated by Uniaxial Screws and Monoaxial Pedicle Screws
    Essig, David A.
    Miller, Christopher P.
    Xiao, Ming
    Ivancic, Paul
    Jegede, Kola
    Badrinath, Raghav
    Smith, Brian G.
    Grauer, Jonathan N.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2012, 35 (10) : E1528 - E1532
  • [7] Pedicle versus lateral mass screws Response
    Xu, Risheng
    Bydon, Ali
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2010, 13 (06) : 686 - 687
  • [8] Pedicle or lateral mass screws in Goel-Harms construct? A biomechanical analysis
    Lenz, Maximilian
    Egenolf, Philipp
    Weber, Maximilian
    Ott, Nadine
    Meyer, Carolin
    Eysel, Peer
    Scheyerer, Max J.
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2023, 54 (06): : 1479 - 1483
  • [9] Biomechanical advantage of C1 pedicle screws over C1 lateral mass screws: a cadaveric study
    Florian Fensky
    Rebecca A. Kueny
    Kay Sellenschloh
    Klaus Püschel
    Michael M. Morlock
    Johannes M. Rueger
    Wolfgang Lehmann
    Gerd Huber
    Nils Hansen-Algenstaedt
    European Spine Journal, 2014, 23 : 724 - 731
  • [10] Biomechanical advantage of C1 pedicle screws over C1 lateral mass screws: a cadaveric study
    Fensky, Florian
    Kueny, Rebecca A.
    Sellenschloh, Kay
    Pueschel, Klaus
    Morlock, Michael M.
    Rueger, Johannes M.
    Lehmann, Wolfgang
    Huber, Gerd
    Hansen-Algenstaedt, Nils
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2014, 23 (04) : 724 - 731