Biomechanical comparison of cervical transfacet pedicle screws versus pedicle screws

被引:0
|
作者
LIU GuanyiXU RongmingMA WeihuSUN ShaohuaHUANG LeiYING Jiangwei and JIANG Weiyu Department of OrthopaedicsNingbo Sixth Peoples Hospital NingboZhejiang China [315040 ]
机构
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R687.3 [骨骼手术];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Transfacet pedicle screws provide another alternative for standard pedicle screw placement for plate fixation in the lumbar spine.However,few studies looking at transfacet pedicle screw fixation in the cervical spine are available. Therefore,cervical transfacet pedicle screw fixation and standard pedicle screw fixation techniques were biomechanically compared in this study. Methods Ten fresh human cadaveric cervical spines were harvested.On one side,transfacet pedicle screws were placed at the C3-4,C5-6,and C7-T1 levels.On the other side,pedicle screws were placed at the C3,C5,and C7 levels.The screw insertion technique at each level was randomized for right or left.The starting point for the transfacet pedicle screw insertion was located at the midpoint of the inferolateral quadrant of the lateral mass and the direction of the screw was about 50°caudally in the sagittal plane and about 45°toward the midline in the axial plane.Screws were placed from the inferior articular process,across the facet complex and the pedicle into the body of the caudal vertebra.The entry point for the pedicle screw was located at the midpoint of the superolateral quadrant of the lateral mass,and the direction of the screw was about 45°toward the midline in the axial plane and toward the upper third of the vertebral body in the sagittal plane.After screw placement we performed axial pullout testing. Results All the cervical transfacet pedicle screws and the pedicle screws were inserted successfully.The mean pullout strength for the transfacet pedicle screws was 694 N,while for the pedicle screws 670 N(P=0.013).In all but six instances (10%),the pedicle screw pullout values exceeded the values for the transfacet pedicle screws;this occurred three times at the C3/C4 level,twice at the C5/C6 level and once at the C7/T1 level.The greatest pullout strength difference at a single level was observed at the C5/C6 level,with a mean difference of 38 N(t=1.557,P=0.154).The C7/T1 level had a mean difference of 26 N and the C3/C4 level had a mean difference of 14 N. Conclusions Cervical transfacet pedicle screws exhibited higher pullout strength than pedicle screws.Posterior transfacet pedicle screw fixation in the cervical spine may afford an alternative to standard screw placement for plate fixation and cervical stabilization.
引用
收藏
页码:1390 / 1393
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Biomechanical comparison of cervical transfacet pedicle screws versus pedicle screws
    Liu Guan-yi
    Xu Rong-ming
    Ma Wei-hu
    Sun Shao-hua
    Huang Lei
    Ying Jiang-wei
    Jiang Wei-yu
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 121 (15) : 1390 - 1393
  • [2] Cervical pedicle screws versus lateral mass screws - Anatomic feasibility and biomechanical comparison
    Jones, EL
    Heller, JG
    Silcox, DH
    Hutton, WC
    SPINE, 1997, 22 (09) : 977 - 982
  • [3] Cervical transfacet versus lateral mass screws: A biomechanical comparison
    Klekamp, JW
    Ugbo, JL
    Heller, JG
    Hutton, WC
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS, 2000, 13 (06): : 515 - 518
  • [4] Biomechanical Comparison of Same Size Transfacet Screws Versus Pedicle Screws across the L5-S1 Native Disc
    Chin, K. R.
    Pencle, F. J. R.
    Newcomb, A. G. U.
    Reis, M. T.
    Reyes, P. M.
    Malhotra, D.
    Yu, W. D.
    Bruce, C. A.
    Crawford, N. R.
    WEST INDIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 66 (03): : 416 - 423
  • [5] Clinical application of combined fixation in the cervical spine using posterior transfacet screws and pedicle screws
    Liu, Guanyi
    Ma, Weihu
    Xu, Rongming
    Godinsky, Ryan
    Sun, Shaohua
    Feng, Jianxiang
    Zhao, Liujun
    Hu, Yong
    Zhou, Leijie
    Liu, Jiayong
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 20 (04) : 560 - 564
  • [6] Cervical pedicle screws
    Traynelis, Vincent C.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2012, 16 (03) : 236 - 236
  • [7] Cervical spine pedicle screws - A biomechanical comparison of two insertion techniques
    Kowalski, JM
    Ludwig, SC
    Hutton, WC
    Heller, JG
    SPINE, 2000, 25 (22) : 2865 - 2867
  • [8] Biomechanical Comparison of Endplate Forces Generated by Uniaxial Screws and Monoaxial Pedicle Screws
    Essig, David A.
    Miller, Christopher P.
    Xiao, Ming
    Ivancic, Paul
    Jegede, Kola
    Badrinath, Raghav
    Smith, Brian G.
    Grauer, Jonathan N.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2012, 35 (10) : E1528 - E1532
  • [9] Hooks Versus Pedicle Screws at the Upper Instrumented Level An In Vitro Biomechanical Comparison
    Colantonio, Donald F.
    Le, Anthony H.
    Pisano, Alfred J.
    Chung, Joon M.
    Wagner, Scott C.
    Fredericks, Donald R.
    Roach, William B.
    Schlaff, Cody
    Dill, Andrew
    Mauntel, Timothy C.
    Hendershot, Brad D.
    Helgeson, Melvin D.
    SPINE, 2023, 48 (07) : E94 - E100
  • [10] Biomechanical comparison of pedicle screws versus spinous process screws in C2 vertebra A cadaveric study
    Liu, Guan-yi
    Mao, Lu
    Xu, Rong-ming
    Ma, Wei-hu
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2014, 48 (06) : 550 - 554