Perspectives of Youths on the Ethical Use of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care Research and Clinical Care

被引:15
|
作者
Thai, Kelly [1 ,2 ]
Tsiandoulas, Kate H. [1 ]
Stephenson, Elizabeth A. [3 ,4 ]
Menna-Dack, Dolly [5 ]
Shaul, Randi Zlotnik [1 ,4 ]
Anderson, James A. [1 ,6 ]
Shinewald, Alexis R. [7 ]
Ampofo, Augustina [7 ]
McCradden, Melissa D. [1 ,2 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Sick Children, Dept Bioeth, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Peter Gilgan Ctr Res Learning, Genet & Genome Biol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Hosp Sick Children, Labatt Family Heart Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Dept Paediat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabil Hosp, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Hosp Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
[8] Univ Toronto, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
PUBLIC-ATTITUDES; CONSENT; RECORD;
D O I
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.10659
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE Understanding the views and values of patients is of substantial importance to developing the ethical parameters of artificial intelligence (AI) use in medicine. Thus far, there is limited study on the views of children and youths. Their perspectives contribute meaningfully to the integration of AI in medicine. OBJECTIVE To explore the moral attitudes and views of children and youths regarding research and clinical care involving health AI at the point of care. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This qualitative study recruited participants younger than 18 years during a 1-year period (October 2021 to March 2022) at a large urban pediatric hospital. A total of 44 individuals who were receiving or had previously received care at a hospital or rehabilitation clinic contacted the research team, but 15 were found to be ineligible. Of the 29 who consented to participate, 1 was lost to follow-up, resulting in 28 participants who completed the interview. EXPOSURES Participants were interviewed using vignettes on 3 main themes: (1) health data research, (2) clinical AI trials, and (3) clinical use of AI. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Thematic description of values surrounding health data research, interventional AI research, and clinical use of AI. RESULTS The 28 participants included 6 children (ages, 10-12 years) and 22 youths (ages, 13-17 years) (16 female, 10 male, and 3 trans/nonbinary/gender diverse). Mean (SD) age was 15 (2) years. Participants were highly engaged and quite knowledgeable about AI. They expressed a positive view of research intended to help others and had strong feelings about the uses of their health data for AI. Participants expressed appreciation for the vulnerability of potential participants in interventional AI trials and reinforced the importance of respect for their preferences regardless of their decisional capacity. A strong theme for the prospective use of clinical AI was the desire to maintain bedside interaction between the patient and their physician. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this study, children and youths reported generally positive views of AI, expressing strong interest and advocacy for their involvement in AI research and inclusion of their voices for shared decision-making with AI in clinical care. These findings suggest the need for more engagement of children and youths in health care AI research and integration.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Health Care Students' Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence: Countrywide Survey in Canada
    Teng, Minnie
    Singla, Rohit
    Yau, Olivia
    Lamoureux, Daniel
    Gupta, Aurinjoy
    Hu, Zoe
    Hu, Ricky
    Aissiou, Amira
    Eaton, Shane
    Hamm, Camille
    Hu, Sophie
    Kelly, Dayton
    MacMillan, Kathleen M.
    Malik, Shamir
    Mazzoli, Vienna
    Teng, Yu-Wen
    Laricheva, Maria
    Jarus, Tal
    Field, Thalia S.
    JMIR MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2022, 8 (01):
  • [22] Transformative potential of artificial intelligence on health care and research in Africa
    Bockarie, Moses J.
    Ansumana, Rashid
    Machingaidze, Shingai Grace
    Souza, Dziedzom K. de
    Fatoma, Patrick
    Zumla, Alimuddin
    Lee, Shui-Shan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2024, 143
  • [23] A survey of pregnant patients' perspectives on the implementation of artificial intelligence in clinical care
    Armero, William
    Gray, Kathryn J.
    Fields, Kara G.
    Cole, Naida M.
    Bates, David W.
    Kovacheva, Vesela P.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2022, 30 (01) : 46 - 53
  • [24] Environmentally sustainable development and use of artificial intelligence in health care
    Richie, Cristina
    BIOETHICS, 2022, 36 (05) : 547 - 555
  • [25] Clinical evaluation is critical for the implementation of artificial intelligence in health care
    Bird, Alix
    Mcmaster, Christopher
    Liew, David
    ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2024, 76 (06) : 904 - 904
  • [26] Navigating ethical considerations in the use of artificial intelligence for patient care: A systematic review
    Badawy, Walaa
    Zinhom, Haithm
    Shaban, Mostafa
    INTERNATIONAL NURSING REVIEW, 2024,
  • [27] The Saudi Community View of the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care
    Albinsaad, Loai S.
    Alkhawajah, Amnah Ali
    Abuageelah, Bandar M.
    Alkhalaf, Rabab A.
    Alfaifi, Mona H.
    Oberi, Imtenan Ali
    Alnajjad, Ahmed I.
    Albalawi, Ibrahim A.
    Alessa, Mohammed Y.
    Khan, Arshadullah
    ANNALS OF AFRICAN MEDICINE, 2024, 23 (03) : 343 - 351
  • [28] Artificial Intelligence in Health Care - A Study on Perceptions of and Readiness for Artificial Intelligence in Health-care Professionals
    Tezpal, Manvinder
    Ghosh, Subhodeep
    Lalwani, Radhika
    Yadav, Jyoti
    Yadav, Arun Kumar
    JOURNAL OF MARINE MEDICAL SOCIETY, 2024, 26 (03) : 376 - 381
  • [29] Artificial intelligence in health care: enabling informed care
    Tarassenko, Lionel
    Watkinson, Peter
    LANCET, 2018, 391 (10127): : 1260 - 1260
  • [30] Health Care Equity in the Use of Advanced Analytics and Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Primary Care
    Cheryl R. Clark
    Consuelo Hopkins Wilkins
    Jorge A. Rodriguez
    Anita M. Preininger
    Joyce Harris
    Spencer DesAutels
    Hema Karunakaram
    Kyu Rhee
    David W. Bates
    Irene Dankwa-Mullan
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2021, 36 : 3188 - 3193