A survey of pregnant patients' perspectives on the implementation of artificial intelligence in clinical care

被引:9
|
作者
Armero, William [1 ,2 ]
Gray, Kathryn J. [3 ]
Fields, Kara G. [1 ]
Cole, Naida M. [1 ,4 ]
Bates, David W. [5 ,6 ]
Kovacheva, Vesela P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol Perioperat & Pain Med, 75 Francis St,L1, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Univ Chicago, Dept Anesthesia & Crit Care, Box 428, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[5] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Gen Internal Med & Primary Care, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[6] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Care Policy & Management, Boston, MA USA
关键词
survey; artificial intelligence; patient perspective; obstetrics; pregnancy; USER ACCEPTANCE; TECHNOLOGY; SEDATION; PROPOFOL;
D O I
10.1093/jamia/ocac200
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Objective To evaluate and understand pregnant patients' perspectives on the implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) in clinical care with a focus on opportunities to improve healthcare technologies and healthcare delivery. Materials and Methods We developed an anonymous survey and enrolled patients presenting to the labor and delivery unit at a tertiary care center September 2019-June 2020. We investigated the role and interplay of patient demographic factors, healthcare literacy, understanding of AI, comfort levels with various AI scenarios, and preferences for AI use in clinical care. Results Of the 349 parturients, 57.6% were between the ages of 25-34 years, 90.1% reported college or graduate education and 69.2% believed the benefits of AI use in clinical care outweighed the risks. Cluster analysis revealed 2 distinct groups: patients more comfortable with clinical AI use (Pro-AI) and those who preferred physician presence (AI-Cautious). Pro-AI patients had a higher degree of education, were more knowledgeable about AI use in their daily lives and saw AI use as a significant advancement in medicine. AI-Cautious patients reported a lack of human qualities and low trust in the technology as detriments to AI use. Discussion Patient trust and the preservation of the human physician-patient relationship are critical in moving forward with AI implementation in healthcare. Pregnant individuals are cautiously optimistic about AI use in their care. Conclusion Our findings provide insights into the status of AI use in perinatal care and provide a platform for driving patient-centered innovations.
引用
收藏
页码:46 / 53
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Gastroenterology Training and Education: A Survey of Fellows' Perspectives
    Magahis, Patrick T.
    Pence, Colton J.
    Wan, David
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 118 (10): : S555 - S556
  • [32] A Survey of Perspectives and Educational Needs of Canadian Oncology Residents on Artificial Intelligence
    Favorito, Fernanda M.
    Collie, Laura
    Kennedy, Thomas
    Nabhen, Jacqueline J.
    Safavi, Amir
    Cerri, Giovanni G.
    Hopman, Wilma
    Moraes, Fabio Y.
    JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2024,
  • [33] Stakeholder Perspectives on Clinical Decision Support Tools to Inform Clinical Artificial Intelligence Implementation: Protocol for a Framework Synthesis for Qualitative Evidence
    Al-Zubaidy, Mohaimen
    Hogg, H. D. Jeffry
    Maniatopoulos, Gregory
    Talks, James
    Teare, Marion Dawn
    Keane, Pearse A.
    Beyer, Fiona R.
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2022, 11 (04):
  • [34] A multinational study on artificial intelligence adoption: Clinical implementers' perspectives
    Marco-Ruiz, Luis
    Hernandez, Miguel Angel Tejedor
    Ngo, Phuong Dinh
    Makhlysheva, Alexandra
    Svenning, Therese Olsen
    Dyb, Kari
    Chomutare, Taridzo
    Llatas, Carlos Fernandez
    Munoz-Gama, Jorge
    Tayefi, Maryam
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2024, 184
  • [35] Clinical perspectives on the adoption of the artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram
    Khurshid, Shaan
    JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 2023, 81 : 142 - 145
  • [36] Implementation of Clinical Artificial Intelligence in Radiology: Who Decides and How?
    Daye, Dania
    Wiggins, Walter F.
    Lungren, Matthew P.
    Alkasab, Tarik
    Kottler, Nina
    Allen, Bibb
    Roth, Christopher J.
    Bizzo, Bernardo C.
    Durniak, Kimberly
    Brink, James A.
    Larson, David B.
    Dreyer, Keith J.
    Langlotz, Curtis P.
    RADIOLOGY, 2022, 305 (03) : 555 - 563
  • [37] Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Health Care Applications: Viewpoint
    van Hartskamp, Michael
    Consoli, Sergio
    Verhaegh, Wim
    Petkovic, Milan
    van de Stolpe, Anja
    INTERACTIVE JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 8 (02):
  • [38] STROKE Towards artificial intelligence for clinical stroke care
    Leslie-Mazwi, Thabele M.
    Lev, Michael H.
    NATURE REVIEWS NEUROLOGY, 2020, 16 (01) : 5 - 6
  • [39] Clinical Implementation of an Artificial Intelligence Tool in the Detection and Management of Pneumothoraces in Patients With COVID-19
    Hunter, Joshua G.
    Pierce, Jonathan D.
    Gilkeson, Robert C.
    Bera, Kaustav
    Gupta, Amit
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (07)
  • [40] Contribution of CT-Scan Analysis by Artificial Intelligence to the Clinical Care of TBI Patients
    Brossard, Clement
    Lemasson, Benjamin
    Attye, Arnaud
    de Busschere, Jules-Arnaud
    Payen, Jean-Francois
    Barbier, Emmanuel L.
    Greze, Jules
    Bouzat, Pierre
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2021, 12