A survey of pregnant patients' perspectives on the implementation of artificial intelligence in clinical care

被引:9
|
作者
Armero, William [1 ,2 ]
Gray, Kathryn J. [3 ]
Fields, Kara G. [1 ]
Cole, Naida M. [1 ,4 ]
Bates, David W. [5 ,6 ]
Kovacheva, Vesela P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol Perioperat & Pain Med, 75 Francis St,L1, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Univ Chicago, Dept Anesthesia & Crit Care, Box 428, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[5] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Gen Internal Med & Primary Care, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[6] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Care Policy & Management, Boston, MA USA
关键词
survey; artificial intelligence; patient perspective; obstetrics; pregnancy; USER ACCEPTANCE; TECHNOLOGY; SEDATION; PROPOFOL;
D O I
10.1093/jamia/ocac200
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Objective To evaluate and understand pregnant patients' perspectives on the implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) in clinical care with a focus on opportunities to improve healthcare technologies and healthcare delivery. Materials and Methods We developed an anonymous survey and enrolled patients presenting to the labor and delivery unit at a tertiary care center September 2019-June 2020. We investigated the role and interplay of patient demographic factors, healthcare literacy, understanding of AI, comfort levels with various AI scenarios, and preferences for AI use in clinical care. Results Of the 349 parturients, 57.6% were between the ages of 25-34 years, 90.1% reported college or graduate education and 69.2% believed the benefits of AI use in clinical care outweighed the risks. Cluster analysis revealed 2 distinct groups: patients more comfortable with clinical AI use (Pro-AI) and those who preferred physician presence (AI-Cautious). Pro-AI patients had a higher degree of education, were more knowledgeable about AI use in their daily lives and saw AI use as a significant advancement in medicine. AI-Cautious patients reported a lack of human qualities and low trust in the technology as detriments to AI use. Discussion Patient trust and the preservation of the human physician-patient relationship are critical in moving forward with AI implementation in healthcare. Pregnant individuals are cautiously optimistic about AI use in their care. Conclusion Our findings provide insights into the status of AI use in perinatal care and provide a platform for driving patient-centered innovations.
引用
收藏
页码:46 / 53
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Perspectives of Patients About Artificial Intelligence in Health Care
    Khullar, Dhruv
    Casalino, Lawrence P.
    Qian, Yuting
    Lu, Yuan
    Krumholz, Harlan M.
    Aneja, Sanjay
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2022, 5 (05)
  • [2] Health Care Students' Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence: Countrywide Survey in Canada
    Teng, Minnie
    Singla, Rohit
    Yau, Olivia
    Lamoureux, Daniel
    Gupta, Aurinjoy
    Hu, Zoe
    Hu, Ricky
    Aissiou, Amira
    Eaton, Shane
    Hamm, Camille
    Hu, Sophie
    Kelly, Dayton
    MacMillan, Kathleen M.
    Malik, Shamir
    Mazzoli, Vienna
    Teng, Yu-Wen
    Laricheva, Maria
    Jarus, Tal
    Field, Thalia S.
    JMIR MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2022, 8 (01):
  • [3] Patients’ perspectives on the use of artificial intelligence in dentistry: a regional survey
    Nasim Ayad
    Falk Schwendicke
    Joachim Krois
    Stefanie van den Bosch
    Stefaan Bergé
    Lauren Bohner
    Marcel Hanisch
    Shankeeth Vinayahalingam
    Head & Face Medicine, 19
  • [4] Patients' perspectives on the use of artificial intelligence in dentistry: a regional survey
    Ayad, Nasim
    Schwendicke, Falk
    Krois, Joachim
    van den Bosch, Stefanie
    Berge, Stefaan
    Bohner, Lauren
    Hanisch, Marcel
    Vinayahalingam, Shankeeth
    HEAD & FACE MEDICINE, 2023, 19 (01)
  • [5] Clinical evaluation is critical for the implementation of artificial intelligence in health care
    Bird, Alix
    Mcmaster, Christopher
    Liew, David
    ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2024, 76 (06) : 904 - 904
  • [6] A National Survey of Oncologists' Perspectives on the Ethical Implications of Artificial Intelligence in Cancer Care
    Hantel, Andrew
    Marron, Jonathan M.
    Kehl, Kenneth
    Sharp, Richard
    Walsh, Thomas P.
    Van Allen, Eliezer
    Abel, Gregory A.
    BLOOD, 2023, 142
  • [7] Stakeholder Perspectives of Clinical Artificial Intelligence Implementation: Systematic Review of Qualitative Evidence
    Hogg, Henry David Jeffry
    Al-Zubaidy, Mohaimen
    Talks, James
    Denniston, Alastair K.
    Kelly, J.
    Malawana, Johann
    Papoutsi, Chrysanthi
    Teare, Marion Dawn
    Keane, Pearse A.
    Beyer, Fiona R.
    Maniatopoulos, Gregory
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2023, 25
  • [8] Perspectives of Youths on the Ethical Use of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care Research and Clinical Care
    Thai, Kelly
    Tsiandoulas, Kate H.
    Stephenson, Elizabeth A.
    Menna-Dack, Dolly
    Shaul, Randi Zlotnik
    Anderson, James A.
    Shinewald, Alexis R.
    Ampofo, Augustina
    McCradden, Melissa D.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2023, 6 (05) : e2310659
  • [9] Artificial intelligence, bias, and patients' perspectives
    Obermeyer, Ziad
    Topol, Eric J.
    LANCET, 2021, 397 (10289): : 2038 - 2038
  • [10] Artificial Collective Intelligence Engineering: A Survey of Concepts and Perspectives
    Casadei, Roberto
    ARTIFICIAL LIFE, 2023, 29 (04) : 433 - 467