A survey of pregnant patients' perspectives on the implementation of artificial intelligence in clinical care

被引:9
|
作者
Armero, William [1 ,2 ]
Gray, Kathryn J. [3 ]
Fields, Kara G. [1 ]
Cole, Naida M. [1 ,4 ]
Bates, David W. [5 ,6 ]
Kovacheva, Vesela P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol Perioperat & Pain Med, 75 Francis St,L1, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Univ Chicago, Dept Anesthesia & Crit Care, Box 428, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[5] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Gen Internal Med & Primary Care, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[6] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Care Policy & Management, Boston, MA USA
关键词
survey; artificial intelligence; patient perspective; obstetrics; pregnancy; USER ACCEPTANCE; TECHNOLOGY; SEDATION; PROPOFOL;
D O I
10.1093/jamia/ocac200
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Objective To evaluate and understand pregnant patients' perspectives on the implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) in clinical care with a focus on opportunities to improve healthcare technologies and healthcare delivery. Materials and Methods We developed an anonymous survey and enrolled patients presenting to the labor and delivery unit at a tertiary care center September 2019-June 2020. We investigated the role and interplay of patient demographic factors, healthcare literacy, understanding of AI, comfort levels with various AI scenarios, and preferences for AI use in clinical care. Results Of the 349 parturients, 57.6% were between the ages of 25-34 years, 90.1% reported college or graduate education and 69.2% believed the benefits of AI use in clinical care outweighed the risks. Cluster analysis revealed 2 distinct groups: patients more comfortable with clinical AI use (Pro-AI) and those who preferred physician presence (AI-Cautious). Pro-AI patients had a higher degree of education, were more knowledgeable about AI use in their daily lives and saw AI use as a significant advancement in medicine. AI-Cautious patients reported a lack of human qualities and low trust in the technology as detriments to AI use. Discussion Patient trust and the preservation of the human physician-patient relationship are critical in moving forward with AI implementation in healthcare. Pregnant individuals are cautiously optimistic about AI use in their care. Conclusion Our findings provide insights into the status of AI use in perinatal care and provide a platform for driving patient-centered innovations.
引用
收藏
页码:46 / 53
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Translating Artificial Intelligence Into Clinical Care
    Beam, Andrew L.
    Kohane, Isaac S.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 316 (22): : 2368 - 2369
  • [12] Intensive Care Unit Physicians' Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence-Based Clinical Decision Support Tools: Preimplementation Survey Study
    van der Meijden, Siri L.
    de Hond, Anne A. H.
    Thoral, Patrick J.
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    Kant, Ilse M. J.
    Cina, Giovanni
    Arbous, M. Sesmu
    JMIR HUMAN FACTORS, 2023, 10
  • [13] Considerations for Artificial Intelligence Real-World Implementation in Ophthalmology: Providers' and Patients' Perspectives
    Tseng, Rachel Marjorie Wei Wen
    Gunasekeran, Dinesh Visva
    Tan, Sarah Shwu Huey
    Rim, Tyler Hyungtaek
    Lum, Elaine
    Tan, Gavin S. W.
    Wong, Tien Yin
    Tham, Yih-Chung
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 10 (03): : 299 - 306
  • [14] Artificial intelligence: from challenges to clinical implementation
    Chassagnon, G.
    Dohan, A.
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING, 2020, 101 (12) : 763 - 764
  • [15] Optometrist's perspectives of Artificial Intelligence in eye care
    Scanzera, Angelica C.
    Shorter, Ellen
    Kinnaird, Charles
    Valikodath, Nita
    Al-Khaled, Tala
    Cole, Emily
    Kravets, Sasha
    Hallak, Joelle A.
    McMahon, Timothy
    Chan, R. V. Paul
    JOURNAL OF OPTOMETRY, 2022, 15 : S91 - S97
  • [16] Dermatologists' Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence and Augmented Intelligence - A Cross-sectional Survey
    Nelson, Caroline A.
    Pachauri, Swapna
    Balk, Rosie
    Miller, Jeffrey
    Theunis, Rushan
    Ko, Justin M.
    Kovarik, Carrie L.
    JAMA DERMATOLOGY, 2021, 157 (07) : 871 - 874
  • [17] Artificial Intelligence in Gynaecological Malignancies: Perspectives of a Clinical Oncologist
    Khattar, Himanshi
    Goel, Ruchica
    Kumar, Piyush
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (09)
  • [18] Artificial Intelligence in Anesthetic Care: A Survey of Physician Anesthesiologists
    Alamo, Carlos E. Estrada
    Diatta, Fortunay
    Monsell, Sarah E.
    Lane-Fall, Meghan B.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2024, 138 (05): : 938 - 950
  • [19] Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Practice: Implementation Considerations and Barriers
    Bahl, Manisha
    JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING, 2022, 4 (06) : 632 - 639
  • [20] Development and implementation of clinical guidelines: An artificial intelligence perspective
    Tiago Oliveira
    Paulo Novais
    José Neves
    Artificial Intelligence Review, 2014, 42 : 999 - 1027